
10-15-2010, 06:55 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mid Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 68
|
|
|
Poor idling and crankcase breather
Had trouble getting the car to idle right. It would idle OK for maybe thirty seconds then die away. When this happened it appeared to be missing on one cylinder but I could not easily tell which one.
Had a look at the crankcase breather which is a tube that comes out of the front right of the cam cover and puts crankcase fumes into the air cleaner. It also has another breather tube about 4 mm ID which branches off from the main outlet. This puts fumes into the inlet manifold between the front carb and the block. This tube is obviously subject to full manifold vacuum. Have recently done up the motor and its running good with little blowby to the crankcase.
If I blocked off the main breather to the air cleaner at idle the effect of the small breather was that as it sucked any fumes out of the sump it gradually built up a partial vacuum. When this vacuum built up it was no longer bleeding air into the manifold and the motor started idling better and no longer misfired.
It looks like, at idle, this small breather is taking air out of the air cleaner and allowing it to bypass the carb and inserting it into the manifold causing the first cylinder to run lean and misfire. Only bleeds a small amount of air but, at idle, the motor is not using much air and is running at max vacuum so it is enough to make a difference.
Looks like the answer is a one way valve in them main breather line so that fumes can leave the crankcase and travel to the air cleaner but not reverse flow at idle.
Anyone else have this problem? Also, can anyone recommend a valve?
__________________
1974 GTV 2000, Other car is 2004 166 3.0 auto
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
| |
|

10-15-2010, 07:24 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mid Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 68
|
|
|
Sometimes we are blinded to the obvious.
Why don't I just close off the small breather pipe.
Anyone see any problem with that?
__________________
1974 GTV 2000, Other car is 2004 166 3.0 auto
|

10-16-2010, 04:06 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 204
|
|
|
did you check if both breather/fumes rubbers are clear from the inside?
|

10-16-2010, 04:16 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mid Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 68
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfanos
did you check if both breather/fumes rubbers are clear from the inside?
|
Both breather hoses are clear of blockages. Pray tell me what was the thinking behind your question?
__________________
1974 GTV 2000, Other car is 2004 166 3.0 auto
|

10-18-2010, 10:21 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 954
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwi 74 Alfa
Sometimes we are blinded to the obvious.
Why don't I just close off the small breather pipe.
Anyone see any problem with that?
|
My 2.0L Spider has been converted to Webers and a Euro-manifold. On mine I blocked the port on the intake manifold - I thought it was meant as a vacuum source for the later carb'ed cars with Bosch vacuum advance distributors. The small pipe on the breather I have connected to the fuel tank vent system, as was done on US SPICA models. My large breather hose is of course plumbed into the air cleaner assembly. No problems with idle or crankcase over pressure either.
Looking at the parts catalogues for European versions they all show a simple port on the manifold on the intake runner for Cyl.#1, and a hose connected to the smaller stub on the breather, and no check valve of any sort. There is supposed to be flame trap in the larger breather pipe, which would create some restriction. Having seen the way the factory set-up is supposed to be, I am now concerned about how mine is plumbed in. Perhaps some owners of Euro-spec carb'ed cars will share their set-up?
__________________
Andy
81 Spider - 1980 VIN
|

10-18-2010, 01:23 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cardiff/Bristol UK
Posts: 1,460
|
|
|
In theory the throttle butterflies on the carbs should be completely closed when the engine is idling. This means that at idle there is no way for the crank case pressure to vent into the cylinders to get burnt off. The fumes and pressure will go into the airbox but won't be able to get past the butterflies so have nowhere to go.
This is what the small pipe is for. At idle, the pressure goes through this into the manifold at cylinder no. 1. As it vents in behind the throttle butterfly it goes straight into the cylinder and is burnt off there. At idle there shouldn't be much in the way of crankcase pressure or oil fumes (unless the piston rings have had it) so only a small pipe is required.
As soon as you open the throttle, the vacuum moves to the airbox so the larger breather comes into play.
You need to run both pipes, they both need to be clear of obstructions. If you run an oil catch tank, you can ditch the small breather but DO block off the pipe on the inlet manifold or it will be impossible to get a decent four cylinder idle.
Some cars DO have a vacuum take off for distributor advance but this is on the carburettor not the manifold.
__________________
Jim.Spackman@alfaholics.com
Not fast, just furious.
|

10-18-2010, 02:29 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 954
|
|
|
At idle there is still some air being drawn through the carbs (obviously, or the engine wouldn't run) via the float chambers and the vent openings on the DCOE and similar carbs. It seems to me that there would need to be a restriction in the large breather pipe to prevent the line from the manifold being essentially open to the atmosphere, which would certainly upset any idle settings. On cars equipped with a PCV valve, this valve is spring loaded to allow only a small, calibrated amount of flow. Perhaps this is the function of the flame trap inside of the large breather tube.
At any rate the port on cyl.#1 on my car is blocked, and it idles nicely.
__________________
Andy
81 Spider - 1980 VIN
|

10-18-2010, 03:19 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mid Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 68
|
|
|
Mound Dog said "In theory the throttle butterflies on the carbs should be completely closed when the engine is idling. This means that at idle there is no way for the crank case pressure to vent into the cylinders to get burnt off. The fumes and pressure will go into the airbox but won't be able to get past the butterflies so have nowhere to go."
That can't be right. The motor still uses air when idling. Either that or it isn't running. If breather fumes go into the airbox when the motor is idling they will get drawn into the carbs and into the engine. So, with the small air pipe stopped fumes will still burnt rather than go no where.
__________________
1974 GTV 2000, Other car is 2004 166 3.0 auto
|

10-19-2010, 08:51 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 39
|
|
|
I recently found this small tube (blocked off with a common machine screw from the PO) on my '74 GTV w/SPICA, and wondered what it was for.
Where does it connect - is there supposed to be a "t" between the main breather pipe from the valve cover to the oil recovery unit?
thanks-
Chris
|

10-19-2010, 09:04 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 954
|
|
|
This is the PCV system on the SPICA equiped cars, below. The small tube on the breather fitting is connected to the fuel vapor recovery system on the Federalised cars. Note how the vacuum source for the Oil Vapor Separator is taken from the Idle Equalizer fitting.
I have read a number of other posts on the subject last night, and Mound Dawg's description of the small line being attached to the port on the carb Euro-intake manifold at Cyl. #1 appears to be the correct location. If I can find a suitable flame trap to insert in the large breather hose at the airbox I may try it.
__________________
Andy
81 Spider - 1980 VIN
|

10-19-2010, 12:53 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 39
|
|
|
Wouldn't the small tube leading to the intake manifold at #1 cylinder effectively do the same thing as the return to the idel air adjuster (#18)?
|

10-19-2010, 02:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 954
|
|
|
Yes, but the difference is that the vacuum "leak" is evenly distributed over all four cylinders, and not just one. The idle adjustment on the SPICA was a calibrated leak that had some degree of adjustable control. A line to a single cylinder shouldn't work, but as it was used by the factory is must have done.The question is how?
Another thought: When I adjust the carbs the airbox is off and the breather open to the atmosphere. In this case I think that the small line would have to be plugged during tuning.
__________________
Andy
81 Spider - 1980 VIN
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|