
11-23-2007, 09:38 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 3,464
|
|
|
Great pictures! We like pictures!
Please tell me more about the wrench you are using on the intake cam's nut (55mm wrench). I've been fortunate thus far in that I haven't need to adjust the intake cam. But should I ever need/want to do so I need such a wrench. I tried to make one from a wrench I bought in the plumbing section of Home Depot but that wrench wasn't sturdy enough to loosen the VVT's nut.
TIA,
|

11-23-2007, 09:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 3,464
|
|
|
Thinking about the AFM's spring tension - making it 'softer' meaning less spring tension - wouldn't that allow the 'flapper door' to swing open further & faster? And wouldn't that tell the ECU to send more fuel? I thought your efforts were in search of more MPG's. Or am I not understanding?
|

11-24-2007, 01:08 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: california
Posts: 53
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghnl
Great pictures! We like pictures!
Please tell me more about the wrench you are using on the intake cam's nut (55mm wrench). I've been fortunate thus far in that I haven't need to adjust the intake cam. But should I ever need/want to do so I need such a wrench. I tried to make one from a wrench I bought in the plumbing section of Home Depot but that wrench wasn't sturdy enough to loosen the VVT's nut.
TIA,
|
I got it from McMaster-Carr. McMaster-Carr
i think its P/N:5746A15 29.90 plus shipping
|

11-24-2007, 01:11 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: california
Posts: 53
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghnl
Thinking about the AFM's spring tension - making it 'softer' meaning less spring tension - wouldn't that allow the 'flapper door' to swing open further & faster? And wouldn't that tell the ECU to send more fuel? I thought your efforts were in search of more MPG's. Or am I not understanding?
|
yea i know, i gave up on trying to baby the car for gas mileage since i got 27 with slight city driving and then 29 just driving how i wanted. it was strange. so i decided to just have my fun and make some power and see what i get with some of these mods. i'll post some more pictures tomorrow of some other stuff i've done, like the oil system and the intake system and whatever else seems interesting.
|

11-24-2007, 06:41 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: clearwater FL
Posts: 1,392
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tifosi
You can pick up 11 degrees on the intake cam by simply disconnecting the VVT solinoid. (provided yours is electronic and not the mechanical centerfuge version)
Well, 'pick up' is the wrong phrase. More like prevent an 11 degree advance, or, leave the cam 11 degrees retarded. However you want to look at it. :shrug:
That way it'll never kick into power mode and stay in the much 'softer' econo/closed loop (and better emissions) mode most all the time. There will still be a bit of open loop enrichment when you honk down on the throttle, but the intake cam won't kick over to the suck fuel degree index.
I suppose one could even disconnect the full throttle contact at the TPS also so that it didn't even get into an enrichment/open loop mode, but I'd imagine that would turn the car into a downright pig.
Well, actually, no 'imagine' about it, it would turn it into a pig. But hey, if it's mileage you're after, then sacrifices must be made, right?
Still, in a proper state of tune, you should be seeing milage in the upper 20's if not 30mpg range.
If you're not getting around that now, tinkering the cams is going to be far less benificial than an actual factual tune-up.
|
So, back to the VVT...disconnecting it WILL improve mileage without doing harm to the engine? I am really interested in this....how much miles per gallon??
(87 spider)
Thanks!
|

11-24-2007, 08:01 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 3,464
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDB
yea i know, i gave up on trying to baby the car for gas mileage since i got 27 with slight city driving and then 29 just driving how i wanted. it was strange. so i decided to just have my fun and make some power and see what i get with some of these mods.
|
The difference between the mpg's in the two tanks of fuel is interesting but not totally conclusive. Too many other variables - temperatures, how full was 'full', fuel supply - some folks report different mpg's with 'winter' fuel vs 'summer' fuel (and most gas stations are switching over about now here in North America), ethanol blends (less mpg with ethanol I believe), etc...
Quote:
|
i'll post some more pictures tomorrow of some other stuff i've done, like the oil system and the intake system and whatever else seems interesting.
|
It's all interesting. More pictures - yay!
|

11-24-2007, 08:01 AM
|
 |
In the Spiders' nest...
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nutley/NJ & Middletown/OH, USA
Posts: 4,861
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Papa Sr
So, back to the VVT...disconnecting it WILL improve mileage without doing harm to the engine? I am really interested in this....how much miles per gallon??
(87 spider)
Thanks!
|
Not supplying fuel does mean that you will save fuel, but I can't see how any of this would yield decent power. You're not going to hurt the engine, but it is going to feel like something is wrong. I wouldn't do it. (I also believe Tifosi is providing technical info that is geared more towards understanding the Alfa set-up and how fuel is delivered, rather than as an actual suggestion that this is what anyone should be doing with his/her car.) The '87 should be yielding acceptable gas mileage - mid 20's and much better on the highway. Also, driving the car smoothly does make a big difference in the mpg, even on the highway.
Best regards,
__________________
Enrique
Spider 74, 84 & 87
164 93L & 95Q
Milano 88 Verde
|

11-24-2007, 08:03 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 3,464
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Papa Sr
So, back to the VVT...disconnecting it WILL improve mileage without doing harm to the engine? I am really interested in this....how much miles per gallon??
|
I vote that you run a few tests (disconnectiing the VVT solenoid won't damage the engine). Drive a couple of tankfulls with it 'on' then a couple of tankfulls with it 'off' and record your fuel mileage for each. Report back soon!
|

11-24-2007, 08:26 AM
|
 |
In the Spiders' nest...
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nutley/NJ & Middletown/OH, USA
Posts: 4,861
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghnl
... Drive a couple of tankfulls with it 'on' then a couple of tankfulls with it 'off' and record your fuel mileage for each. Report back soon!
|
I like this "advice", Eric! Just drive two tanks with, two without, all soon to realize how to "save" gas (and money)...   
Best regards,
__________________
Enrique
Spider 74, 84 & 87
164 93L & 95Q
Milano 88 Verde
|

11-24-2007, 08:31 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 3,464
|
|
|
All in the interest of science, of course...
|

11-24-2007, 08:59 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: california
Posts: 53
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't have the electric VVT. It's the hydraulic one. Any way to see if this works or not. Maybe supply some air pressure to the holes and watch it move or something. Also while the cams out, I could count all those splines and find out how many degrees I advanced it. Get some "specs" on it.
|

11-24-2007, 03:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 3,464
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDB
...supply some air pressure to the holes and watch it move or something...
|
That is exactly how you 'test' it. With the camshaft out of the car apply 40 - 60 psi air pressure to the oil supply hole of the front cam bearing (#9 in sketch). Then move the spring loaded weight (#15) in the front of the VVT and it moves (quickly!). Release the weight and it returns to the start position.
|

11-24-2007, 03:38 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: clearwater FL
Posts: 1,392
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zunige
Not supplying fuel does mean that you will save fuel, but I can't see how any of this would yield decent power. You're not going to hurt the engine, but it is going to feel like something is wrong. I wouldn't do it. (I also believe Tifosi is providing technical info that is geared more towards understanding the Alfa set-up and how fuel is delivered, rather than as an actual suggestion that this is what anyone should be doing with his/her car.) The '87 should be yielding acceptable gas mileage - mid 20's and much better on the highway. Also, driving the car smoothly does make a big difference in the mpg, even on the highway.
Best regards,
|
Yeah, I guess Ill leave it alone for now.....
|

11-24-2007, 04:23 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: california
Posts: 53
|
|
 | |