
06-16-2009, 08:30 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 331
|
|
|
You all do not NEED to replace the upper bushings with lower control arm bushings. SOME of the adj upper arms I have bought have BONDED rubber bushings - which look fine to me. This is a 'new' thing I have seen in the last year or so, on about 1/2 the arms I have gotten. The bushings have 'FRAP' molded in them. Stock Alfa upper bushings are bonded and are perfectly fine to use (this is what I use). If the adj arms have the pressed together bushings, well, you know what to do... The replacement rubber bushings from the various suppliers should be fine - just as long as they are bonded.
The original lower bushing were made differently than the ones of today. The old ones had seals staked on both sides of the bushing. The arms did not have 'dustcaps'. The 'new' style lower bushings are designed to 'be around' grease, hence the caps on the end of the arms and the seals on the other side. I cannot comment on how long they will last unprotected and ungreased. Probably a long time, but I suspect the stock rubber will last longer and give less problem. Now if you drive very little and don't use it in the wet, etc, they'll last 'forever'. Since I drive on the street and generally just have fun, I will use the rubber bushings. It won't matter one bit for me, and I suspect most people here couldn't feel the difference in normal use. I am not suggesting anyone use or not use them, I am just offering extra information to think about!
Last edited by 1166; 06-16-2009 at 08:40 PM.
|

06-16-2009, 08:41 PM
|
 |
Darkside Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1166
Stock Alfa upper bushings are bonded and are perfectly fine to use. If the adj arms have the pressed together bushings, well, you know what to do... The replacement rubber bushings from the various suppliers should be fine - just as long as they are bonded.
|
The problem with the OE stock rubber bushings is that the rubber is so old..........If that's what you mean when you say "stock alfa upper bushing"?
I just receive a pair of stock rubber rear trailing arm bushings one was shinny and new the other was old and discolored with the rubber looking like it was 20 yrs old.
The supplier gave me an option to return either one but said the OE bushing was a better one. Pointing out the roughness of the inner metal sleeve and the thinner thickness of the sleeve. In general they said the OE was a better quality. I choose to switch out the OE for another shinny new one just because of the age of the rubber......................Just worried the aftermaket rubber bushings are all crap.
How do you know forsure if the rubber is bonded?
Last edited by msiert; 06-16-2009 at 08:46 PM.
|

06-16-2009, 08:45 PM
|
 |
But Mad North-Northwest
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,824
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by msiert
How do you know forsure if the rubber is bonded?
|
From my experience, you put it in your car. If it oozes out, it's not bonded. 
Did I mention this sucks? This sucks.
__________________
Tom
1991 Spider
1987 Milano Gold
|

06-16-2009, 08:51 PM
|
 |
Darkside Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gubi
From my experience, you put it in your car. If it oozes out, it's not bonded.
Did I mention this sucks? This sucks.
|
Yes you did mention it sucks and your right it does suck.
|

06-16-2009, 08:53 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 331
|
|
|
Wow, you guys are on top of things. If I can figure out where I put my arms I will take a pic of them. Don't wait for it! It will probebly take a few days... The bonded bushing says FRAP on it and the rubber is lower (by about 1-2mm) than the inner sleeve and the outer sleeve. The pressed bushings rubber is about even with the sleeves and it does not have FRAP cast into it. Of course, you will get one cast and one pressed when you buy the arms!
|

06-16-2009, 09:14 PM
|
 |
Darkside Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1166
Wow, you guys are on top of things. If I can figure out where I put my arms I will take a pic of them. Don't wait for it! It will probebly take a few days... The bonded bushing says FRAP on it and the rubber is lower (by about 1-2mm) than the inner sleeve and the outer sleeve. The pressed bushings rubber is about even with the sleeves and it does not have FRAP cast into it. Of course, you will get one cast and one pressed when you buy the arms!
|
Here's a pic of the rubber trailing arm bushings I got. They match your description of a bonded rubber to a T but it doesn't have frap cast into them???...................The pressed in bushings should have Crap cast into them so we could tell the difference better.  
Are these bonded?
Last edited by msiert; 06-16-2009 at 09:49 PM.
|

06-16-2009, 10:00 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 331
|
|
|
They look bonded. I am ONLY talking about the upper inner A arm bushing. You might want to check Alfa Stop in the UK to see if they have some 'alfastop' manufactured trailing arm bushes for Montreal for a performance bushing. Or you could install heim joints in the trailing arms... I got some OE Alfa trailing arm bushes a while ago and they looked crummy as compared to what they USED to look like.
|

06-17-2009, 06:57 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 6,645
|
|
|
The rubber-bushing upper arms that are failing are new aftermarket, not 20-year-old NOS Alfa parts. Brand new from CL or IAP; just not well designed or made.
Andrew
|

06-17-2009, 08:00 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI
Posts: 1,790
|
|
|
Allow me to jump in here and offer some comments. I have not yet experienced the issues you guys are reporting but I can well imagine that it is the wild west with most of the rubber suspension parts.
I am in the rubber molding business and I know from first hand experience what happens. The OEM bushings are the best quality because the drawings are very specific about the type of rubber and its performance characteristics. Twenty, thirty, forty years later, the aftermarket manufacturer will be handed a bushing and told to "make this". The problem is that there are literally millions of rubber formulations and it is quite unlikely that without the drawing and specifications that the correct rubber will be used. That said, a legitimate rubber molder should be able to know what would be the logical (not necessarily the optimal) rubber to use. But so many of these bushings are now made offshore in China and India. No disrespect to these guys but they don't have the experience to know what to use and their customer is not specifying it. So they use whatever they have. And of course they are sourced there for their low cost. What is generally missing from the cost equation (beyond the obvious labor rate differential) is the performance testing. Shoot and ship is the name of the game in this case.
As to the concerns over pressed in bushings verses bonded ones, done properly a pressed in bushing is many times preferable. Think of it this way: If you think of rubber as a spring (actually a spring/damper but that's a discussion for another day) you would never design a spring assembly without the spring in some state of compression. Otherwise the spring would flop around, the assembly would be sloppy and excessive wear would result.
Same thing with rubber. By press fitting (or shooting as its called) the bushing into the case, you are compressing the "spring" and eliminating the initial slop. Sometimes you mold/bond the rubber to the inner sleeve and press the assembly into the outer case. Sometimes you mold the rubber separately and press both the inner and outer metals.
The cheapest and easiest way to make a bushing is to "bond" the rubber as in the pictures above. Actually what is happening here is that a bonding adhesive is applied to the inner and outer surfaces of the tubes and the rubber is injected into the cavity. The rubber is vulcanized and bonded to the metal all in one step. The problem with this is that the rubber is in a relaxed state rather than compressed. When assembled and weight applied, the bushing will immediately go off center and ultimately wear out quicker than a properly designed "shot" bushing.
None of this helps with the problem at hand but might help to shed light on the situation. If I had the tooling (which I don't) I would and could make the correct bushings all day long. But the economics just aren't there...
__________________
- Rich D.
I like Alfas
|

06-17-2009, 08:38 PM
|
 |
Darkside Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,537
|
|
|
Sounds like replacing the inner camber arm rubber bushing with the bottom a-arm spherical bearings is the way to go for me.
Thanks for the great write up, Rich!!!
Last edited by msiert; 06-17-2009 at 08:48 PM.
|

06-18-2009, 07:16 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 6,645
|
|
|
Centerline and Jon Norman both recommend replacing the rubber inner upper bushing with the lower A-arm bushing before use, though I seem not to have gotten that message when I bought mine a few years ago.
Andrew
|

06-18-2009, 08:16 AM
|
 |
Darkside Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
Centerline and Jon Norman both recommend replacing the rubber inner upper bushing with the lower A-arm bushing before use, though I seem not to have gotten that message when I bought mine a few years ago.
Andrew
|
To go a bit off the topic.............How about the other rubber bushings???
It sounds like we should try to find alternatives to the rubber bushings when it comes time for their replacement?................And I was planning on replacing the poly trailing arm bushings with rubber ones pictured in the up coming week. Now I'm not sure???
|

06-18-2009, 11:03 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: At the other end of the state
Posts: 2,866
|
|
|
I would prefer to use the bushings in the upper part of the picture as if I am reading this thread correctly. This makes the bushing a royal pain to get out of the suspension box it is installed into. I wouldn't think that the lower bushing would be so bad to use, as I do understand that gpsprocket is saying, it is just the fact that the bushing migrates over time and wedged the upper arm into the box. Hence the cutting and other issues that have been discussed. If there are no issues with the lower A arm bushing being installed, then I would go that way and never consider having to replace that bushing again. It certainly isn't having the loads imposed on it as it would be in the lower arm.
|

06-18-2009, 11:24 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 6,645
|
|
|
Yes, that's what this post is all about. The unbonded rubber in the stock inner bushing migrates fore or aft, reducing effectiveness, and trapping the inner end of the arm in the box on the collars.
Andrew
|

06-18-2009, 02:04 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 678
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
Centerline and Jon Norman both recommend replacing the rubber inner upper bushing with the lower A-arm bushing before use, though I seem not to have gotten that message when I bought mine a few years ago.
Andrew
|
Greetings:
My two sets from Centerline in summer and fall of 2007 were not accompanied by such a suggestion. They still seem to be intact, thankfully.
- Michael
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|