|
I was expecting a dramatic change, and I got it. Wow ! As soon as I installed them, and reset the idle (now at about 2 1/4 turns out on the screws instead of 3/4 turn) , it just settled down to a comfortable and easy 850 rpm idle. Taking alfaparticle's suggestion, I revisited the linkage and found that the accelerator cable had been secured at a point that it was causing the butterflies to hang up a few degrees, intermittently. This really played hell with trying to set the idle initially because I didn't find the hangup right away.
I've got 5 miles of brand new straight flat asphalt right by the house. From get go to 6500 rpm, not one hiccup, surge, or flat spot. I was expecting to lose a bit of power, but the engine now feels so lively, I'm not sure if I actually lost any. I didn't see one hint of black smoke, and the plugs appear to be right on the money now. I'll look at them now every 100 miles or so.
Comparing the .050 idlers to the .040, I'm thinking it looks as though they were drilled out(or possibly reamed with a welding tip cleaner: old jetting trick) because the visual light coming through the hole was greatly larger than the new jets.
Similarly, the new emulsion tube not only was a much smaller interior bore, but it has air emulsion holes staggered up the tube in addition to the radial drilling. The old F-16 was radially drilled on one elevation only. The new tube is obviously designed and crafted better.
The supplier inadvertently shipped 150 main jets instead of 150 air corrector jets. They'll send the correct ones free of charge.
But how nice to have a smooth engine hum at 2500-3000 rpm, at 10% throttle, idling down the road, without any crackling, popping, hunting,or sooty exhaust.
So thanks for the comments guys.
One other thing that has been on my mind is the apparent love for the sound and wrap of the 1300 engine. My redline begins at 5800 and extends through 8,000. I have no intentions of running it to 8 grand. I recall that the peak HP is around 6,000. But right at 6,000 the engine opens up and it sounds like it is good for at least another 1000 rpm. So you guys who wax nostalgic over the whine of the 1300, please chime in and tell me about where to drive this engine for performance. I've been shifitng around 6-6500. (wussy)
__________________
Tim
'67 GSGTV-Q (1975)
'69 GT 1300 Junior (current)
'66 Mustang Coupe (current)
Last edited by tek; 06-19-2008 at 02:11 PM.
|