#1 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 06:46 AM
Joe Papa Sr Joe Papa Sr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: clearwater FL
Posts: 1,396
What is it with this GL-5 gear oil??

The shop manual says 87 spider gerbox requires GL-5, then you do the research, and learn the gL5 is mainly gl4 with additives, mostly made for HYPOID gears, which have nothing to do with the gearbox gears, as the hypoid gears are in the differential, right (cautiously asking, hoping for agreement).

So what is the big deal with gl5, if, when you look at what, say, IAP offers, they advertise that "later than 69 alfas need GL5", then go on to explain that Spirax 80-90HD GL5 does not have the aditives that can ruin synchromeshes.

How can you make sense of it all? If you say the spec is GL5, then turn around and say Spirax is GL5 but without additives, when GL5 is basically WITH these additives , made for the hypoid gears, which are not even in the gearbox!! That is contradictory.

It is a mess. I am considering using GL4, as it is , in my research, recommended for MOST manual transmissions, and for extending synchro life.

Whocares about an oil for the differential in this mater.........
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:12 AM
Alfacliff Alfacliff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: augusta ks.
Posts: 1,687
i drained hypoid oil out of my transmision and put in redline mtl. it is not quite as heavy as the 80-90 recomended, but really smoothed out my transmission. the previous owner put in some kind of hypoid oil and it crashed in every gear. now there is only a little crunch in second during cold weather.
I have some shell spirax I am going to try, since that is what Alfa recomends.
cliff
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:25 AM
lowmileage's Avatar
lowmileage lowmileage is offline
ReAlfisted 3/06
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back in the garage
Posts: 5,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Papa Sr View Post
The shop manual says 87 spider gerbox requires GL-5, then you do the research, and learn the gL5 is mainly gl4 with additives, mostly made for HYPOID gears, which have nothing to do with the gearbox gears, as the hypoid gears are in the differential, right (cautiously asking, hoping for agreement).

So what is the big deal with gl5, if, when you look at what, say, IAP offers, they advertise that "later than 69 alfas need GL5", then go on to explain that Spirax 80-90HD GL5 does not have the aditives that can ruin synchromeshes.

How can you make sense of it all? If you say the spec is GL5, then turn around and say Spirax is GL5 but without additives, when GL5 is basically WITH these additives , made for the hypoid gears, which are not even in the gearbox!! That is contradictory.

It is a mess. I am considering using GL4, as it is , in my research, recommended for MOST manual transmissions, and for extending synchro life.
I've also been slightly perplexed by this also. GL5 as I understand it, contains sulphur additives which aren't good for syncro's but was made especially for "rear ends." Spirax is GL5 which theorically then wouldn't be good for the gearbox unless maybe the syncro's aren't made of a metal that would be attached by the sulphur. Brass syncro's don't like sulphur so those gearboxes should use GL4. I know on Chevy forums they state emphatically that GL4 gear lubes should be used in Muncie transmissions and ditto for Nissan transaxles. GL4 isn't the easiest stuff to find nowadays. MT90 syn Redline is GL4 and my Nissan transaxle proceeded to start dripping from the axle seal shortly thereafter I started using it. I sent away for some Penzoil GL4 dino gear lube which I'm using as a fill to the Nissan transaxle and it has slowed the leak considerably. I also use the Penzoil GL4 in my Muncie 4 speed gearbox. All this being said, I've got Spirax GL5 in my Alfa trans. which everyone says is apparently OK.
__________________

1973 GTV - bought 3/06
1969 GTV, #AR1530021 - sold 10/72

Last edited by lowmileage; 02-27-2008 at 07:38 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:27 AM
lowmileage's Avatar
lowmileage lowmileage is offline
ReAlfisted 3/06
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back in the garage
Posts: 5,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfacliff View Post
i drained hypoid oil out of my transmision and put in redline mtl. it is not quite as heavy as the 80-90 recomended, but really smoothed out my transmission. the previous owner put in some kind of hypoid oil and it crashed in every gear. now there is only a little crunch in second during cold weather.
I have some shell spirax I am going to try, since that is what Alfa recomends.
cliff

Isn't the MTL a "very watery" viscosity?
__________________

1973 GTV - bought 3/06
1969 GTV, #AR1530021 - sold 10/72
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:29 AM
Alfacliff Alfacliff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: augusta ks.
Posts: 1,687
no, it is 75w something, only a little thinner than the 80w90. possibly you are thinking ot the lube similar to automatic transmission lube popular with newer cars.
cliff
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:32 AM
oldschooleuros's Avatar
oldschooleuros oldschooleuros is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 313
I am now confused. Some additives such as friction modifiers can be required to work in some geared devices, but I am not really sure if that is the reason behind this....
__________________
[COLOR="Green"]When cornering hard.... It's not the tires screaming...[/COLOR] [COLOR="Red"]It's the road begging for mercy. [/COLOR]
[COLOR="Red"]1985 Maserati[/COLOR][COLOR="Green"] Biturbo, 5spd. A work in progress. [/COLOR]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:36 AM
lowmileage's Avatar
lowmileage lowmileage is offline
ReAlfisted 3/06
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back in the garage
Posts: 5,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfacliff View Post
no, it is 75w something, only a little thinner than the 80w90. possibly you are thinking ot the lube similar to automatic transmission lube popular with newer cars.
cliff
That was it, thanks
__________________

1973 GTV - bought 3/06
1969 GTV, #AR1530021 - sold 10/72
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:43 AM
Zunige's Avatar
Zunige Zunige is offline
In the Spiders' nest...
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nutley/NJ & Middletown/OH, USA
Posts: 4,878
The confusion stems from the preference to use Redline synthetic oils. For the differential Redline 75W/90 is great. It contains EP (Extreme Pressure) modifiers. The EP modifiers however, make the oil too slippery to use in the gearbox, as the synchros won't like this. Thus, for the transmission one must use synthetic Redline 75W/90 NS. The "NS" (Non-Slip) being the critical designation, meaning that it does not contain the EP modifiers that make the oil too slippery.

I would encourage a search, as there are a number of posts on this subject.

Best regards,
__________________
Enrique
Spider 74, 84 & 87
164 93L & 95Q
Milano 88 Verde
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:51 AM
lowmileage's Avatar
lowmileage lowmileage is offline
ReAlfisted 3/06
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back in the garage
Posts: 5,840
Unfortunately, this doesn't answer the question of using Spirax GL5 in the gearbox.
__________________

1973 GTV - bought 3/06
1969 GTV, #AR1530021 - sold 10/72
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:05 AM
Joe Papa Sr Joe Papa Sr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: clearwater FL
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zunige View Post
The confusion stems from the preference to use Redline synthetic oils. For the differential Redline 75W/90 is great. It contains EP (Extreme Pressure) modifiers. The EP modifiers however, make the oil too slippery to use in the gearbox, as the synchros won't like this. Thus, for the transmission one must use synthetic Redline 75W/90 NS. The "NS" (Non-Slip) being the critical designation, meaning that it does not contain the EP modifiers that make the oil too slippery.

I would encourage a search, as there are a number of posts on this subject.

Best regards,
Thanks, Zunige, but I believe this redline ns stuff is shrouded in suspicious "dark science". It cant be the only gera oil without modifiers, as GL4 is just that, I believe. I talked with the tech rep from Exxon 2 days ago, and he believes all the little guys tout their brew to get an "edge", in different words, of course.

If you dont need the modifiers, maybe we should stay away from GL5, then........use GL4. Most sources say GL4 is for MOST manual trans's.

Note: the additives of Sulfur do not harm our alfas as far as corrosion, since there are no "yellow" metals in there(although they may maqke the stuff sliperier.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:07 AM
Joe Papa Sr Joe Papa Sr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: clearwater FL
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowmileage View Post
Unfortunately, this doesn't answer the question of using Spirax GL5 in the gearbox.
Right. So why do they claim their GL5 does not have the modifiers, if GL5 is supposed to contain them(scratching scalp like a primate, confused).......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:09 AM
Alfacliff Alfacliff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: augusta ks.
Posts: 1,687
redline mtl is "Manual transmission lube" it works for me. a lot better than whatever the prevoius owner put in.
cliff
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:12 AM
lowmileage's Avatar
lowmileage lowmileage is offline
ReAlfisted 3/06
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back in the garage
Posts: 5,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Papa Sr View Post
Right. So why do they claim their GL5 does not have the modifiers, if GL5 is supposed to contain them(scratching scalp like a primate, confused).......
........................

Then again, on a more technical note:
Automotive lubricant engineering - Differences between EP90 GL4 and GL5
Attached Images
 
__________________

1973 GTV - bought 3/06
1969 GTV, #AR1530021 - sold 10/72

Last edited by lowmileage; 02-27-2008 at 08:16 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:16 AM
Anfanuts's Avatar
Anfanuts Anfanuts is offline
Certified Oldschooler
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston & Spicewood, Texas; CA before that
Posts: 919
Need it Organized in a Table

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zunige View Post
The confusion stems from the preference to use Redline synthetic oils. For the differential Redline 75W/90 is great. It contains EP (Extreme Pressure) modifiers. The EP modifiers however, make the oil too slippery to use in the gearbox, as the synchros won't like this. Thus, for the transmission one must use synthetic Redline 75W/90 NS. The "NS" (Non-Slip) being the critical designation, meaning that it does not contain the EP modifiers that make the oil too slippery.

I would encourage a search, as there are a number of posts on this subject.

Best regards,
Enrique, the last time this topic appeared in a thread, the info was confusing as well : model year, LSD vs. non-LSD, aged vs new tranny, opinions.

What would be very nice is the experts putting together a table in a sticky (like the recent wheel weight table) on this to organize and vet the information in one place. Define what lubes (and additives) are recommended or optional by model year/series and any other pertinent parameters. Thread banter is fine bor background and explanations. Still .

What expert will step up on this? Thanks in advance. Bruce
__________________
Anfanuts; Ph.A., B.S.A.
Now
- '69 1750 Spider Veloce (pictures)(and more) 10562.1480323 (since '75 for that early mid-life crisis!);
- '88 Bayliner, 305 CI Cvy (for those really hot days!)
Gone - '69 1750 Berlina (wish I still had)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:25 AM
Elio Comello Elio Comello is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Camlachie Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,122
I believe the GL1/GL4 designation is for the NON Moly synchro's in the earlier gearboxes.

Alfa Factory spec PA38150000