This same topic has been gone over and over and over again on this very board. I'm too tired to argue with clowns who can't accept science anymore. Have a great unscientific debate, OK?
Alex, could you be a bit more specific? What is the science that you refer to? The scientists who make the case against CO2 are all in form or another on the payroll of the people who want to increase taxation and decrease the quaility of life for the "masses".
Is it not scientifically proven that plants are more productive at elevated CO2 levels, (far higher levels than have allegedly resulted from fossil combustion)?
Is it not scientifically proven that CO2 is soluablity in water is inversely proportional to the temperature of the water?
Do not the records of the scientists of the level of CO2 in the atmosphere, (measured at the observatory in Mauna Kea, which is where they take that measurement in case you were unaware), and the ocean temperature off the coast of Hawaii coorespond exactly?
Has it not been scientifically demonstrated that the temperature of Mars is also rising of late?
Finally, isn't it scientific fact that we are, first and foremost, carbon based lifeforms here on Earth?
Please try to comprehend what that statement, "carbon based" means.
Do you really want them to capture the basic building block of all life, turn it into an inert salt, and bury it in the ground?
Yet that is what your hard earned money will be paying for if we keep buying into this crap. Do you
, not some "scientists", do you really think that is such a good idea? The staff of life. An inert salt. Buried in the ground. Think about it.
I think it is the worst idea I have ever heard. Bar none.
Here's a picture: the level of CO2 in the last 550 million years. 5 times higher than it is now. Hmmm.