#16 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:26 PM
Member
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 78
I'm curious about the make of the gearbox, Wolfgang. It really appears elegant. What is the torque capacity?

Thanks in advance,
Paul
__________________
Gone but not forgotten: 70 Euro GTV, 76 Alfetta, 82 GTV6 Balocco, Step front GTV race car. Current: 105.44 GTV race car to be, 2.0 GTV for future restoration
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 09:19 PM
genericwood's Avatar
Senior Member
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,812
I would also like to know more information about the box. Do tell!

As for "period-correct" historic racing, there will always be a legitimate debate about where to draw the line. If we really wanted to stick to the period, we would outlaw synthetic lubricants, modern brake pad and tire compounds, non-points-type distributors, and ultra-high octane fuels. I'm not suggesting that I believe a 6-speed sequential box in within the spirit of vintage racing, just suggesting that like most things, there is plenty of room for debate.

Erik
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:29 PM
alfatreter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: munich, germany
Posts: 28
hello guys,

first of all, i know that there will be at least to groups. some persons who do not accept such things in vintage cars and the others who maybe find it "cool" etc.

my car is not a "period correct" race car like a gta etc. itīs only a 1300 equipped with many fast and many modern parts like twin spark engine, modern seats, brake, suspension, carbon body parts, injection etc. etc. and maybe soon with a sequential gearbox. and why?? because its a horny feeling to drive such a fast old car on street or racetrack, hear the sound, feel the speed. and its very nice to battle with gt3, m3īs, corvettes, nissans and, and, ... on open trackdays. otherwise there are a few race series in germany or austria, where such modified cars are allowed. ( scuderia alfa corse, histo-cup etc.) there you battle with other modified alfas or with modified bmw 2002 with the old 2,5l m3 engine, opel kadetts, ford escorts, porsche 911/924 and so on
next season i will inscribe me in this two series.

now som technical details: this is a "dog ring box" (this means no synchro rings) the construction is lika a motorcycle gearbox. the maximum torque is 300-350 newton/meter. the input shaft is built with the same diameter like the alfa shaft, so i donīt have to change the clutch, when changing gearbox. only an other driveshaft and i can switch from normal to sequential gearbox, if it is needed.

the gear transmission ratio is with a bit longer first gear than standard, and a 0,85 6. gear almost like standard, so the gears 2, 3, 4, 5 are rather short.

the blue cable is for the reverse gear, which you shift with the second lever on the gear stick.

the bellhousing is a standard alfa part which is black eloxated. it is fixed on a milled adapter plate.


wolfgang
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 12:27 AM
PSk PSk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 4,073
Send a message via AIM to PSk Send a message via Yahoo to PSk
Quote:
Originally Posted by genericwood View Post
IAs for "period-correct" historic racing, there will always be a legitimate debate about where to draw the line. If we really wanted to stick to the period, we would outlaw synthetic lubricants, modern brake pad and tire compounds, non-points-type distributors, and ultra-high octane fuels.
And why not outlaw them (other than maybe the synthetic lubricants as it helps the old engines survive), seriously.

The reason I'm so against the non-period modifications is it ruins the car, deters others from joining in and is the complete opposite of what historic racing should be about, ie: the car ONLY, not the driver.

If the driver has too big an ego for historic racing and letting the car be the star ... I say FNCK OFF and go race modern stuff and let yourself be the next Michael Schumacher.

Anybody that historic races and thinks the crowd comes to see THEM race or win needs a wake up call. We come to see the beautiful old cars as they WERE be exercised hard and safely. Could not care less if they were slow, etc. compared to modern stuff.
Pete
__________________
ps: Remember it's all just opinions
'71 1750 Series 2 GTV: http://www.alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?p=208078
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:21 AM
scole's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSk View Post
And why not outlaw them (other than maybe the synthetic lubricants as it helps the old engines survive), seriously.

The reason I'm so against the non-period modifications is it ruins the car, deters others from joining in and is the complete opposite of what historic racing should be about, ie: the car ONLY, not the driver
Well I can give you one reason for not outlawing brake pads...safety. We forget how dangerous racing was back in the day and how many people died while racing. I am all for making historic racing correct but even better rods in an engine prevents catastrophic failure which can lead to fires. Our club outlaws dog boxes, carbon fiber...... and I completely agree with this. It's a delicate balancing act but well worth it.
__________________
Steve
68 GTAm Tribute, 71 Fiat 124 Coupe 4th Owner, 02 Porsche 911C2
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 08:24 AM
Alex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London UK
Posts: 2,783
Wolfgang,

Very interesting indeed. I particularly like the fact that you say the sequential gearbox can be exchanged for a standard gearbox with just a change of propshaft.

Now for the real question .... who makes this gearbox and what is the model number?

Alex.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 08:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,245
That's the real question Alex...... I get the feeling that you have its inclusion at the back of your mind!!!!
__________________
Stuart

'56 Giulietta Spider, '57 Giulietta Spider Veloce, '57 Giulietta Lightweight Sprint Veloce, '60 SZ, '68 GTA, '76 2000 Spider
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 09:48 AM
Alex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London UK
Posts: 2,783
I wouldn't bugger about with my car like that, but it might make for an interesting addition to a no-nonsense twin spark replica. Oddly enough, this morning someone actually offered me a 1300 GT Junior and a garage full of used spares for pocket money. Hmm.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,245
I wouldn't suggest you muck about with your car its far too nice but, as you say, used in a pocket-money little number, might just keep a smile on your face over the winter! Bet you its not cheap!
How about that lunch we promised ourselves. PM me and we can agree dates.
__________________
Stuart

'56 Giulietta Spider, '57 Giulietta Spider Veloce, '57 Giulietta Lightweight Sprint Veloce, '60 SZ, '68 GTA, '76 2000 Spider
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 12:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6
It Looks exactly like the Gearbox from the Westfield S2000. I've tested one of those, and it used the Elite 6 speed sequential box . . .

Andrew

Welcome to Track & Race Cars Magazine -written by the racers, for the racers
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 04:01 PM
CanAmBob's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 467
Period correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by genericwood View Post
I would also like to know more information about the box. Do tell!

As for "period-correct" historic racing, there will always be a legitimate debate about where to draw the line. If we really wanted to stick to the period, we would outlaw synthetic lubricants, modern brake pad and tire compounds, non-points-type distributors, and ultra-high octane fuels. I'm not suggesting that I believe a 6-speed sequential box in within the spirit of vintage racing, just suggesting that like most things, there is plenty of room for debate.

Erik
Erik I don't see your point regarding the lubricants or brake pads. Having better lubricants that allow the engine to live doesn't take away from the historic race car. What is your point regarding brake pads? Older brake pads did not have the same MOT or bite as modern pads but if the historic car could lock the brakes in the era then the newer pads aren't really changing performance. Now tires are another matter and old tires were the real limitation to better braking and cornering--as Carroll Smith said tires stop the car. I have run DS11 period pads and new pads on a vintage McLaren and yes I prefer newer pads but Denny Hulme and Bruce McLaren set track times with the old pads that have only been recently bested by amateurs running much better tires and way bigger engines. Tires are now restricted in the premier historic races. It pains me to see some of these great old cars massively modified so that a back of the pack driver can move up a few places. In 1996 I put Bill Auberlen in my 1972 ex Hulme McLaren M-20. We were down 100-200hp from some of the other entries. The M-20 had a period correct engine with original headers, etc. and made 750hp. The entire car was original with original suspension etc. Bill won from the pole against an impressive field. I would never modify a car like that.

I agree there is room for debate on period correct mods but lets be serious.
__________________
Bob
1965 RHD GTA Corsa Ex Horst Kwech 1966 Trans-Am and B-Sedan Champion
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 05:20 PM
genericwood's Avatar
Senior Member
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAmBob View Post
I agree there is room for debate on period correct mods but lets be serious.
Bob, I probably failed to make it effectively, but my only point is the same as yours. There is "room for debate on period correct mods." And this is especially true when the race car isn't historically significant. For example, my step-nose race car isn't a GTA, and it wasn't even made into a race car until the late 80's. No history here. My series rules wouldn't allow the 6-speed sequential box, of course. But if they did, and if my competitors are allowed the same, I don't see why anyone else cares? In that case, it is even an entirely reversible procedure. And we aren't talking about original CanAm cars here!

As for brake pads, I disagree with your assessment that modern pad materials aren't changing performance. They most certainly allow better modulation of braking performance, which improves lap times. They also handle high temps better, preventing fade. If they weren't better, no one would use them. The "period correct" argument would be that the cars should be raced as they were "in the day".

Sorry for being an "agitant"!

Erik
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 05:38 PM
PSk PSk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 4,073
Send a message via AIM to PSk Send a message via Yahoo to PSk
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAmBob View Post
It pains me to see some of these great old cars massively modified so that a back of the pack driver can move up a few places.
Exactly the problem ... and why these owners/drivers need to grow some so their ego is not so weak.

It really is pathetic as this is not the place for winning is everything
Pete
__________________
ps: Remember it's all just opinions
'71 1750 Series 2 GTV: http://www.alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?p=208078
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 05:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,245
Pete, Its lovely to see your famous Australian fair mindedness becoming bogged down on this subject. Fair doos if the car is a real GTA.... don't touch it...but if it is a clunker bought for "pocket-money" why not? I don't for one minute think that the intention is to build a stealth GTA or even a stealth step nose....so why can't Wolfgang spend a bit of money and have some fun on the roads.
I do think we have to lighten up on this matter.
__________________
Stuart

'56 Giulietta Spider, '57 Giulietta Spider Veloce, '57 Giulietta Lightweight Sprint Veloce, '60 SZ, '68 GTA, '76 2000 Spider
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:25 PM
CanAmBob's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by genericwood View Post
Bob, I probably failed to make it effectively, but my only point is the same as yours. There is "room for debate on period correct mods." And this is especially true when the race car isn't historically significant. For example, my step-nose race car isn't a GTA, and it wasn't even made into a race car until the late 80's. No history here. My series rules wouldn't allow the 6-speed sequential box, of course. But if they did, and if my competitors are allowed the same, I don't see why anyone else cares? In that case, it is even an entirely reversible procedure. And we aren't talking about original CanAm cars here!

As for brake pads, I disagree with your assessment that modern pad materials aren't changing performance. They most certainly allow better modulation of braking performance, which improves lap times. They also handle high temps better, preventing fade. If they weren't better, no one would use them. The "period correct" argument would be that the cars should be raced as they were "in the day".

Sorry for being an "agitant"!

Erik
Erik you are certainly welcome to your point of view. Turning a stepnose GTV into a hotrod to humiliate Porsche owners is something I can readily understand. I have thought of building a GTV hotrod for the street and the idea appeals to me. I am talking about Vintage/historic racing and holding the line on upgrades much as HMSA, CSRG and Sovern clubs do to stop the creeping stealthy modernization. Historic racing is splitting into two camps the run what you brung clubs and the historic clubs.
As to brake pads yes the newer pads have some better characteristics like higher coef of friction, higher MOT, better release characteristics, and are easier to modulate. All that being said the advantage pales compared to the better tires. I am not sure we could even get old material pads if we wanted them. Scott Gray loves the old Metal Master pads he used twenty years ago on his GTA and will probably still use these pads when he gets his GTA back on track. As the ex GM of brake company I would not run this pad for many reasons. But I bet that Scott will be able to turn in great lap times using these old pads in our typical 20 minute vintage race. Since all competitors can use new pad materials and the use of these pads doesn't alter the look of the car it doesn't diminish historic racing IMHO.

I sincerely apologize for hijacking this thread.
__________________
Bob
1965 RHD GTA Corsa Ex Horst Kwech 1966 Trans-Am and B-Sedan Champion
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



AlfaBB Blog Articles

Advertisement


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright 2002-2008 AlfaBB.com All Rights Reserved.


An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com