Don't quite get your point, if there is one here. I guess the answers would be sort of, somewhat, no and not sure.aren't you the one who earlier in this very thread accused someone of "drinking again", and recently inserted out of nowhere a political rant into a thread about proposed rules regarding the 'for sale' section (based on the same fundamental misunderstanding of censorship you display in the quote above)? pot call the kettle black much?
As I said in the suggestions/selling rules post that you mention, some things may have gone over your head, or I might understand better with capitalization. You've underscored my point perfectly with your interjection of "accused", "rant", "out of nowhere" and "fundamental misunderstanding" into what would otherwise be a rational discussion. Thanks for the examples of attempted censorship by attack.