 |
|

03-24-2007, 07:26 AM
|
 |
AlfaBB Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Austin, TX , USA
Posts: 2,043
|
|
|
You're doing a fantastic job. Keep the pictures coming!!
__________________
Peter
Currently:
'67 Duetto
'69 Euro 1750 GTV
Previously:
'76 Alfasud Ti/'75 GT Junior/'87 Alfa 33
'91 Alfa 75/'95 Alfa 164/'79 Alfa Spider
|

03-24-2007, 09:38 AM
|
 |
Christopher Boles
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: At the other end of the state
Posts: 1,931
|
|
$100? That was a bargain for how clean the part came out. If you have gone this far, you might want to look into the rocker panels to see if there is rust inside. That $2000 for the whole car might start to look pretty inexpensive.
I am also enjoying the thread watching one of my cars twins being put back on the road. Watching all of these cars being restored has me wanting to make a rotisserie now and doing my GTV up right and not half baked when it comes to the body prep.
Are you going with a glue in or rubber gasket windsheild?
|

03-24-2007, 10:37 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyo.
Posts: 222
|
|
|
Rossano --
Great looking job, thanks for sharing the story.
But I have a question, especially for all the '69 GTV aficiandos here: is this not a '71? That engine block number may indicate a '69, but the large tail-lights and maybe the flushnose (weren't '69s step-nose?) indicate a '71, at least to me. I look to be corrected, perhaps.
Otherwise, Rossano, lead on!!
__________________
Mark
'67 Super
'89 Spider Quad
'67 GTV (years ago)
'50 XK120 (years ago)
|

03-24-2007, 01:27 PM
|
 |
AlfaBB Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Austin, TX , USA
Posts: 2,043
|
|
|
The tail lights are not large, it's got the small tail lights, definitely looks like a '69....and no, 69's did not have the stepnose anymore
__________________
Peter
Currently:
'67 Duetto
'69 Euro 1750 GTV
Previously:
'76 Alfasud Ti/'75 GT Junior/'87 Alfa 33
'91 Alfa 75/'95 Alfa 164/'79 Alfa Spider
|

03-25-2007, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oakville
Posts: 768
|
|
Thanks for the encouraging words guys.
Quote:
Originally Posted by velocedoc
$100? That was a bargain for how clean the part came out. If you have gone this far, you might want to look into the rocker panels to see if there is rust inside. That $2000 for the whole car might start to look pretty inexpensive.
I am also enjoying the thread watching one of my cars twins being put back on the road. Watching all of these cars being restored has me wanting to make a rotisserie now and doing my GTV up right and not half baked when it comes to the body prep.
Are you going with a glue in or rubber gasket windsheild?
|
Velocedoc...the 69's came with the rubber gasket windshields...I think the 2000 GTV's had the glue in style. As for acid dipping the whole car....yeah it looks tempting to have a completely stripped/clean car to work with but in my case the heavy rust is contained to floors only and other areas have surface rust so I didn't want to get into the potential "acid seepage issues" related to dipping...also saving that extra $2K on dipping will allow that me to put that money into the paint job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfonse22
Rossano --
Great looking job, thanks for sharing the story.
But I have a question, especially for all the '69 GTV aficiandos here: is this not a '71? That engine block number may indicate a '69, but the large tail-lights and maybe the flushnose (weren't '69s step-nose?) indicate a '71, at least to me. I look to be corrected, perhaps.
Otherwise, Rossano, lead on!!
|
Alfonse2...I'm not the expert on the variants for the GTV's but as far as I know, the 69 US GTV came with the smaller red over red tailights and the flushnose. In 70-71 they switched over to the larger tailight lens and hanging petals (twin Bonaldi boosters were discontinued), they also introduced the Fuel cut-off switch on the SPICA pump and other changes I'm sure were introduced.
|

03-25-2007, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gifu, Japan
Posts: 1,137
|
|
Well, here's my 2 cents:
I am sorry but I fail to see larger taillights anywhere in this thread... The taillights on Rossano (1750GT) 's car are DEFINITELY the earlier, smaller ones. If you are not familiar with them, the easiest way is to see whether the backup lights are integrated into the taillight assemblies. If they do, they're the larger, later lights for sure (the earlier cars have single rectangular backup light under the bumper).
Regarding the step-nose and the smooth-nose, all 1750s are smooth-nosed, regardless of the model year (the 1750 series debuted in Brussels show back in 1968). The GT1300Juniors, on the other hand, retained the step nose until late 1970, when the 1750 series 2 was introduced.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfonse22
Rossano --
Great looking job, thanks for sharing the story.
But I have a question, especially for all the '69 GTV aficiandos here: is this not a '71? That engine block number may indicate a '69, but the large tail-lights and maybe the flushnose (weren't '69s step-nose?) indicate a '71, at least to me. I look to be corrected, perhaps.
Otherwise, Rossano, lead on!!
|
__________________
Taiga "Tiger" Inoue
1991 Spider Veloce/1967 Sprint GTV (in Japan  )/1970 300SEL 6.3 (in Japan too  )
My mother owns 25 alfas
Last edited by tiger0529; 03-25-2007 at 08:14 PM.
|

03-25-2007, 10:51 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 4,453
|
|
|
I'm lovin this thread. Can't wait to see whats next.
|

03-25-2007, 11:24 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyo.
Posts: 222
|
|
|
You are correct, Taiga. I pulled some of my Alfa books after I posted and they are the smaller tailights; smooth-nose, too. I remembered my '67 GTV's being smaller than the ones in the photos, but...not.
__________________
Mark
'67 Super
'89 Spider Quad
'67 GTV (years ago)
'50 XK120 (years ago)
|

03-26-2007, 08:41 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oakville
Posts: 768
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smestas
I'm lovin this thread. Can't wait to see whats next.
|
Simon, I do have more pics of work done so far to share ..but I'm out of town for the next couple of weeks so I won't be able to post anything till then.
Last edited by 1750GT; 03-29-2007 at 06:44 AM.
|

04-09-2007, 06:22 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oakville
Posts: 768
|
|
Guys, I just returned from the Northwest and spent some time at AKITAMAN's new shop...thanks again Daron for taking the time out of your schedule to play host...it was an informative and inspiring visit! It also reminded me that I have a project that I must get back onto again......so here are a few more updates of the work progress done so far.
As I mentioned previously, the radiator panel or diaphragm was rather poorly repaired at some point and dire need of correction. Although not visible when the engine and other systems were installed...it was definitely visible after the teardown....driver side inner skirt needed attention...no proper battery shelf...
..and the paasenger side bumper bracket is not quite straight....
..check out the angle of this bolt compared to the opposite side bolt....

|

04-09-2007, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oakville
Posts: 768
|
|
Now the perfect scenario would have been to find an original replacement diaphragm panel, as shown in the parts manual and is an assembly made up of at least a dozen pieces.

...but alas I could not find any supplier in Europe who had one of these kicking around. I did manage to come across a complete brand new original GTV front end form Italia-Classic out of France (some of you may recall my post from that e-bay auction I came across last year...which by the way did not sell )..probably for fear of the exhorbitant shipping costs. But I digress.....so my only other option was to look for a used front clip section. Ken Lee gave me a lead on a GTV being parted-out locally so I brought along my trusty 4.5 inch angle grinder and a dozen or cut-off wheels. Unfortunately for me, the complete assembly I was hoping to come away with was not in great condition and so I ended up cutting out only the side sections. On the left is "new' piece and on the right my original. As you can see, these have corrosion on the lower edges (further repair of these would be required).
...the opposite side was not much better..but at least it was useable and in better shape than my original.
Attachment 63213
..to be continued.....
Last edited by 1750GT; 04-09-2007 at 07:18 PM.
|

04-28-2007, 08:07 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oakville
Posts: 768
|
|
|
|

04-28-2007, 08:28 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oakville
Posts: 768
|
|
|
|

04-28-2007, 08:52 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oakville
Posts: 768
|
|
|
|

04-28-2007, 09:08 PM
|
|
< | | |