
01-10-2008, 08:04 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 524
|
|
|
Good to hear they are all the same too. That at least eliminates more calibration. I'll have enough to do with using my own MAF.
Any easy way to test my old sensor? Certain resistance at room temperature, higher resistance sticking it in the oven, never zero, never infinity? Or never above a certain value?
__________________
Stefano
Concord, CA
iachella [at] gmail [dot] com
|

01-10-2008, 12:03 PM
|
 |
75/Milano manuals for all
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,668
|
|
G'Day Stefano,
See pic.
Eric, just to prove an exception to every rule, I have a sensor here from a Renault (I think) which is 300ohm at 29°C (and it's 5:40am  on it's way to 40°C again   ).
Edit: If you need something to convert °C to °F (and damn near anything to anything) I use convert, it's free.
Last edited by Craig; 01-10-2008 at 01:04 PM.
|

01-21-2008, 03:06 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 170
|
|
|
Pin 1 of AFM to pin 30 of Motronic ECU
Hi
Can anyone tell me the purpose of pin 1 of the air flow meter (0 280 202 202) from a series 4 Spider that connects to pin 30 of the Motronic ECU?
The diagrams from the manual are below.
Regards and thanks.
Simon
__________________
91 Spider, Dover MA
|

01-21-2008, 03:28 PM
|
 |
75/Milano manuals for all
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,668
|
|
|
G'Day Simon,
From (failing) memory it's the CO adjustment pot. It's not used on the TS in closed loop and should be about 2.5V in open loop modes.
Will confirm later if no other replies.
|

01-21-2008, 03:33 PM
|
 |
75/Milano manuals for all
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,668
|
|
|
Ok, I was right. This should answer a few questions.
|

01-21-2008, 04:17 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 170
|
|
|
2.5 volts
Hi Craig
Thanks for the very quick reply. By the look of the circuit diagram, the ~ 2.5 volt signal is constant, no matter whether when the AFM is open or closed - or am I reading the circuit diagram incorrectly? It seems a little strange to go to all that trouble to create a constant 2.5V input.
With regards to switching from an AFM to a MAF such as discussed in this thread, does that mean a 2.5 volt signal should be created to tell the ECU to behave in open loop. Easy to do, but is it necessary?
Thank you very much for the advice.
Simon
__________________
91 Spider, Dover MA
|

01-21-2008, 04:31 PM
|
 |
75/Milano manuals for all
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,668
|
|
Simon,
It's an emissions adjustment (brass screw under cap on AFM), CO at idle I think, measured at tailpipe.
2.5V is an approximation which probably should be simulated when replacing the AFM (but only Bosch really knows  ).
|

01-21-2008, 04:36 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 170
|
|
|
Hmmmmm ...
... begs the question, what happens if you fiddle with it !!! 
__________________
91 Spider, Dover MA
|

01-21-2008, 04:40 PM
|
 |
75/Milano manuals for all
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,668
|
|
The CO emissions at idle change  not much else.
|

01-21-2008, 04:47 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 170
|
|
|
"On catalyst equipped models ... "
Found this ...
CO pot
The CO pot mixture adjuster is a potentiometer that allows small changes to be made to the idle CO. A 5.0 volt reference voltage is applied to the sensor and connected to the AFS earth return circuit. The third wire is the CO pot signal. As the CO pot adjustment screw is turned the change in resistance returns a voltage signal to the ECU that will result in a change in CO. The CO pot adjustment only affects idle CO. Datum position is usually 2.50 volts. On catalyst equipped models, the CO pot has no effect and the CO is thus non-adjustable.
... at this site. www.opel-scan.ru/files/Opel_MotronicML4.1.pdf
__________________
91 Spider, Dover MA
|

01-21-2008, 04:56 PM
|
 |
75/Milano manuals for all
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,668
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razzo rosso
is thus non-adjustable. 
|
Closed loop mode. JimK posted some info somewhere on the BB.
I have the same document at home only for Peugeot and Citroen ML4.1
|

03-15-2008, 01:11 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 876
|
|
|
Super belated reply
Since this thread seems to have died off, I take it noone has had much success. If you're going to go the Split Second route - which I believe to be one of the most cost effective and simplest route for GTV6/Milano owners, I would suggest you go with their MAF kit and the PSC-009 (which should address the fuel pump relay and intake air temp sensor issues with replacing the stock AFM).
Best regards,
|

03-16-2008, 09:39 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 524
|
|
|
From the wiring table, the only difference I see from the 004 to 009 is the fuel pump wire and the 8V reference wire for the higher signal AFMs. The air temp wire exists on both units. I don't see an advantage if your AFM is a 5V one, which the Motronic ones are. Motronic ECU has it's own fuel pump wiring too. Can you explain why you think the 009 is better than the 004?
I'm still planning on getting one soon. I am running an open loop system so I think I should get an O2 sensor welded in before I get one, so I can adjust. I haven't done that yet. I'm going to get some exhaust work done soon anyway since my cat seems to be disintegrating as a result of running open loop for about a year now. At first power seemed down, now power is good but there is a rattling from inside the cat. I'll run the O2 sensor to a guage I have so I'll have them make the new cat removable and make up a straight pipe for now.
So after all that work is done, I'll get the conversion unit. I have acquired a Ford MAF from the correct engine model, so I'm set there. I'll post results, of course.
__________________
Stefano
Concord, CA
iachella [at] gmail [dot] com
|

03-16-2008, 01:23 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 876
|
|
Quote:
Today 09:39 AM iachella wrote:
Can you explain why you think the 009 is better than the 004?
|
When i wrote to them last year and indicated the issue with the air temp and fuel pump relay switch in the AFM (that would need to be addressed in the conversion) they recommended the 009.
I have yet to see any Bosch schematic in my Alfa shop manual or on the net that references the voltage coming off the AFM flapper. Only on the BMW sites did I see something that showed 0 to +7.45v for Bosch L-Jet AFM equipped cars. Doesn't really matter as the PSC can offset the voltage one way or the other.
The main thing is to have the hookup for the two aforementioned (and most forgotten) items in the stock AFM. That's why you'll see guys with early Megasquirt that still have their AFM installed with flapper locked in full open (or fuel pump doesn't get energized & car won't start).
|

04-28-2008, 06:08 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30
|
|
|
Hi,
Still none positive experience ?
About AFM switches: L-Jet and Motronic AFM are very different. They don't use the same voltage (12v and 5v), they have different transfer functions and Motronic does not need the external security pump switch, it's integrated inside the ECU.
| |