2017 Giulia TI Lemon - Page 3 - Alfa Romeo Bulletin Board & Forums
 16Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #31 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-29-2017, 07:46 PM
PSk
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga New Zealand
Posts: 11,406
Send a message via AIM to PSk Send a message via Yahoo to PSk
Lets not forget the Pinto, and even with a recent Jeep the fuel tank was still in a dangerous location made 'safe' by installing towbars.

But yes Volvo was not one of those manufacturers that (as far as I know) put profits before safety.
Pete

'71 1750 Series 2 GTV:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
156 Series 1 v6 ... and remember it's all just opinions
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PSk is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-29-2017, 08:17 PM
Del
Senior Member
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 15,232
"As for heartless car makers I refer to Volvo which invented the three point safety belt and, I believe, made it available to all manufacturers. There are other examples of safety engineering pre-dating regulation"

Cherry picking? There are recalls every week which are due to either poor engineering, poor management decisions, or poor manufacturing.

Del

Seattle

1989 Milano, Shankle Sport
1991 164S, stock
1994 164LS (~Q)
1972 Morgan 27

previously owned since 1964:

62 Morris MiniMinor 850, 67 Austin 1275 Cooper S (Downton 3/4 race), 64 Giulia Sprint GT (1st red one made), 72 Fiat 128 Sedan, 75 Alfetta Sedan, 78 Alfetta Sedan, 78 GTV, 81 GTV6, 86 GTV6
Del is offline  
post #33 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-29-2017, 09:08 PM
Registered User
 
goats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: san diego CA
Posts: 5,079
Huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PSk View Post
Hmmm ...

Michael, there is no need to open source the software. Software doesn't suddenly go wrong, sure it might be shipped with bugs but all software is and the car worked when new so no change there.

What happens is the sensors or wires fail (and why self driving cars scare me as they will always fail, or have their operation impeded, ie. bird dropping on them, etc.). So regarding DIY servicing, which the manufacturer does not care about or even want as they want a new unit to be bought, you just need to replace the faulty sensor(s) or damaged wire (this was the problem with the VW Golf's automatic as there was an internal short in a wire).

There already is hundreds of programs you can download to work with modern cars fault detection software, and you can buy the plugs/leads to connect your computer to them. My friend has one for Alfa Romeos and my 156v6 has been plugged in and old error codes erased.

Anyway manufacturers have finally made the mechanical aspects of a car so reliable that they are very close to being treated like mere appliances that the often touted 'run until it fails and just get a new one when it does' concept is very close. IMO once we have electric cars this will be reality, especially as the electric motor takes a lot of the brake wear away.
Pete
Software DOES suddenly 'go wrong'. Look up the Therac 25. Software should be open source for consumer products, but, there do need to be safeguards. In the not too distant future, software will be responsible for an ever-increasing number of deaths worldwide. I spent a good portion of my career in medical device Class 3 with tons of software. You would not believe how pervasive software bugs are based on unanticipated 'random' events that when in the hands of a million users, become reality.

74 GTV with 10548's and Ingram pump
71 Spider 1750 BOMBER ; 1995 LS 78K tight fast car
goats is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #34 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-29-2017, 10:08 PM
PSk
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga New Zealand
Posts: 11,406
Send a message via AIM to PSk Send a message via Yahoo to PSk
Quote:
Originally Posted by goats View Post
Software DOES suddenly 'go wrong'. Look up the Therac 25.
No it doesn't, the Therac 25 was produced with 'this' bug from day one. Sadly every now and then somebody got the wrong dosage as the code went down the buggy path.

BUT software updates are usually shipped now via the internet so an update could contain a bug that could cause issues, but I don't see how open sourcing the code can solve any software issues. Heck if I purchase something, I'm not remotely interested in seeing how it is coded, and I have a Computer Science degree.

Imagine also permitting anybody to alter the code for their self driving car in the near future, would be a disaster!
Pete

'71 1750 Series 2 GTV:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
156 Series 1 v6 ... and remember it's all just opinions
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by PSk; 12-29-2017 at 10:11 PM.
PSk is offline  
post #35 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-29-2017, 11:21 PM
Del
Senior Member
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 15,232
Electronics, though, can be affected by EMI/EMP. It is a real worry for the Pentagon and commercial satellite systems, the satellites being very vulnerable, to say nothing of ground based control systems for our electrical and industrial systems. Work is in progress to reduce this threat but will take years.

Ford had an EMI problem years ago with their cars, when driving near certain airports, the engine would quit. The electronics were not properly shielded from airport radar signals, etc. Friend of ours, a Boeing electronics tech, was hired by Ford to help solve the problem. Part of his payment was a new Ford, lol. Granted, the auto companies have learned much, and car mounted computers, dozens of them per car, are better shielded.

However, there are indications that cosmic rays can also alter software. While the concept of bombardment of neutrons from space sounds like something straight out of Star Trek, neutron-induced errors are a dangerous reality for many types of automotive electronic equipment. Mechanical systems just don't have this problem.

Del

Seattle

1989 Milano, Shankle Sport
1991 164S, stock
1994 164LS (~Q)
1972 Morgan 27

previously owned since 1964:

62 Morris MiniMinor 850, 67 Austin 1275 Cooper S (Downton 3/4 race), 64 Giulia Sprint GT (1st red one made), 72 Fiat 128 Sedan, 75 Alfetta Sedan, 78 Alfetta Sedan, 78 GTV, 81 GTV6, 86 GTV6

Last edited by Del; 12-30-2017 at 11:00 AM.
Del is offline  
post #36 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-30-2017, 07:12 AM
Registered User
 
goats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: san diego CA
Posts: 5,079
I agree the bug was there from Day 1, but the point is that complex software and never be tested to all permutations and therefore, hidden bugs become visible ďall of a sudden ď when the permutations get ďtestedĒ by the million users in the field. The end result is exactly the same.

74 GTV with 10548's and Ingram pump
71 Spider 1750 BOMBER ; 1995 LS 78K tight fast car
goats is offline  
post #37 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-30-2017, 07:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 2,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Del View Post
"As for heartless car makers I refer to Volvo which invented the three point safety belt and, I believe, made it available to all manufacturers. There are other examples of safety engineering pre-dating regulation"

Cherry picking? There are recalls every week which are due to either poor engineering, poor management decisions, or poor manufacturing.
Mercedes Benz invented the crumple zone now used universally.

I could keep going.

We would find very, very few American cherries which no doubt biases your views on this topic.

America vigorously legislated in this area mainly for this reason, US consumers and their suppliers were so far behind nobody outside North America wanted their cars. America is still behind in the safety aspects of the SUV and related vehicles. Again, the US industry fails to innovate without regulation. It is the consumer who drives this industry wide attitude. American cars are still avoided by consumers outside NAFTA.

1991 Alfa Romeo 164L 5 spd
White on grey leather 230K km, owned from new
Michael Smith is offline  
post #38 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-30-2017, 07:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 2,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by goats View Post
I agree the bug was there from Day 1, but the point is that complex software and never be tested to all permutations and therefore, hidden bugs become visible “all of a sudden “ when the permutations get “tested” by the million users in the field. The end result is exactly the same.
The point being made is that software only runs the way it was written without variation. Run two properly complementary programs and execution of bugs becomes impossible. That's how redundant feedback loop systems produce perfect execution of their software, perfect being defined as not dangerous.

Ironically, the human mind can invent a non existent defective execution of such software and convince twelve other humans that the non existent defect really existed. The annoying result of several alleged occurences of one of these types of incidents, in America only just btw, was redesign of brake and accelerator pedals making heel and toe virtually impossible in almost every car on the North American market.

1991 Alfa Romeo 164L 5 spd
White on grey leather 230K km, owned from new
Michael Smith is offline  
post #39 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-30-2017, 07:50 AM
Registered User
 
goats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: san diego CA
Posts: 5,079
Yes, the millionth / billionth time the executable runs, itís the same as the first time. No disagreement.

74 GTV with 10548's and Ingram pump
71 Spider 1750 BOMBER ; 1995 LS 78K tight fast car
goats is offline  
post #40 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-30-2017, 09:56 AM
PSk
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga New Zealand
Posts: 11,406
Send a message via AIM to PSk Send a message via Yahoo to PSk
The biggest issue will be hackers taking over the control of vehicles ... while initially hilarious, like the sad result of the young kids removing a stop sign deaths will result.


Michael, I'm not sure who pays your wages but you have an unusual bias towards supporting manufacturers. Yes auto manufacturers have improved safety but in quite a few cases they have to be pushed to do so. Take the manufacturer's love of SUVs, they love them because they don't have to crash test them thanks to their separate chassis. Now of course there are SUV's where the technology is not stuck in the 1940's but that is one of the reasons GM and Ford pushed them so hard originally.

I also know that there was a Ford Laser/Mazda 323 that when sold in NZ they left out internal roof bracing because NZ's laws did not demand it ... this saved them $'s but weakened the vehicle. I could go on for hours, but main point is that accountants (now) run these companies and just like every other company, profits matter. There are no exceptions, Volvo and Mercedes continued with their safety improvements to grow their marketed image, not just for safety.

In the end, when a product is sold, everything is done for the mighty $!
Pete

'71 1750 Series 2 GTV:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
156 Series 1 v6 ... and remember it's all just opinions
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by PSk; 12-30-2017 at 10:03 AM.
PSk is offline  
post #41 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-30-2017, 10:54 AM
Del
Senior Member
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 15,232
"We would find very, very few American cherries which no doubt biases your views on this topic" "Again, the US industry fails to innovate without regulation. It is the consumer who drives this industry wide attitude. American cars are still avoided by consumers outside NAFTA"

Talk about biases, lol. Yours are clearly showing now. Let's not get nasty.

In a parting attempt at evenness, let me cherry pick now. In 2016 Buick sold 4 times as many cars in china than in the US, and 46 times as many than in Canada and Mexico. So much for NAFTA. Granted, there may be per capita differences, but just counting the number of people who can actually afford the cars, the volumes speak, well, volumes.

American cars didn't sell in many countries for several reasons: one, where they were sold, they were generally too big for the infrastructure or not supported properly; two, not right hand drive; three, national purchase biases; four, high import tariffs; and five, just not sold in many countries by factory choice.

When I was working and we had foreign workers, either direct employees or job shoppers, the first thing the did was buy American cars. Asked them why, since many different foreign cars were available, and they said, well, we can actually afford them, and we can finally haul big things in them, plus they were generally more reliable than the cars they were used to, or if needed, service and parts, were always available

I think I'm done with this discussion.

Del

Seattle

1989 Milano, Shankle Sport
1991 164S, stock
1994 164LS (~Q)
1972 Morgan 27

previously owned since 1964:

62 Morris MiniMinor 850, 67 Austin 1275 Cooper S (Downton 3/4 race), 64 Giulia Sprint GT (1st red one made), 72 Fiat 128 Sedan, 75 Alfetta Sedan, 78 Alfetta Sedan, 78 GTV, 81 GTV6, 86 GTV6

Last edited by Del; 12-30-2017 at 12:37 PM.
Del is offline  
post #42 of 42 (permalink) Old 12-30-2017, 12:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 2,684
I think you'll find that all those Buicks sold in China are actually Opels. Made in China also. The Verano is an Astra with weird looking bodywork and the Lacrosse is an Insignia with very odd alterations made to the bodywork.

And NAFTA ensures North American made cars are sold in Mexico and Canada as well as the US, all nicely insulated from foreign competition by tariffs and, more importantly, significant and almost entirely arbitrary regulatory restrictions.

But we digress.

The thread topic suggests that the Giulia is of relatively poor quality. Turns out many of the complaints are based on software glitches easy to "repair" and user interface issues largely explained by the Giulia attracting customers who never before bought an Italian design.

1991 Alfa Romeo 164L 5 spd
White on grey leather 230K km, owned from new

Last edited by Michael Smith; 12-30-2017 at 12:41 PM.
Michael Smith is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Alfa Romeo Bulletin Board & Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome