
05-28-2008, 01:06 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,640
|
|
|
I believe resolution to the problem would require a complete redesign of AlfaBB (in such a way that there would be less HTTP GET requests per page).
__________________
Ruedi
'63 2600 Touring Spider (apart)
'65 2600 SZ (resto project)
|

05-28-2008, 01:12 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 4,588
|
|
|
Ruedi,
Do you have a listing of how many GETs we currently are at per page?
This is one of the reasons some forums don't allow things like avatars and images in signatures.
I really think the root of the cause is the advertisers scripts that are getting stuck trying to figure out what to serve for that region.
I'll need a few volunteers from the UK. I'll build some pages that have ZERO ads and we can see if speeds improve. Anyone willing to try?
|

05-28-2008, 01:24 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,640
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smestas
Ruedi,
Do you have a listing of how many GETs we currently are at per page?
This is one of the reasons some forums don't allow things like avatars and images in signatures.
I really think the root of the cause is the advertisers scripts that are getting stuck trying to figure out what to serve for that region.
I'll need a few volunteers from the UK. I'll build some pages that have ZERO ads and we can see if speeds improve. Anyone willing to try?
|
According to the Side-by-Side trace I posted above, there are about 29 Get requests that appeared via both links (and maybe a few more that were specific to each link -- different ads etc.). There are also about 3-4 DNS requests to ad servers that may produce different results based on client IP address or ISP.
Although in North America, I'll be happy to try test pages and capture traces for comparison.
__________________
Ruedi
'63 2600 Touring Spider (apart)
'65 2600 SZ (resto project)
|

05-28-2008, 04:17 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: (now)London
Posts: 185
|
|
happy to help
Quote:
Originally Posted by smestas
....I'll need a few volunteers from the UK. I'll build some pages that have ZERO ads and we can see if speeds improve. Anyone willing to try?
|
happy to help
__________________
1 x '03 (baby) 1.9JTD Sportwagon +GTA teledials for the win!!
1 x '66 Duetto no longer - (now with aikendrum105)
...on the hunt for a 101/750 Spider (IM me!!)
|

06-03-2008, 04:52 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 28
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfissimo Int.
Site is pretty dang fast foe me. I think it is your computer if there is a problem.
|
Well good for you!
You think wrong. There is nothing wrong with my computer and of all the sites on the internet I visit this is the slowest by a long long way.
I would be happy to help Smestas.
++
|

06-03-2008, 07:56 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,640
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfissimo Int.
Site is pretty dang fast foe me. I think it is your computer if there is a problem.
|
If you read my posts further above, you'll see that I proved that there are issues related to site design that make the AlfaBB slow over networks with high round trip time. Since round trip time increases with distance, AlfaBB performance degrades progressively the farther away a user is from the servers.
__________________
Ruedi
'63 2600 Touring Spider (apart)
'65 2600 SZ (resto project)
|

06-03-2008, 08:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dexter, Michigan USA
Posts: 2,364
|
|
|
This Site is so Slow....
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubut
If you read my posts further above, you'll see that I proved that there are issues related to site design that make the AlfaBB slow over networks with high round trip time. Since round trip time increases with distance, AlfaBB performance degrades progressively the farther away a user is from the servers.
|
If I understand what you've written and the information that your analysis provides, that means that my speed should be faster than yours based on location? Or are you and I not far enough apart to recognize the degradation like the U.K. is or Australia as a further example. I am not indicating that Australian's are having degradative issues, just trying to focus on how much distance it takes to show "marked" degradation. I'm also making the assumption that the server is located locally within Simon's vicinity.
__________________
Cheryl
(Not an authority nor SME
on anything, just PATSYF)
Last edited by Pat Braden; 06-03-2008 at 09:55 PM.
|

06-03-2008, 09:38 PM
|
 |
Registered Alfa Addict
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tempe, Arizona-US
Posts: 3,555
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlfaSZ
Well good for you!
You think wrong. There is nothing wrong with my computer and of all the sites on the internet I visit this is the slowest by a long long way.
I would be happy to help Smestas.
++
|
Thank you!~ I try!
"I think wrong"?? WTF?
BTW I was not even posting on your comment, in fact I never read it.
Man maybe less time on the computer and some time outside in the sunshine would help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubut
If you read my posts further above, you'll see that I proved that there are issues related to site design that make the AlfaBB slow over networks with high round trip time. Since round trip time increases with distance, AlfaBB performance degrades progressively the farther away a user is from the servers.
|
Great.
I simply stated that the site is fast for me and maybe it is your computer! I have an older MAC which runs slower on this site but a brand new Dell and it is lighting fast, so tell me it's the site? So I beg to differ on your findings. I would be bored to tears reading about this stuff you have proved, I am sure of it.
My post was general and had nothing to do with anyone, just giving simon some input.
Last edited by Alfissimo Int.; 06-04-2008 at 01:49 PM.
|

06-04-2008, 07:44 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubut
According to the Side-by-Side trace I posted above, there are about 29 Get requests that appeared via both links (and maybe a few more that were specific to each link -- different ads etc.). There are also about 3-4 DNS requests to ad servers that may produce different results based on client IP address or ISP.
Although in North America, I'll be happy to try test pages and capture traces for comparison.
|
Logging in from South Africa through our corporate network is unbelievably slow. When the network is busy even dial-up might be a better option. I've run a couple of traces with HTTPSniffer and altough I don't know much about network traffic, the ads seem to only be a small portion of the problem. I'm including the logs below for those of you who can better analize it. I can also include the logs from running it through my 3G account if you want. Just as a note every 304/407 request takes about 1sec (thumbs.ebaystatic.com also load after the page is displayed):
I just tested on 3G, clicking to this page from the main page takes 15second. Refreshing the page takes 60 second
Last edited by sclater; 06-04-2008 at 07:59 AM.
Reason: Added 3G traces
|

06-04-2008, 08:50 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 475
|
|
For what it's worth dept: I often connect to the bb over my school's TI supported network. Usually, I do this when the network is busiest, i.e., mornings between 8AM and 11PM (when faculty members are actually in their offices!  ), My connect time and download times, even with a busy network, are little different from my times using my home HS cable connection---a few seconds +/- either way---but fast enough that I don't notice a lag.
Forgot to mention this: Significantly, my connect/download times for European/UK sites (Alfaholics/others) seem to be as fast from this end as connecting to the bb in California.
__________________
Jim
-------------
'70, 1750GTV, 2nd series
'62, Lancia Flaminia Zagato3c, 2nd series
Last edited by 180OUT; 06-04-2008 at 04:33 PM.
|

06-10-2008, 01:04 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,640
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sclater
Logging in from South Africa through our corporate network is unbelievably slow. When the network is busy even dial-up might be a better option. I've run a couple of traces with HTTPSniffer and altough I don't know much about network traffic, the ads seem to only be a small portion of the problem. I'm including the logs below for those of you who can better analize it. I can also include the logs from running it through my 3G account if you want. Just as a note every 304/407 request takes about 1sec (thumbs.ebaystatic.com also load after the page is displayed):
I just tested on 3G, clicking to this page from the main page takes 15second. Refreshing the page takes 60 second 
|
Thank you for taking the time to create traces. I was not familiar with HTTPsniffer, so I downloaded version 1.2 and played with it. Unfortunately, the softeare does not give very detailed results (exact time stamps and what ports were used). Still, your traces contain some interesting information: Access from the corporate network shows multiple instances of "407 Proxy Access Denied." This response should not be there and indicates a problem. Every time this happens, the browser’s attempt to connect to a server failed, resulting in a retry. The first 3 rows of the "Reload - Corporate" trace are a good example. The browser tried to access the AlfaBB page "67474-site-so-slow-5.html." The first two attempts to access fail but the 3rd attempt succeeds. You’ll see this pattern repeated for several pages. Obviously, the additional requests consume time.
The function of a proxy server is explained here. One possibility is that there is a problem with the proxy server capacity or configuration, but there is also the chance that the additional time the proxy server needs to cache and process the requests and responses may lead to time-out conditions.
The 3G network shows no "407 Proxy Access Denied" responses. I’m guessing the reason this connection is slow is probably some bandwidth constraints.
__________________
Ruedi
'63 2600 Touring Spider (apart)
'65 2600 SZ (resto project)
|

06-10-2008, 02:02 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubut
Thank you for taking the time to create traces. I was not familiar with HTTPsniffer, so I downloaded version 1.2 and played with it. Unfortunately, the softeare does not give very detailed results (exact time stamps and what ports were used). Still, your traces contain some interesting information: Access from the corporate network shows multiple instances of "407 Proxy Access Denied." This response should not be there and indicates a problem. Every time this happens, the browser’s attempt to connect to a server failed, resulting in a retry. The first 3 rows of the "Reload - Corporate" trace are a good example. The browser tried to access the AlfaBB page "67474-site-so-slow-5.html." The first two attempts to access fail but the 3rd attempt succeeds. You’ll see this pattern repeated for several pages. Obviously, the additional requests consume time.
The function of a proxy server is explained here. One possibility is that there is a problem with the proxy server capacity or configuration, but there is also the chance that the additional time the proxy server needs to cache and process the requests and responses may lead to time-out conditions.
The 3G network shows no "407 Proxy Access Denied" responses. I’m guessing the reason this connection is slow is probably some bandwidth constraints.
|
On the corporate network they are throtteling our bandwith rather severly, which results in the 407 response (we need to use the corporate proxy to connect to the interweb).
One thing that I noticed when comparing this site to other BB sites (like the TDIclub site and corner carvers) is that this site finishes loading before being displayed, whilst most others finish loading the text, displays the text and then continues loading the pictures (avatars, etc). This results in much bigger perceived slowness for the AlfaBB (altough total download time still seems much slower on this site).
|

06-11-2008, 06:47 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Carlos, California
Posts: 1,043
|
|
|
One thing that occurred to me, do you primarily use the BB in an area where people are using internet apps, (such as webmail)? I've found that these suck up so much bandwidth, it makes sites such as the BB almost unusably slow.
__________________
Chris Madden
1974 GTV
|

06-12-2008, 06:35 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Keystone Heights, Flouriduh USA
Posts: 205
|
|
|
Well, I've only perused the posts on this issue and the reason is it's slower than stink! I'm on a few other forums and none are as bad, speedwise, as this one. That's my only constructive comment as otherwise I reeeeally like the site and format. However, sometimes it's sooooooooooo sloooooow I drift off to another site (AlfaGTV6.com, etc.).
__________________
Regards,
N. G. Brooks Robinson
'84 GTV6
'84 M635CSi
'89 Biturbo Spyder
| |