
06-30-2008, 06:42 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 28
|
|
|
Temp Gauge Inaccurate, too high
I finally got the motor back together and installed in my '78 Spider; it's all stock, no mods.
Before the tear down, the temp gauge ran consistently at 180F indicated. Upon tear down, I found that it had a 160F single port T-stat installed, so I replaced it with an OE style 2 port 180F (with the lower plate to block out the by-pass on warming up).
Additionally, I put the car back together with an 880CFM electric fan in front of the radiator (which was sent out to a radiator shop to be cleaned and checked), controlled by an adjustable thermal probe switch. I located the temp probe bulb directly at the upper radiator tank seam, and sealed it with aluminum tape for tight contact to the radiator for temp sensing.
The car now runs at 212F indicated, but I used a Laser Temp gauge on the manifold by the engine temp sensor and it indicates an actual temp of 180-183F, and similarly at the t-stat housing. There's no signs of overheating, and the car goes through a normal SPICA cold start/warm up cycle of fast idle and fuel enrichment.
I've double checked the wiring to the temp gauge, and all the ground circuits. Several additional grounds had been installed on the car behind the dash, and from the motor and alternator to the chassis (12 gauge wire).
So, now I'm thinking that the gauge or the sender is faulty. Does anybody have a temp/resistance chart for the sender and/or gauge so that I can measure the sender resistance or use a substitution box to verify correct reading at the gauge?
Thanks in advance for your help.
|

07-01-2008, 10:22 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 88
|
|
|
I've done several electric fan conversions on Spiders, and it always made better sense to me to place the fan sensor switch on the bottom tank of the radiator. The logic being that I'm measuring water temp after the cooling cycle has completed. I've also always used a threaded bung and immersible sensor, rather than an external, with the thought that the internal would provide more accuracy.
None of that is to say you've got any problems with your setup, other than perhaps with the gauge or sender, especially since your measurement at the t-stat housing sounds great. What does the gauge read if you ground the sender wire? What about taking the sender out of the manifold, wiring a temp ground to it, and dunking it into a pot of boiling water? Just a couple of thoughts . . .
|

07-01-2008, 10:56 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 28
|
|
|
Absent a temp/resistance chart for the temp sensor, it doesn't seem productive to dunk the sensor in boiling water (and we're at 6,000' elevation) to get a resistance reading or gauge reading. I already know that the gauge system reads 212F when the water jacket adjacent and the temp sensor body are at 180F (thanks to the laser temp probe, one of the best diagnostic tools ever invented for thermal readouts).
But I agree that an immersed temp sender for the electric cooling fan would be a more accurate way of controlling the fan. Where did you get the solderable bung and what sensor are you using?
As an alternative, what about placing a sensor in the bleeder port on the water rail?
|

07-01-2008, 12:17 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 1,634
|
|
|
Just a thought, but did you bleed all the air out of the cooling system? Perhaps the flow past the temp sensor is not correct.
__________________
[COLOR=Blue]Gifford
'67 GTV --> [COLOR="Red"]SOLD[/COLOR], '72 Super [/COLOR]
|

07-01-2008, 01:11 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 28
|
|
|
The cooling system has been completely bled with a mix of 30% anti-freeze in distilled water, and a bottle of Redline Water Wetter additive.
You can tell that the radiator is dissipating heat on all the tubes by getting the readings with the laser probe ... as well as by placing your hand in the airflow stream coming out of the radiator. The thermal image presented by the probe throughout the cooling system is consistent with proper performance throughout.
So I don't believe there's a problem with the cooling system performance, but strictly an issue with the dash temperature reading.
I'm getting a new thermal sensor today, but my supplier tells me that the "Italians consider any termp reading plus/minus 10F of the correct temp reading is accurate". If only my gauge was cosistently that close and I could document it, none of this would be a concern.
Having spent all the dough and time to go completely through this motor with all new bearings, head work, pistons/rings .... I don't want to risk losing it all due to a simple gauge problem.
|

07-01-2008, 07:57 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 88
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunsprit
Absent a temp/resistance chart for the temp sensor, it doesn't seem productive to dunk the sensor in boiling water (and we're at 6,000' elevation) to get a resistance reading or gauge reading. I already know that the gauge system reads 212F when the water jacket adjacent and the temp sensor body are at 180F (thanks to the laser temp probe, one of the best diagnostic tools ever invented for thermal readouts).
But I agree that an immersed temp sender for the electric cooling fan would be a more accurate way of controlling the fan. Where did you get the solderable bung and what sensor are you using?
As an alternative, what about placing a sensor in the bleeder port on the water rail?
|
There was a local radiator shop here, now since closed, that I purchased the threaded brass bungs from, and he charged ~$15 each to solder them in the bottom radiator tank. They were some standard pipe thread. The sensors I used are made by "Painless", and I bought them from JEGS High Performance - Your source for Edelbrock MSD Holley Mr. Gasket Moroso. It's been a while, so I may not remember exactly, but I think the "on" temp is 195F and the "off" temp is 180F, so they worked perfectly in my installations. Putting the sensor elsewhere, such as in the bleeder port, would likely require a different (higher temp?) sensor, and again, my logic is that I want to know the temp after the cooling cycle, and have that reading turn on/off the fan. On factory electric fans, I've seen sensors either before or after the radiator, so I guess it all depends on how the system as a whole is designed to respond to temp changes.
How about aiming your laser temp probe at the radiator hoses, upper and then lower, to see exactly when your fan kicks on? And with the fan on, compare temps between the two hoses. Just a few more data points to collect and check system operation. My gut feeling is still that your gauge is just reading high. I'd check some resistance readings off my '74, but right now the ignition system if off the car, as is the injection pump, and my other Spider's have Bosch injection.
|

07-01-2008, 08:33 PM
|
 |
Slacker
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern NY, USA
Posts: 6,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunsprit
You can tell that the radiator is dissipating heat on all the tubes by getting the readings with the laser probe ... as well as by placing your hand in the airflow stream coming out of the radiator.
|
Try that in a spider and let us know how it works out 
****
As to the original post regarding the high reading gauge:
It might be viable to put a resistor in the sensor wire so that it 'slowed down' or impeded the ground circut a little bit, which in turn would cause the gauge to read lower. (the better the ground, the higher the gauge goes, all the way up to directly grounding the sensor wire which will pin the gauge at max)
Of course you'd need to use your laser to make sure the gauge was reading what the actual temp was, but the resistors are available at places like radio shack in mixed resistance packs for very little money.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|