#16 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 05:08 PM
ALEXV6's Avatar
ALEXV6 ALEXV6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italia, Roma
Posts: 7
Yes, it's a 2.0 V6 with turbo 210bhp costants + overboost. The turbo is a Garret T25 with a costant pressure of 0.85 bar and peak of 1.1 in overboost. The overboost works for about 25 seconds temporary increaseing the torque and the power approximately 25-30 hp
The 3.0 V6 24v 218 hp is heavy like this,I thik is a little more heavy the 2.0 v6 because there is the weight of the turbine, intercooler etc. , but the turbo have a better torque, over 2400rpm when starts the overpressure, is more powerfull olso for the overboost and for the tipical distribution of the turbo engines. But of course de 3.0 is more elastic at low regimes
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 06:50 PM
jmb jmb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 119
very nice........the rims look cool.

thanks for the pics!!! do not see cars like thast around here
__________________
89 Spider Graduate
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 07:12 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,578
Send a message via AIM to Grant
Quote:
Originally Posted by MottoGuzzi View Post
Is that a 2 litre engine with turbo?? I've read that the 3 litre V6 is a little heavy handling, this this must really handle with the smaller engine but the with the turbo power. WOW!! I'm envious.
It's obviously a V6 still...why would you think it being a two liter would make much difference?
And he's right, turbo versions of NA engine usually end up being heavier.
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. [B][COLOR="Red"][URL="http://alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?t=42980"]PARTING OUT[/URL][/COLOR][/B]

1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!

1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 07:39 PM
MottoGuzzi MottoGuzzi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 177
My GTV TB V6 from Italy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant View Post
It's obviously a V6 still...why would you think it being a two liter would make much difference?
And he's right, turbo versions of NA engine usually end up being heavier.
Wouldn't a 2 liter V6 be lighter in weight then a 3 liter V6?? I did not consider the weight of the turbo and intercooler. Wouldn't a 2 liter V6 turbo also consume less gas then normally aspirated 3 liter? Depending upon how much boost the turbo is running? I always thought the idea behind turbocharging a smaller engine is to bring the power levels up to that of a larger engine without the negatives of more weight and more gas consumation of the larger engine?? Right or wrong??
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2007, 08:08 PM
nizam's Avatar
nizam nizam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,963
Nice car, Alex!

From the picture you took, it doesn't look like a 24v engine, although there is no doubt it's a Turbo 2.0V6 ... looks like a 12-valve V6 engine, with the distributor driven off the RH camshaft.

Motoguzzi - the engine blocks are dimensionally similar between the 2.0V6, 2.5V6 and 3.0V6 ... I don't think it'll be any lighter in the 2.0V6! Perhaps you're thinking of the 2.0TS (4-cylinder, 16-valve) engine?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 08:31 AM
Nipper's Avatar
Nipper Nipper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 422
I believe this fiat 500 has one of those V6 turbo engines.
Attached Images
  
__________________
Adam D
89 Alfa 75 3.0 V6 & 84 Alfa GTV
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 01:53 PM
ALEXV6's Avatar
ALEXV6 ALEXV6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italia, Roma
Posts: 7
Nizam. Ahhh You refer at the chrome label "24v" I put this to cover a scratc right is a 12v. There was some prototypes of GTv 24v turbo but after, FIAT decided stop the evolution fot her strange marketing ideas. Infact the Alfa's turbo's production was stoped in 2001.

X Motoguzzi. Correct The v6 turbo engine consume less gas then aspirated 3 liter in normal conditions, while turbo running consume more then 3.0., obviously because enters more gas and air compressed

X Nipper yes it's a V6 turbo, I think of a 164 V6 TB Super 93-97

For all. I'm soryy for my bad english
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



AlfaBB Blog Articles

Advertisement


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright 2002-2008 AlfaBB.com All Rights Reserved.


An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com