#286 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 12:12 PM
Echo Leader's Avatar
Echo Leader Echo Leader is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 834
"Spring rates"? Or "wheel rate"? I've always seen T-Bar rates expressed as "wheel" due to the lever arm contribution to the equation, but most coils are "spring". Comparing these two items without the motion ratio will negate any meaningful relationship between one of your setups and the other.

So what is the motion ratio on the Milano (same for GTV6 I'm assuming?)? If it's ration low, a 4X increase in RSR coil spring rate might only be 2.?X in wheel rate...
__________________
James
1984 GTV6
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #287 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 12:29 PM
genericwood's Avatar
genericwood genericwood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant View Post
Even with the dropped spindles and huge sway bars and torsion bars, I was still rolling like a pig on tight turns. While the camber gain was fine, the center of gravity would shift so far onto the outside wheels, it would overload them and I would lose grip prematurely. After increasing the spring rates 2-3X over my old setup ( and 4-6X over stock!) I was finally happy.
Grant, I'm glad you have found a set up you really like. But in the interest of accuracy, I have to take exception to a portion of your post. As long as your camber gain is proper, the amount the chassis rolls isn't that important. This does not lead to "overloading of the outside wheels". Weight transfer is a function of CG, track width, corner radius and speed. Unless you put the weight lower in the car or change the track, the amount of weight you transfer to the outside tires doesn't change. There are lots of reasons you may want to limit roll, but preventing weight transfer isn't one of them!

Erik
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #288 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 01:27 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,573
Send a message via AIM to Grant
What you're saying is correct, but according to Carol Smith, the roll related to a soft car moves the CG over the outside wheels, adding another factor to the "roll does not cause weight transfer" saying. It doesn't, but when the CG moves, more weight does move over to the outside wheels because of the shifting of the CG, and not just the cornering force.

I respect your experience racing over my experience screwing around on the internet and doing minor events. So, I'll double check my point for accuracy in my Tune to Win book later tonight when I have more time.
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. [B][COLOR="Red"][URL="http://alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?t=42980"]PARTING OUT[/URL][/COLOR][/B]

1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!

1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles

Last edited by Grant; 07-24-2008 at 01:34 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #289 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 01:31 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,573
Send a message via AIM to Grant
James, as usual, your points are valid. I do mean spring rate. The Shankle catalog lists the torsion bars as a spring rate to the best of my knowledge. How they actually calculated this, I do not know. I do know the listed rate for my shorter 27mm torsion bars was something to the effect of 190lbs/inch. The spring rate of the RS kit with my 11KG (actual rates are quoted as N/m or N/mm, I forget...no matter, conversion is multiply by .98, so close enough to estimate) front spring is around 650lb/inch. I'm using the amatauer approach of comparing spring rates to spring rates, which is really like comparing apples to oranges, but hey, they're both fruit right?
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. [B][COLOR="Red"][URL="http://alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?t=42980"]PARTING OUT[/URL][/COLOR][/B]

1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!

1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #290 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 01:46 PM
genericwood's Avatar
genericwood genericwood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant View Post
What you're saying is correct, but according to Carol Smith, the roll related to a soft car moves the CG over the outside wheels, adding another factor to the "roll does not cause weight transfer" saying..
Technically, you are correct. A very large amount of roll will (to a very small degree) move the CG laterally. I was only suggesting that this is a very minor component and not contributing much to the "overloading" of the outside wheels. The biggest reason to limit roll is that most suspension systems don't do a very good job of maintaining good geometry at extremes of droop and bump travel. By the way, the race experience isn't worth much. What little I know on the subject I learned from books and friends who know more than me!

Erik
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #291 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 08:14 AM
Echo Leader's Avatar
Echo Leader Echo Leader is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 834
Good catch on the weight transfer issue, Erik. I skimmed right over that. I think I agree with you both on this one. It seems as though it might be as case where Smith himself might say "It happens, but it almost doesn't matter". I want to go look up what he actually says now...

Anyhow, Grant, I'm surprised (a bit) that Shankle was quoting a spring rate for a torsion bar. I phrase it that way, as I would think Shankle knew what they were doing, but who knows if they wanted to confuse their general readership by introducing the concept of wheel rate vs. the far more commonly discussed spring rate.

As confirmation, my calculations for a 27.3mm torsion bar on my GTV6 show a wheel rate of 191.85lbs/in. Now it seems as though the motion ratio for the GTV6 (and the Milano, I suppose) is around .49...That means that your 650lbs/in spring rate RSR setup is really a 317.75lbs/in wheel rate. This would be essentially equal to a 31mm torsion bar. More fun comparisons, I think the OEM torsions on the GTV6 (short ones) were 23.5mm? If my math is all correct, your current setup is almost exactly 3x this in wheel rate.
__________________
James
1984 GTV6
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #292 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 02:36 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,573
Send a message via AIM to Grant
James, my coilovers don't mount exactly in the stock location. The wheel rate should be higher than you calculated.

From post #122:

116 & 119 Alfetta/GTV 6/Milano Torsion bar specifications:

GTV6 Early model:
stock bar:
Rate -- 96lbs/in Diameter -- 23.5mm Length--989mm
Sport Bar:
Rate -- 134lb/in Diameter -- 25.4mm Length -- 989mm
SS Bar:
Rate -- 179lb/in Diameter -- 27.3mm " " -- 989mm

GTV6 Late and Milano:
Stock bar:
Rate -- 93lbs/in Diameter -- 22.8mm Length -- 932mm
*No wonder I hit my oil sump so often with the stock setup!
Sport:
Rate -- 143lbs/in Diameter -- 25.4mm Length -- ""
SS:
Rate -- 191lbs/in Diameter -- 27.3mm Length -- ""
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. [B][COLOR="Red"][URL="http://alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?t=42980"]PARTING OUT[/URL][/COLOR][/B]

1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!

1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #293 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 04:28 PM
Echo Leader's Avatar
Echo Leader Echo Leader is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 834
Oh, neat....where do they mount?

I might have to take exception with those numbers....I think they used to total length of the torsion bar for the wheel rate calculation. I'm pretty sure you'll want to use an 'effective' length measurement from the 'insides' of the splines....where did those numbers come from?
__________________
James
1984 GTV6
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



AlfaBB Blog Articles

Advertisement


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright 2002-2008 AlfaBB.com All Rights Reserved.


An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com