
06-17-2007, 12:58 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,094
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikoror
I think that for a race car the coil-over+torsion bar configuration is very... "inefficient".
|
Are you serious?
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
|

06-17-2007, 01:11 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 78
|
|
|
i mean inefficient in terms of optimum design. not that it's not doing its job right. maybe "not optimal" is a better way to describe it. the problem is too much weight...
__________________
[URL="www.racingowls.com"]Rice University SAE[/URL]
|

06-17-2007, 02:02 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,094
|
|
|
Are you saying a coil-over adds more weight than a 33 mm torsion bar?
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
|

06-17-2007, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 97
|
|
|
The Utah afternoon video is now up on page 2.
Does anybody have the weights of the various diameter torsion bars?
-damen
__________________
Rice Society of Automotive Engineers
[url]www.RacingOwls.com[/url]
|

06-17-2007, 04:12 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 97
|
|
|
Day 5: Pueblo Motorsports Park, Pueblo, CO (morning)
The drive from Utah to Pueblo, CO took us along US highway 50 through the rockies up to 12,000 feet at around 3am. It was 26deg F up there with 4 ft of snow along the sides of the freeway. Driving through there the driver was able to bundle everything up except for the feet, and the open hole at the base of the windshield (under the rain tray, leading into the passenger compartment) was blowing 60mph air right on the drivers feet. Without any form of heating or insulation, we had to stop and switch drivers each time the current drivers feet went numb. Also, the Yokohama summer tires were less than ideal for the conditions. It was a miserable transition (even though it was only 600 miles) that put us into our hotel in Pueblo around 6am
Up again at 8am, we arrived at the track to find that it was a much better configuration for the Alfa (although the 2500' front straight was longer than we would have liked) and we were able to place much better: 43/75.
This was the first time I had seen this track, but it was a really fun configuration. I apologize for the camera spazzing, it's something I'll have to look into for next year (especially since we are considering doubling the stiffness of the suspension).
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3efKGJ6Ih0k"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3efKGJ6Ih0k" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
-damen
__________________
Rice Society of Automotive Engineers
[url]www.RacingOwls.com[/url]
Last edited by RSAE; 06-17-2007 at 04:18 PM.
|

06-17-2007, 09:16 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 78
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AR4me
Are you saying a coil-over adds more weight than a 33 mm torsion bar?
Jes
|
i know we are getting a bit off-topic here...
I am saying that a setup designed for a torsion bar is not optimal for a coil-over why keep the torsion bar as a part of a progressive spring on a race car? why keep the heavy lower a-arm designed to work with a torsion bar?
about torsion bar weights: you know the diameter, you know the length, check material density online and that's it the location of the torsion bar is a pretty good spot for any extra weight though... (if there is such a thing as good extra weight )
__________________
[URL="www.racingowls.com"]Rice University SAE[/URL]
|

06-17-2007, 09:27 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,094
|
|
|
Too bad you don't have the opportunity to compare. Anyway, each to his own...
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
|

06-17-2007, 09:33 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 78
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AR4me
Too bad you don't have the opportunity to compare. Anyway, each to his own...
Jes
|
we don't really have the budget to compare
__________________
[URL="www.racingowls.com"]Rice University SAE[/URL]
|

06-17-2007, 10:20 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,573
|
|
|
Jes,
Have you been able to drive a car with just big T-bars? If so, how was it?
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. [B][COLOR="Red"][URL="http://alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?t=42980"]PARTING OUT[/URL][/COLOR][/B]
1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!
1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
|

06-18-2007, 08:23 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,094
|
|
|
Not 33 mm, but bigger than stock 3.0 - forgot the actual number. Some time ago, but I don't recall it being like the coil-overs. It was a different car, so many other variables...
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
|

06-18-2007, 08:34 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 78
|
|
i don't get your point. are you saying that torsion bars+coil-overs are better than just coil-overs or better than just torsion bars of the same rate or that going with coil-overs on top of the torsion bars is the best option  we are not talking about any specific brands or specs, just setups in general
__________________
[URL="www.racingowls.com"]Rice University SAE[/URL]
|

06-18-2007, 09:30 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,094
|
|
|
You originally said/claimed that bigger torsion bars are a better option than a combination. I was/am simply trying to find out why you think so.
My comment above was in response to Grant's question.
Anyway, this is not going anywhere and lets not ruin this thread.
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
|

06-18-2007, 10:16 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,207
|
|
|
I favor the coil over/Torsion bar combination for the following reasons.
1. Large 33mm torsion bars are a huge pain in the butt to install and or make ride height changes.
2. Large 33mm and even 27mm bars in some cases lead to chassis cracking in post 1985.5 models.
3. I suspect in the case of the RS racing suspension vehicle weight will be lower compared with 33mm torsion bars and bigger rear springs. I don't have data on this but that RS kit is LIGHT.
I favor it over straight coil overs for the following reasons.
1. You have to do a lot of chassis strengthening to convert to pure coil overs. This adds weight. It's also complex, and if done incorrectly can lead to disaster (ie structuaral failures, reduced crash protection etc.)
|

06-18-2007, 10:48 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 78
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AR4me
You originally said/claimed that bigger torsion bars are a better option than a combination. I was/am simply trying to find out why you think so.
My comment above was in response to Grant's question.
Anyway, this is not going anywhere and lets not ruin this thread.
Jes
|
The reason I think torsion bars are the better option is because we get them as sponsorship from Performatek vs. buying/designing coil-overs. For us it is not a choice between buying one or the other. I thought I already said that
__________________
[URL="www.racingowls.com"]Rice University SAE[/URL]
|

06-19-2007, 10:12 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 97
|
|
|
Day 5: Pueblo Motorsports Park, Pueblo, CO (afternoon)
Because we ran so well in the morning, we ran much higher in the afternoon. Unfortunately I had a few miscues (i.e. some drifting action around 2:38...) during the afternoon run and didn't improve on my time from the morning. A few other people did, so we placed 46/72.
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/faDY17svDVw"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/faDY17svDVw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
-damen
__________________
Rice Society of Automotive Engineers
[url]www.RacingOwls.com[/url]
|
|