
01-22-2008, 09:56 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 45
|
|
|
I think the solution with a programable map Via USB for the 123 system solves all the issues (As mentioned by Richard on pg 4). Please let us know when it is avaliable, as I for one will buy one immediatley - it solves the valid points that Max rasied regarding the duplication of curves and also the secrecy about the 16 curves in the system
PS is it planned to have 16 different curves that can be user programmed in the USB version ? If not at least 3 or 4 should be user programable.
__________________
1973 GTV
2007 Chevrolet Caprice SS (6 litre V8)
Previous Cars-82 GTV-84 90-82 Sud
Last edited by geofd; 01-22-2008 at 10:07 AM.
|

01-22-2008, 10:56 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbia SC
Posts: 1,285
|
|
|
Which curve is secret?
__________________
Ed Prytherch
79 Spider Veloce
88 Milano Verde
88 Milano Verde
|

01-22-2008, 11:54 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5
|
|
|
Hi Alfafans,
maybe i do not understand your problems with setting the igitionpoint.
About half year ago my garage installed me a small box and programmed this on the motortester. I still have a original distributor, where they only changed something.
I the end i had more power and the whole engine feels much more aggressive; also ideling is better.
Also the price was not so much. Why you have to change the whole disrubutor, when you can solve the problem with a small box?
Christian
|

01-22-2008, 06:11 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 184
|
|
|
Christian, maybe the garage installed a condenser on the side of the distributor to help? If you have electronic ignition, maybe they put in a new "brain"? We need more details.
|

01-23-2008, 01:57 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 112
|
|
Anyone has experience with the RML ARPI 4101 R system?
Untitled
|

01-23-2008, 04:10 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbia SC
Posts: 1,285
|
|
|
I had one on my GTV that I sold last year. It was installed by the PO. The car had some idle issues that I think may have been partly due to a lot of ignition advance at low rpm. Otherwise, I had no problems with it.
__________________
Ed Prytherch
79 Spider Veloce
88 Milano Verde
88 Milano Verde
|

01-23-2008, 09:00 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 489
|
|
|
I have an old Allison unit with a Marelli distributor for it sitting in a box at my house. I have never run it on an engine. Anyone have any idea how/where it compares to these various curves?
Cheers,
Karl
__________________
[B]Have:[/B] 1969 1750 GTV under restoration
1969 1750 Berlina
1968 Giulia Sprint GTV (very rough, no motor)
[B]Had:[/B] 1982 GTV6 3.0 w/4.10 rear, Stebro (imported engine from UK in 2002) -- Rear-ended 8/2004.
1988 Milano Verde
[B]Non-Alfas:[/B]1984 Volvo 244
|

01-23-2008, 10:08 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbia SC
Posts: 1,285
|
|
|
The standard Marelli curves are published. Shankle and maybe other vendors re-curved them by modifying the centrifugal mechanism.
Take a look at the Marelli model number. You may find the curve for it in one of Papajam's posts. The old Shankle catalog shows several of them.
__________________
Ed Prytherch
79 Spider Veloce
88 Milano Verde
88 Milano Verde
|

01-23-2008, 10:25 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5
|
|
|
The weights from the distributer are fixed, that they can not move anymore.
Then they connect the installed electronicbox with the computer and can program the advance however you want. On the motortester (dynojet) you can see how the engine reacts. At the end you have at every range the best possible result. I only know that the engine feels so much better and you even can see it on the diagramms before and after.
Christian
|

01-23-2008, 10:31 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 489
|
|
|
Hmm I see. I didn't realize the Allison unit was simply a replacement for the points only. Cheers
Karl
__________________
[B]Have:[/B] 1969 1750 GTV under restoration
1969 1750 Berlina
1968 Giulia Sprint GTV (very rough, no motor)
[B]Had:[/B] 1982 GTV6 3.0 w/4.10 rear, Stebro (imported engine from UK in 2002) -- Rear-ended 8/2004.
1988 Milano Verde
[B]Non-Alfas:[/B]1984 Volvo 244
|

01-24-2008, 12:52 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Madrid (SPAIN)
Posts: 198
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTChristian
The weights from the distributer are fixed, that they can not move anymore.
Then they connect the installed electronicbox with the computer and can program the advance however you want. On the motortester (dynojet) you can see how the engine reacts. At the end you have at every range the best possible result. I only know that the engine feels so much better and you even can see it on the diagramms before and after.
Christian
|
Christian, do you have pictures of this device? Who sell it and how much is it? Is there any information about it? (web, catalogue ...)
__________________
[I]Carlos
[COLOR=Red]Alfa Spider Veloce 2.0[/COLOR][/I]
|

01-24-2008, 08:24 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 489
|
|
If you're a bit of a DIY'er and don't mind the non-original look, I think this unit, combined with a Ford EDIS module is pretty trick.
Autosport Labs
Price is good, but then you'll put a fair time into installing it.
Karl
__________________
[B]Have:[/B] 1969 1750 GTV under restoration
1969 1750 Berlina
1968 Giulia Sprint GTV (very rough, no motor)
[B]Had:[/B] 1982 GTV6 3.0 w/4.10 rear, Stebro (imported engine from UK in 2002) -- Rear-ended 8/2004.
1988 Milano Verde
[B]Non-Alfas:[/B]1984 Volvo 244
|

07-24-2008, 05:44 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 39
|
|
|
I had one fitted last week to my Euro 2000GTV. I had a flat spot < 2000RPM and advancing enough to cure that caused over-advance at high revs. The distributor was incorrect for the car, from an Alfetta apparently, so there seemed no point (no pun intended) fitting Pertronix etc. FWIW I fitted new leads and a new standard coil at the same time. 123 reccommend a new coil unless you are really sure the old is one has never been cooked.
Outome: she now starts very well, maybe taking up to 3 quick attempts with minimal choke, and is much smoother all round.the torque < 2000 is still a little weak but much better driveability ie I can blip the throttle to DDC into 2nd (lack of proverbial synchro!), and I may try a tiny bit more advance say 1deg. and will also ask supplier for another curve (other than 'A') which has same max. advance but a little more aggressive at low revs. (BTW anyone know the answer to that?).
Hope that helps.
Last edited by PiperYelloGTV2k; 07-24-2008 at 05:49 AM.
|

07-24-2008, 07:26 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbia SC
Posts: 1,285
|
|
|
Curve "A" is very slow. I suggest that you try Curve "1". I am currently running that curve. The Shankle curve is a bit more aggressive and gives good fuel consumption, but watch out for pinging around 3000 rpm. I have run all three curves with 36 degrees full advance and "1" at 38 and 40 degrees.
__________________
Ed Prytherch
79 Spider Veloce
88 Milano Verde
88 Milano Verde
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|