|
Crane cams spec sheet
From the spec sheet you can Identify that they are :
1) Regrinds. To get to intake lift of .450 from .358 is going to require a minimum base circle reduction of at least 1.5mm (.060) or placing it in the 1.020 range (down from 1.080) This will require .030 thicher shims on average than existing ones. As well there is not adequate clearance for this valve lift. (need shorter retainers and cut down guides deeper in head for seal clearance, or no seal)
As to exhaust the same reduction would have to be removed from the base circle. With lift larger than the intake (.497??) there is inadequate clearance in stock heads for that amount of valve lift. (cut down guides & retainers with no seal)
Worse, the rockers are going to have a difficult time living with these lift amounts, made worse by small base circles.
2) Overlap of 106 degrees?? This is so far above what would work at anything other than 6000 RPM up that it is absurd. Check other builders overlap data for full race cams. They will never work with FI other than a custom programable race system. Then you have the rocker problem with high lift cams as they will not live at high rpm with out special ramp design and moderate lift. And adequate for the exhaust is around .425 on a full race motor.
Old (period in time) Shankle Race cams for the V6 had 52 degrees overlap lifts of .450 &and duration at .050 of 275 degrees, exhausr lift of .425 with 250 degrees duration using faster intake ramps & more moderate exhaust ramps that were breakers as well. Rating of "13" on someone`s "comparative" scale.
Post a pic and maybe more can be told of the upper lift design.
__________________
Richard Jemison
RJR Racing
http://scuderiagiallo.com
"you don`t have to listen, but you won`t win the argument"!
"Nothing that I might suggest will be legal in California"
Last edited by Alfar7; 03-31-2008 at 08:51 PM.
|