
05-16-2007, 08:26 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 349
|
|
|
IMO Carter has provided some great insight. If you can get 15-20 completely stock milanos out there with exception to some safer tires, you can see a train of 20 cars nose to tail race around within seconds of each other. Going to the RSR suspension is just going to run up costs and start temptaions of making more mods. I've driven bone stock cars on the track and it is actually really fun. You learn how to drive better since you are trying to scrub off as little speed as possible. It's not nearly as fun as driving my full built super but we have to remeber that the 75 pro series is suppose to be a low budget deal that allows more people to get out on the track.
__________________
Fabrizio
65 Giulia Sprint GTA
67 Giulia Super (Racecar)
67 Giulia Sprint GT Veloce
88 Milano Verde
|

05-16-2007, 08:50 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,954
|
|
I suppose Gold and Silver editions are "equal". The Platinum has LSD and ABS. The ABS functionality is easily disabled by disconnecting a wheel speed sensor, but LSD obviously isn't. The least expensive would be to allow Gold and Silver editions (disallowing LSD). Everything stock except for:
1. Safer tire
2. I would suggest having no limits for weight saving, except it cannot require new parts for the car, i.e. you can take things off but not replace with lighter components (ruling out Lexan, body panels, etc.).
3. Allow poly bushings since any 20-year old Milano that is headed for the race track is probably in need of bushings and poly will last longer than stock rubber bushings (= less maintenance).
Can you still get OEM shocks? This could be an issue since perhaps some of the 20-year old shocks are tired... I dunno, but I kind of like the idea of allowing the 4 shocks+springs as well as the 30 mm front sway bar of the RSR suspension. This will also make the cars look like race cars
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
|

05-16-2007, 08:52 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portsmouth, New Hampshire
Posts: 1,758
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant
I think coilovers are the best mainstream option. All of the performatek goodies still leave the chassis a bit wanting IMO.
|
Once again, your missing the point.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Carter
If everyone has the stock glass, why spend the time and money buying, measuring, cutting, and installing lexan? If all the cars are turning 2:20:00 at VIR and the rules allow some new part, all the cars will be running 2:18:00. What has been accomplished? Nothing regarding the actual racing...but the drivers had to spend money...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Carter
Spec E30 isn't about the cars, it's about the racing. Traditionally, we have a passion for a certain make or model of car. And that's great. But spec racing is about the competition and the fun of racing.
|
Its NOT about the cars. Its not about the cars. For SCCA class whatever its about the cars, for Spec Alfa its not about the cars.
SpecE30 works because it (1)gives the cars just enough suspension mods to be fun to drive,(2) easy to prep a car for, (3)hard to cheat, and (4)cheap to build. Its going to be really really hard to get Spec Alfa going if it isn't cheap and easy
I think there is a handful of RSR kits in the US, there are TONS of aftermarket swaybars,torsion bars, and springs on cars here making it easier to prep the car(2). The RSR kit, as you say, is adjustable thus taking the Spec out of it or making it easier to cheat. You can look at a torsion bar, sway bar or springs and know those aren't legal, making it hard to cheat (3). James hit it on the nose, RSR isnt cheaper(4)
Last edited by 81gtv6; 05-16-2007 at 08:55 AM.
|

05-16-2007, 09:07 AM
|
 |
OO≡≡≡<°>≡≡≡OO
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 773
|
|
I agree: options like allowing the RSR kit in could kill this off. Poly, for practicality reasons is fine. ABS and power steering delete could be allowed. Sway bars? Dunno: I could be swayed either way on that one
You would need a (high) min weight limit. Like SpecE30 has.
Lift as much of the SpecE30 rule book as possible.
Didn't someone mention 'it's NOT about the cars'?
Did y'all know that in Ireland they used to race a 24h Citroen 2CV competition. It was spec. They leaned. Big time. And the racing was close. Cheap too.
__________________
'85 GTV6
|

05-16-2007, 09:53 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northridge, California
Posts: 6,019
|
|
|
My thoughts:
Engine: Stock 2.5 liter V6 only. Have selected shops in selected areas build/check motors and “seal” them before being allowed to race. Bigger radiator and oil coolers can be added. Air intake can be modified.
Gearbox/Rear End: Original rear end to the car must be used. You can lock or replace with a LSD. All cars must run same final drive ratio.
Brakes: drilled/slotted rotors allowed, rear discs may be changed to vented, r compound pads allowed, calipers must me OEM, braided lines allowed. Front fog lights can be turned into brake ducts. Brake bias valve can be added.
Exhaust: Find a spec affordable tubular header or just leave the stock manifolds. Like someone said earlier in the thread, maybe find a place that can be the sole manufacture Anything after that is open to the owner’s choice of exhaust.
Shocks: Koni “classic” or “sport”
Other Suspension: List a specific torsion bars, springs, and sway bars that can be used. Nothing that needs to be modified to be installed would be allowed, just straight bolt in. Poly bushings/spherical bearings ok where applicable.
Tires/Wheels: Figure out a spec tire and allow different size wheels as long as the overall diameter and width is the same.
Safety: Roll cage, fuel cell, fire system, and power switch are mandatory. Maybe work with Autopower on making them the “spec” cage so all cars are equally stiffened. It wouldn’t be fair is someone had a $5K custom cages opposed to someone’s $1000 bolt in Autopower.
Body: Cannot be modified from stock except Verde rear lip kits added (cuz they look cool). All the panels must remain original. Weight can be removed from anywhere in the car.
Misc: Interior may be stripped, front windshield must remain glass while all others can be changed to plastic. Battery and fuel cell can strategically be placed anywhere in the car.
It is important to stick to and enforce the rules while making it “affordable” for everyone. With that said I might be interested. I have a 2.5 Milano sitting in storage.
I guess the next big thing would be to choose what groups to run with. For the west coast, I think AROSC events should be definately considered as one of the options.
__________________
Anthony Rimicci | 64 Giulia Spider | 65 GTA | 68 GT Jr.
|

05-16-2007, 10:01 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,954
|
|
I like Anthony's layout if we take the route away from basically stock. It should allow RSR - which is simply about changing the spring rates front and rear, shocks front and rear, and the front sway bar - these few changes make a tremendous difference in the car, PLEASE...  The "car" Anthony laid out will cost you a fair amount if build buy a shop, but you can do it "affordably" yourself (of course, everything is relative. Though, don't expect to go racing like that for $3k).
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
Last edited by AR4me; 05-16-2007 at 10:06 AM.
|

05-16-2007, 11:26 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Jose
Posts: 430
|
|
The cost for the BMW e30 Nasa Spec suspension is about $1300 retail. It consists of Bilsteins, H & R race springs, and swaybars. I checked out places that'll sell you a package. http://www.turnermotorsport.com/html...T_ID=SPECE30SK
Hmmm, I would think a series running 15" wheels, 2.5 milanos with stock engines, no ABS, and a kit like the RS with just the coilovers and a front swaybar would be pretty fun. That would only be $2k usd for the suspension which isn't to bad compared to the NASA e30 suspension. Oh yeah, stock brakes with only pads allowed. The idea here is cheap and similar cars for everybody.
Here is a link to the e30 rulebook: http://www.nasaproracing.com/rules/SpecE30.pdf
It would be fun to race Spec Milanos, but what's the point when they already have the Spec E30 and Spec 944. I think we would have a hard time gathering all the loonies together in one place for this to ever work.
__________________
Louis
1987 75 RS 24V
1987 Milano Verde ex RS Racing Special (1st RS kit in USA!!!)
2004 BMW M3
2002 Porsche Boxster
Last edited by Potenziato; 05-16-2007 at 11:32 AM.
|

05-16-2007, 12:02 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,480
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81gtv6
Once again, your missing the point.
Its NOT about the cars. Its not about the cars. For SCCA class whatever its about the cars, for Spec Alfa its not about the cars.
SpecE30 works because it (1)gives the cars just enough suspension mods to be fun to drive,(2) easy to prep a car for, (3)hard to cheat, and (4)cheap to build. Its going to be really really hard to get Spec Alfa going if it isn't cheap and easy
I think there is a handful of RSR kits in the US, there are TONS of aftermarket swaybars,torsion bars, and springs on cars here making it easier to prep the car(2). The RSR kit, as you say, is adjustable thus taking the Spec out of it or making it easier to cheat. You can look at a torsion bar, sway bar or springs and know those aren't legal, making it hard to cheat (3). James hit it on the nose, RSR isnt cheaper(4)
|
OK, let's not be blind here. Spec Miata and Spec E30 only allow race spring and shocks (THAT'S RACE SPRINGS -- H&R Cup for the E30's) and I think adjustable sway bars aswell.
I drove my friend's E30 that he was building up to E30 Spec. It handles WORLDS better than my Verde with the mods listed in my signature. Sure my car sounds better, and has way more feel through the wheel, but out on the track I keep wishing it was more balanced...like a Miata or E30...and I've driven both. I can see why the spec formula worked so well, they're starting out with cars that are inherently well balanced and are fun to toss around the track. It's my opinion that Milanos aren't that in their stock form. Maybe a 75 TS, I dunno, but a stock Milano isn't so great at the limit.
So, why would we bother with a Spec Milano series if the cars aren't even fun to drive!? The engine sounds good, the steering is great, the throttle response is spot on, but who's going to notice that when driving at 10/10th's? Very few people. I'm just one person, but I wouldn't be too thrilled to dump thousands into a race car if it isn't going to drive like a race car. Of course the competition will be fabulous, no debate on that, but the cars themselves..... I think Spec E30 would be more fun....
And before you jump to any assumptions 81gtv6, you should read my posts more carefully before you attack me. I did say that adjustable spring rates would be an additional factor of the RSR coilovers, but I'm not saying lets have coilovers b/c of the adjustable spring rates. I've always known that the RSR coilovers were a good thing, I just didn't like what it does with the front end geometry, but w/e, it doesn't matter. I've ridden in Potenziato's Milano with RSR coilovers, and it handles like a race car should, not the understeering pig my car ias at this moment. I have essentially done all of the Shankle upgrades (RSR sway bas in lieu of shankle sways...diameters are very close).
So, I'm sure you guys all know how well balanced a Miata and E30 is right? Do you think that might have been a factor when choosing the cars, huh? Why haven't any Ford Taurus spec series, or Acura Legend spec series sprouted up? The cars are plenty cheap and plentiful...maybe it's b/c they wouldn't be fun too much fun to drive?
I agree that for this to take off, the cars must be cheap. But I just don't think this suspension area is aplace to skimp out. Maybe not RSR coilovers, but atleast something very firm.
From an E30 forum, here are some various spring rates E30's use:
OEM e30 M3: 140/250
H&R Sport : 182/343
H&R Race : 315/570
Eibach Pro-Kit : 148/275-343(progressive)
IE Stage 3 : Same as H&R Race, stiffer under compression at front
The H&R RACE springs is what my friend is using on his spec car....315/570...versus my 190/154 rates? These are racing Milanos right? Not some dual purpose car right?
I think some of the people that feel we should be driving cars with a setup like mine below haven't driven a Milano with 27mm torsion bars or been in a car with RSR coilovers. For a pure track car, RSR is worth the extra money. I have seen videos of GTV6's with 27mm torsion bars and sways...they seem much less roll prone. I think it's partly the lower CG, but mainly the fact that my torsion bars are way longer than GTV6's.....so 27mm isn't as big of a deal anymore on a Milano.
Knowing that, we have then two options in America:
Performatek--
33mm Torsion bars $649
Race springs -- Price not listed
Race valved Konis -- $345 each (X4)
Sway bars -- about $190 per end.
So that's....atleast $2600 (I'm going to guess the custom rear spring are going to be $200 and up) for all the necessary items for race spring rates..not including poly bushing or anything.
Where as the necessary RS stuff:
Coilovers - $1800, front sway bar (which includes the heim joints) $240
AR ricambi isn't really an option, they have trouble getting parts out in a timely fashion (first hand experience).
"It's not about the car, it's not about the car." Then why are we bothering with Milanos if it's not about the car? There's an existing E30 spec series out there that is alot of fun.
And once again, if the cars aren't fun to drive, there's no point. Spec Miata and E30 are going to give you more fun for your dollar.
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. PARTING OUT
1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!
1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Last edited by Grant; 05-16-2007 at 01:05 PM.
|

05-16-2007, 12:16 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,480
|
|
|
I think the most pressing issue is, where are these cars going to run?
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. PARTING OUT
1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!
1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
|

05-16-2007, 01:00 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,954
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant
I think the most pressing issue is, where are these cars going to run?
|
For southern and central california I think AROSC is an obvious place. Particular if they get the collaboration with TCRA going More AROSC Track Dates?, so that we would have more events. If the bay area Milano/GTV6 track guys are interested in this, we could field maybe 10 cars. No? Until then we are fortunate to have the Alfa Cup 
Jes
__________________
87 Milano Verde - daily driver - Juliet
87 Milano 3.0 Motronic - budget race car - Roxanne
87 Milano 3.7 24v - race car
(Repeating what I suggest or do is at your own risk - be critical)
|

05-16-2007, 02:07 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SF Gay Area
Posts: 1,641
|
|
|
E30 more fun to drive? What??!!! Grant, talk to da hand!
My sister had an E30 325i when she was here. IMO stock E30 325i suck as much as a stock Milano. Actually I preferred the Milano.
Personally not interested in Spec Milano, but this discussion is getting interesting.
Popcorn anyone?
|

05-16-2007, 02:38 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,480
|
|
|
Erm...I should say "handles better". I meant fun to drive on the track. Around town -- No contest! The cars themselves are actually pretty bland and boring IMO. The I6 is pretty smooth though.
And my opinion of good handling is a predictable car at the limit that is willing to turn-in, and rotate the rear. The Milano is very safe and predictable, I like what it does on lift throttle situations, but turn in it does not (more Yoda). Stock E30's are actually a little dicey at the limit, as soon as you lift up on the throttle, the semi-trailing arm rear suspension gets crazy toe and camber changes, and OUT goes the tail. But, once stiff spring are on an E30, much less camber and toe change happens out back and they become VERY nice.
This is all IMO IMO IMO! Yaddadadamean?
XFT, for one, says the Milanos are the best handling cars in the WORLD!
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. PARTING OUT
1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!
1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Last edited by Grant; 05-16-2007 at 02:43 PM.
|

05-16-2007, 02:48 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 118
|
|
|
It seems to me that the RSR kit is a major point that is demanded by the members who seem somewhat likely to actually field cars. Fair enough, maybe it is worth it. I have never been in an RSR equiped Milano, maybe that is why I think that stock is good enough. I do think that a stock milano is a very fun car to drive. At least my stock Verde is.
I think that other areas should be kept as simple as possible. The cars should all have the same diff and final drive ratio. Since Platinum boxes are rare as can be, they would seem to me to be out. If open diffs on 155 hp cars are not fun enough to make them worth driving, then allow a welded diff.
SZ rear brake conversion is expensive: $175x2 for the disks, $155 for the spacer kit, and I dont know how much for a set of rebuilt calipers. It might not be a good idea to allow this conversion since it would drive up the price of the car. Then again, it wouldnt be very fun if the brakes were not reliable and people had to bleed their brakes all the time. Spec Milano would be lighter than stock, due to AC, PS, heater core, carpet, headliner, and sound deadening deletes. That might help a little with the rear brakes, but I dont have enough experience running my car to make this call. Maybe wrapping the exhaust near the transaxle and running cooling ducts, along with high performance pads and fluid, might make stock rear brakes bearable.
Exhaust- Stock manifolds for sure. I think stock manifolds are fairly well matched for a stock 2.5, so there are not massive gains to be had from this change anyway. Behind the manifolds, I am not sure. Requiring stock appeals to me because it should be the cheapest. I dont think that changing mufflers gives anyone an advantage, however. Maybe just require stock pipe dimensions?
Polycarbonate windows? Not worth it in my opinion. This mod would just serve to make all cars more expensive and just the same ammount faster.
Body modification shouldnt be permitted either. Even with a minimum weight requirement. A car with Evo bumpers and a fiberglass hood and trunk lid could be brought back to minimum weight with some balast added on the floor behind the driver. It would be a faster car, however, due to the weight being lower and more centered. It would also be a much more expensive car.
| |