A cheap Giulia doesn't last long. I'll be interested to see where this shows up.
Andrew
Andrew
There seems to be a prejudice towards the 2 L and a regard for the 1750.Here is the VIN. It has a 2 liter engine in it now, but we will likely put a 1750 in it. We'll see.....
Scott
What I've heard is that, all things being equal, the 1750 is "happier-feeling" and revvier than the 2L. I've had everything but a 1750, so maybe others can pick up this discussion!There seems to be a prejudice towards the 2 L and a regard for the 1750.
With a proper "build" for either, the 2 L has 250 cc of displacement providing more torque for no extra weight.
If one already has a fresh 1750 then OK, but if an engines to be built then for torque one could consider a strong 2 L.
Just my opinion, but over the past five years I've spent some time contemplating the difference.
![]()