 |
|

05-13-2008, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Certified Oldschooler
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston & Spicewood, Texas; CA before that
Posts: 549
|
|
|
There was another thread on this topic initiated by me awhile back. Similar advice. I found on my 69 Spica that it pinged going up hills after two tankfuls of Mid-grade 91. I'm now back to Premium 93. I never even tried 87. I also put 4 oz per 10 gallons of fuel Marvel Mystery Oil in for the rear fuel and Spica FI pump per Wes. Bruce
PS: I'm also running 8 deg advance over this initial stock setting of 3 deg ATDC. I'm at 5 deg BTDC. No cam or other mods otherwise
__________________
Anfanuts; Ph.A., B.S.A.
Now - '69 1750 Spider Veloce ( pictures)( and more) 10562.1480323 (since '75 for that early mid-life crisis!);
- '88 Bayliner, 305 CI Cvy (for those really hot days!)
Gone - '69 1750 Berlina (wish I still had)
Last edited by Anfanuts; 05-13-2008 at 03:13 PM.
Reason: add timing info
|

05-13-2008, 03:15 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: clearwater FL
Posts: 1,207
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueSpider
Very interesting. Question I had for sometime. I am using 91 all the time on my 88 Spider and I know previous owner was running on 91 as well. From what I read it appears I am wasting money more than anything else. I shall try 87 
|
Maybe the PO didnt understand much about octane, etc. You (and too many others) are not only wasting your hard earned money on higher octane, but can also be damaging your engine with higher octane, just as one can by doing the opposite. It has been estimated Americans spend a few hundred million dollars annually on wasted octane expenditures. Higher octane can give the impression of "higher energy", or "more power", but it actually has less, measures as BTU's.
And more wasted money to the slick auto ads pandering useless elixirs/additives, preying on the avg joe weekend mechanic, and even the pros, accompanied with dubious endorsements/"research" on their concoctions of mostly mineral spirits/naphtha.
The EPA requires ALL grades of gas to contain the same cleaning additives for good engine combustion. Higher octane will not burn cleaner, only slower, reducing pinging, if required.
Lets stand together and tell these crooks where to go, and to find a job their mothers can be proud of.
Last edited by Joe Papa Sr; 05-13-2008 at 03:24 PM.
|

05-13-2008, 03:43 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 25
|
|
|
My '69 1750 definitely will start knocking if I use anything less than premium (91), especially going up hills. IIRC, the owner's manual for these pre-non-leaded gasoline era Alfas recommends the use of premium.
|

05-13-2008, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,338
|
|
|
i use nothing but super in all my cars.
__________________
1992 alfa romeo spider veloce, 15k miles
2000 saab 9-3 coupe, 18k miles
|

05-13-2008, 05:51 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 89
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anfanuts
PS: I'm also running 8 deg advance over this initial stock setting of 3 deg ATDC. I'm at 5 deg BTDC. No cam or other mods otherwise
|
Just to piggy back on your experience with timing adjustment:
At least for SPICA models, with a specified setting of 1-3 degrees after TDC (don't know what the timing is for Bosch models), is it even possible to induce knocking or pinging?
I am no expert, but I think that, all things being equal (i.e. engine in stock compression/valve timing configuration), a combustion occurring after, not before TDC should virtually guarantee NO knocking or pinging, no matter what grade of fuel is being used.
However, it seems that most Alfa owners in this forum have some kind of mods made to their engines, mainly valve timing, high compression pistons or both, which would account for different results due to 87, 91, 92 or even 93 octane gas being used.
I tried advancing my 1750 SPICA engine to 10-12 degrees BTDC, and even with 87 octane, I could not hear or induce any detectible knock or pinging. The only problems I noted were worse gas mileage, and rougher running, especially from idle to 2000 RPM.
What do you all think?
Val in FL
|

05-13-2008, 06:20 PM
|
 |
Slacker
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern NY, USA
Posts: 5,516
|
|
|
The Bosch engines have all ignition timing settings BTDC, with the only two marks on many crank pullies being TDC and 11 deg BTDC (the idle point that's checked with a light and all else controlled by the ICU) and no M at all.
|

05-13-2008, 10:47 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 78
|
|
|
I think I might need a little help, I always thought octane rating had more to do with the compression of ones' engine. I have seen some replys that mentioned altitude. I do know one thing, the older version of my airplane used 80/87 octane fuel at altitudes up to 13,000 ft and my version uses 100LL(low lead) at altitudes to over 14,000 ft, both of which are low compression, so what am I missing here? By the way the push is on from the feds to make low lead fuel a thing of the past for the low compression aircraft engines.
__________________
"With enough speed, anything will fit!!"
________________________________
1982 Spider Veloce-Cruiser Car
2003 Infiniti G35 Coupe-Go Fast Car
1990 Honda Accord-Beater Car
1977 Cessna 172 Flying Machine
|

05-14-2008, 06:42 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,681
|
|
|
As I say, I've never gotten a Spica car to ping, even in hard track driving. I use 91 and set the advance so it gets right to, but doesn't exceed, the M mark.
Andrew
|

05-14-2008, 06:53 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,196
|
|
Now, I may be talking through my hat (  and I'm sure someone will tell me so if I am  ) BUT, IMO a car specifically not designed to run on premium (like one with an under 9-1 compression) should actually run better with a Plus 89 octane or Regular 87 octane fuel. Premium ignites slower than the other to prevent detonation right  so therefore you should get faster ignition with the other grades which theorically should give you more ? power. Ok, now looking for my old Nomex racing suit. 
__________________
|

05-14-2008, 07:00 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,681
|
|
|
Re altitude, the higher you are the less octane you need. Some high-altitude parts of the US have lower octance gas; I've seen down to 85 for regular. Less oxygen in the air at altitude means less chance of pinging/knocking.
Andrew
|

05-14-2008, 01:05 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowmileage
...IMO a car specifically not designed to run on premium (like one with an under 9-1 compression) should actually run better with a Plus 89 octane or Regular 87 octane fuel..
|
I have a 92 Ford Ranger that sometimes exhibits pre-ignition under load. So for a while there I was using high octane fuel to prevent this. After a while it started suffering hesitation upon acceleration. I wasted a lot of time trouble-shooting this before I came upon a technical bulletin for the hesitation condition. It basically said to tell the client to stop using premium fuel.
I did. And the hesitation went away.
Later when perusing the owner’s manual I found a note proclaiming that slight pre-ignition is normal and harmless, and that premium fuels should not be used...
What do you know?
__________________
Steve
1972 Spider
|

05-14-2008, 01:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,196
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by santoli3
Later when perusing the owner’s manual I found a note proclaiming that slight pre-ignition is normal and harmless,
|
sounds more like the the manufacturer trying to cover up their inability to make a engine run right IMO.
__________________
|

05-14-2008, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 163
|
|
|
Time for my two cents.
Hi Steve, I hate to say it, but all Fords ping, or rattle. I don't buy Fords, however, my wife does. She says they last forever. That's becuase she has a nut that loves her and keeps her Fords up and running. Anyway, Fords have some anti-knock circuity that does not last long. As the car gets older it just knocks. The best thing to do is run some seafoam cleaner in your tank. Keep the injectors clean and that's about all you can do. You could lean the motor out some, get a chip to eliminate the ping, but that makes the engine run hotter and lowers engine life.
As for lower octane at higher altitude, less oxygen, less fire you need. My Trooper gets 15 mpg at sea level and 22 mpg in Denver. It's mostly because an engine at sea level develops more power, uses more fuel than one at altitude.
My ex-wife (Chemical Engineer) explained the main difference in octane to me as the higher octance mixes better in the cylinder and detonation occurs with a more even burn. Detonation wave is smoother the higher the octane, while lower octance detonation is more ragged. Higher compression engines work better with higher octane because the fuel needs to be more volatile to evenly mix with all that air packed in.
I guess the reason for lower octane availibilty at higher altitude is your not going to pack as much air into the cylinder and the volitility of the fuel does not have to be so high to thoughly mix with the air.
__________________
Randall
86 Spider (Slick)
|

05-14-2008, 04:37 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 78
|
|
|
I know that all makes sense to you all, but because I really don't know that much about cars at altitude(or sea level for that matter) I can only relate back to my plane which is probably operated at twice the altitude as the normal high altitude car. When I am at 14,000 lets say, I am getting the same octane that the engine was designed for(100LL) whether it's at sea level or not. Because the air is thinner the higher I go I have a mixture control that lessens the amount of fuel going into the engine, but at no time does it change the octane rating. Sorry for the hijacking by the way...
__________________
"With enough speed, anything will fit!!"
________________________________
1982 Spider Veloce-Cruiser Car
2003 Infiniti G35 Coupe-Go Fast Car
1990 Honda Accord-Beater Car
1977 Cessna 172 Flying Machine
|

05-14-2008, 05:03 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 435
|
|
|
My modified 2L with 10.4 pistons pinged a lot on 91 octane gas. In one of David Vizard's numerious engine performance books, he mentioned that Otto cycle engines all tend to have a 2400 rpm preignition phase. Accepting his premise, I decided to experiment. I installed an MSD6A multi firing ignition which fired over 34 crankshaft degrees (now 20 for new ones) until 3-4000 rpm. As I understand it, preignition, is caused by an uneven burning flame-front. The multi-firing MSD design is intended to induce more complete burning of the combustion process. The experiment worked well: the pinging was almost completely eliminated. If I worked hard I could made the engine ping a little but only on hot, humid days.
__________________
Jim
-------------
'70, 1750GTV, 2nd series
'62, Lancia Flaminia Zagato3c, 2nd series
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|