
10-14-2007, 12:37 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisvegas, Australia
Posts: 520
|
|
Low enough to wipe up your oil sump on the smallest speed hump
Just keep in mind the ideal geometry for these cars is to have the rear slightly higher than the front. It may look a little weird, but evening it or reversing it will alter the handling characteristics quite dramatically. You'll also lose high speed stability as the front will start to lift too far. Trust me, I know
ROCK ON
R~R
|

10-14-2007, 08:39 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sherborn, MA
Posts: 57
|
|
|
27mm torsion bars and super sport springs
fwiw, 27mm torsion bars are stiffer than grant indicates and the rear springs are softer.
imho, wheel rate is the only way to measure this stuff. that is a measure of the force required to raise the wheel an inch. on a specific chassis, wheel rate is wheel rate - takes spring location/angle out of the equation and gives the net result.
short bars (milano & late GTV6) have a wheel rate of ~ 294#/inch. long bars (alfetta & GTV6 to mid '85) are ~ 274#/inch.
the SS rear springs are ~ 140#/inch.
imho, there is absolutely no tangible benefit to spending the huge $ required for an RSR suspension.
if money is a consideration for you - buy JJs used 27s, throw them in and enjoy your car.
in my experiences, you do need a stiffer shock to adequately control the heavier springs - but if need be, you can get by w/ stock units until you can afford more.
as to F/R ride height - best way to set is to corner weight the car. if that is not easily accessible for you, good rule of thumb is to set rear 1/2" - 1" higher than front (measuring to the bottom of the jack points, if you still have them, is very convenient). will be close enough to give satisfactory results. w/ a limited budget - easiest way is to work off the rear springs final ride height. measure rears, then set front ride height to the desired spec.
don't forget to realign front when you are done - since this sounds like a mostly street car, probably smartest bet is to set camber to negative end of the alfa spec for your car. will give good results. of course, can go more negative - more negative you go, better handling and cornering, but soon you cross into severe tire eating mode - which for most guys, just plain does not make sense on a street car.
|

10-14-2007, 11:48 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,486
|
|
|
Barbone, I got my numbers right from the Shankle Catalog. Where are you getting yours?
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. PARTING OUT
1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!
1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
|

10-14-2007, 01:12 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sherborn, MA
Posts: 57
|
|
|
spring specs
hi grant, i got mine from the torsion bar makers.
gave him control arm dimensions and had him compute wheel rate for long and short bars in diameters of 27, 30, 33, 36.
asked coil spring maker what the rates are. if i get a chance will measure rears to confirm, but assume he knows what he is talking about.
andy
|

10-14-2007, 01:44 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Jose
Posts: 430
|
|
|
__________________
Louis
1987 75 RS 24V
1987 Milano Verde ex RS Racing Special (1st RS kit in USA!!!)
2004 BMW M3
2002 Porsche Boxster
Last edited by Potenziato; 10-14-2007 at 01:47 PM.
|

10-14-2007, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,486
|
|
What did he say the wheel rates were for 30mm and 33mm?
And if you want your car to look like Louis' Avatar picture when you hit a pothole, get RS Racing
I'm joking though, RS racing is better.
However, this conversation is off-topic, we should really be letting Cmilano know why running 350lb inch rear springs and 150lb inch front torsion bars is a bad idea.
Also, Cmilano, you DO NOT want to lower your milano with stock torsion bars. GTV6 have bump stops that keep the sump from hitting the ground, Milanos do not! You must get higher spring rates in the front of your car or you will regret it. I don't think you should lower the front any more than a 1/4-1/2 of an inch. I was bottoming a lot on just dips in the freeway. And that was when my car was stock.
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. PARTING OUT
1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!
1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Last edited by Grant; 10-14-2007 at 02:40 PM.
|

10-15-2007, 08:24 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sherborn, MA
Posts: 57
|
|
|
short bars - 30 = 448; 33 = 663
long bars - 30 = 418; 33 = 618
imho, agree, is not a good thing to lower front and not increase spring rate, especially with stiffer springs in rear. upsets balance of chassis, and reduces travel in front to keep car off the stops.
i do know guys who have done it, but i wouldn't.
andy
|

10-15-2007, 09:03 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,961
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmilano
im only 17 and dont have much money to spend on the car.
thats y i was interested to see if just cutting the springs and adjusting the front torsion bars would be acceptable.i want to get rid of the gap in the wheel well so i think ill probably go with the rs racing springs in the rear and then just adjust the front torsion bars.how much do the torsion bars allow u to lower the front end?
|
Before throwing money at it I would simply try cutting a coil and see how you like it. If you are not happy, then take up Colin on the offer or buy RSR rear springs. I ran cut stock rear springs on a Milano Verde for years, and I even tracked it a little like that. The front was lowered to match.
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
Last edited by AR4me; 10-15-2007 at 09:21 AM.
|

10-15-2007, 12:14 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milpitas CA
Posts: 1,483
|
|
|
mine has bump stops the are big rubber things that go on the shocks.
when I got the car is had reds with out the rubber stops. I would bottom out all the time and the left tire had worn a hole in the cover and would pop the hood evey time I hit a bump. the reds were shot as they were going in too far and had damaged the valves. I got a set of stock shocks with the bump stops at APE and it was day and night. If you get new shocks take the bump stops off the old stock shocks. they are needed in a big way.
__________________
1987 black Milano Verde
1972 White spider 2000 Veloce
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|