#1 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 83
Please help clear up my misundersatndings about 6c2500s

I am under the impression that the 6c2500s were officially introduced as such at the Berlin Auto show in early 1938.

I also understand that prior to this time, some 6c2300Bs were enlarged (probably by Ferrari) in displacement to 2500ccs, and that the 3 carb, rather than the 2 carb intake manifold was installed..and that these engines might also have had different compression and cams than the 6c2300Bs. As far as I am aware, these cars and motors should be called T256s.

I have seen the 1940 Ala Spessas designated as T256s in some publications, but if they were not built until 1940 (or maybe 1939), why would they be called T256s and not 6c2500s, if the official 6c2500 introduction was in 1938?

I also understand that there might have been some technical differences between the pre-war 6c2500SS cars and motors and the T256 cars and motors, but have never seen any kind of clear explanation of exactly what that might have been.

Thanks for any input...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:57 AM
twoliterlover's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 648
Unhappy Where is Dr. Etceterini when we need him?

Banned or not, he still knows what's what! Do you have his email address? try it! -- dretceterini@hotmail.com
__________________
[B]JAY NUXOLL [/B][EMAIL="jay@alfanut.com"], seriously Alfa diseased and ancient OLD Two Liter Lover, put together Seattle area's Northwest Alfa Romeo Club in 1965, and still feebly tries to tend a teeny sacred flame to his serpent mistress in the [B]ALFA G'RAJ MAHAL[/B], a home garage temple with more Alfa cars and parts than he dare list because of the disapproval of his shamed and chagrined family. (425) 641-2600.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 11:07 AM
Zunige's Avatar
In the Spider's Nest
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nutley/NJ & Middletown/OH, USA
Posts: 5,487
Send a message via ICQ to Zunige
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoliterlover View Post
Banned or not, he still knows what's what! Do you have his email address? try it! -- dretceterini@hotmail.com
Jay,
Ritmo100S is the former dretceterini... Yes, he was banned, and he got back on the BB with another user-id, which got banned as well, then another id after that, etc., etc... until this most recent id: Ritmo100S... (which seems to be holding...)

Best regards,
__________________
Enrique
Spider 74, 84 & 87
164 91S, 93L & 95Q
Milano 88 Verde


Co-chairman 2011 AROC-USA Convention:
Alfas in the Bluegrass, Lexington, KY, USA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 11:36 AM
twoliterlover's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 648
Exclamation It Can't Be!

Why would he be asking such a question? We are all lost!!!!!
__________________
[B]JAY NUXOLL [/B][EMAIL="jay@alfanut.com"], seriously Alfa diseased and ancient OLD Two Liter Lover, put together Seattle area's Northwest Alfa Romeo Club in 1965, and still feebly tries to tend a teeny sacred flame to his serpent mistress in the [B]ALFA G'RAJ MAHAL[/B], a home garage temple with more Alfa cars and parts than he dare list because of the disapproval of his shamed and chagrined family. (425) 641-2600.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 12:45 PM
gtv2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 654
The 6C2500 was presented in 1939, not 1938, as for any source I know, see Fusi p381.

The "Ala spessa" and Spider siluro were also prepared for the 1939 Tobruk-Tripoli, earlier in the year than the presentation of the 6C2500 berlina. The first articles show indeed the Ala spessa.

The "prototype" of the 6C2500SS, or T256, both designation are used simultaneously in period publications, was indeed a modified 6C2300B MM.

Early 256/6C2500SSs show detail features identifying them as having been built on 6C2300B chassis.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 08:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 83
You are correct. According to Anselmi it was 1939; not 1938 when the 6c2500 was shown at the Berlin show. The dates of the show were February 17th through March 5th, so the Ala Spessas must have actually been built in 1938.

Here is a link to a guidebook from that car show I just found on the internet! Stangely, no metion of Alfa Romeo.

1939 Berlin Auto Show Guidebook

Also, if the T256s were modified 6c2300Bs, shouldn't they have serial numbers beginning with 8 and not 9? All the cars in the list in Anselmi's 6c2500 book in the section T256/6c2500SS begin with 9...

Last edited by Ritmo100S; 09-02-2009 at 09:06 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:02 AM
gtv2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritmo100S View Post
Also, if the T256s were modified 6c2300Bs, shouldn't they have serial numbers beginning with 8 and not 9?
They don't. It's a fact. Except for one, which I would describe as "prototype" (but it may also be considered as an updated customer car), which seems to have been transformed after it was already a complete car with a chassis number starting with 8. It is thus not a proper 256.

Some early 256s show features of 6C2300B chassis, that's also an observable fact.

Last edited by gtv2000; 09-03-2009 at 02:05 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 83
What are your thoughts on the 6c2300B MMs that appeared at the auctions last year and this year, at Pebble Beach?

Both last years Oscar Davis black car (which sold for something like $2.5M), and this years unrestored red car (which the seller had for over 40 years and was bid up to over $1.5M and did not sell), have chassis and motor numbers beginning with 8, but have the 3 carburetor intake manifolds (the motor in this car is not the original, but the original motor was included, and it's S/N also starts with an 8). I have no idea of the internal configuration of the motors in either car, or in the original motor in the red car, which was included as a "spare".

I am checking with Mr.Callagaris of the 6c2500 register, to see what information he might have...

Last edited by Ritmo100S; 09-03-2009 at 09:27 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:28 AM
gtv2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 654
It has a 6C2300B chassis number, it is presented as a 6C2300B, it has a coachwork style tying with a 6C2300B, so what's the matter?

Have you never seen Giulietta Normales fitted with double Webers? Does it usually make them "Veloces"? I understand that some seller would like so, but nothing like that here.

The seller of this 6C2300B certainly won't cast a "made by Ferrari" history around it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 83
I certainly agree with you that the 3 carburetor intakes could have been added later, and that neither of these 2 cars maight have been originally built as T256s or pre-war 6c2500SSs, but do we know this for certain?

Is it possible that some "real" T256s or pre-war 6c2500SSs actually have serial numbers beginning with an 8? I think so...

Don't you think it is possible that some of the 106 (according to Fusi) 6c2300B MMs were not actually completed as 6c2300B MMs, and were renumbered with a S/N starting with a 9, and actually "became" 6c2500SSs or T256s??

Last edited by Ritmo100S; 09-03-2009 at 09:37 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:51 AM
gtv2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritmo100S View Post
I certainly agree with you that the 3 carburetor intakes could have been added later, and that neither of these 2 cars maight have been originally built as T256s or pre-war 6c2500SSs, but do we know this for certain?
Certain? I've never heard that they even might have T256 features, and in one of the two cases, I certainly would have been told if it had.

Quote:
Is it possible that some "real" T256s or pre-war 6c2500SSs actually have serial numbers beginning with an 8? I think so...
As usual, the same mantras come again and again when we deal with obsessions. I've replied above: yes, ONE 6C2300B MM has been updated at the time into a 6C2500SS/356, and retained its "815xxx" chassis number.

Quote:
Don't you think it is possible that some of the 106 (according to Fusi) 6c2300B MMs were not actually completed as 6c2300B MMs, and were renumbered with a S/N starting with a 9, and actually "became" 6c2500SSs or T256s??
I cannot tell. I believe that Fusi's accounts were based on production files, which means that the 106 2.3 should have been produced and numbered as such. I would lend toward the reasonable guess that there were 6C2300B MM frames lying unused , and that those were converted into he first 256s, while having not been previously numbered in the 815xxx range. Knowing the
common usage of renumbering frames at Alfa in those years, it could also be plausible that factory racers 6C2300B MMs could have been transformed and subsequently renumbered. But that would mean that such early 256s should show a double chassis number, one in the 815 range, another in the 915. I'm aware of double numbered 256s, but with both numbers in the 915 range.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 12:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtv2000 View Post
Certain? I've never heard that they even might have T256 features, and in one of the two cases, I certainly would have been told if it had.
Both last years black car and this years red car had 3 carbs, rather than the 2 carbs as applicable to 6c2300B MMs. I do not know, nor did I check out if either car had any other features which in any way would identify the cars as T256s. It seems a bit odd to me that anyone would aribtraily put on 3 carbs when trying to sell multi-million dollar cars.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



AlfaBB Blog Articles

Advertisement


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright 2002-2008 AlfaBB.com All Rights Reserved.


An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com