#16 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 04:18 AM
lenus's Avatar
lenus lenus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 401
the 4x4 has no rear dif, and it is a standard 50/50 arrangement. it will just always spin both back wheels at whatever speed the gearbox is turning.

I guess if you take into account the front dif, if all the wheels were spinning more like 66% of the drive would goto the rear wheels between them.

The p4 equipment is out of a fiat panda.

It's already being pushed pretty hard in a p4...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 11:13 PM
Serpent33 Serpent33 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 129
The gears inside a late 146 models are finer. Which means thay are quieter and filmsier. The early ones have lesser teeth. Having performance clutch can be more punishing to the gearbox than higher hp.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2008, 12:40 PM
active active is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Hm.. but mine has the rear diff. Maybe it's from p4, but the gearbox is defenetly from 4x4. it has manual switching 2wd 4wd. Do all p4 had rear disk brakes? Or maybe some of them still had rear drums?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2008, 02:03 PM
77SudTi's Avatar
77SudTi 77SudTi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 642
sounds like you have a box from an earlier car 4x4 system like the montecarlo wagon or similar where there was no centre diff / viscous coupling. Pretty sure all p4's got rear discs and some 2wd's if you opted for ABS in the later models, yet to see one of them!
__________________
- '77 Sud Ti - Project car - C pillar "Ti" stickers needed!!
- '88 series II 33 1.7 Weber'd - More mint than yours!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 07:40 AM
active active is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
I defenetly have rear diff.I saw it ! And about center diff.. is it in gearbox ? 50/50 front rear? or left wheel right wheel?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 01:29 PM
damonb damonb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 66
If you have lever to switch from 2wd to 4wd then you have old style setup from series 1 wagon, etc. There is a rear 'diff' but it's locked, so 4wd can only be used on loose surfaces or snow. The P4 system is permanent 4wd - you can't switch it off, and it has a viscous coupling to rear.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 03:55 PM
lenus's Avatar
lenus lenus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 401
You actually can switch it off, but it's not really meant to be.

There is a relay in the engine bay that you can take out and it dis engages the electromagnetic coupling. It's apparently there for EU markets where the cars have ABS and it disengages the AWD under braking. It still does it in Aus delivered cars.

Some people hook up switches to this couping so they can turn the awd on and off, personally I don't see the point, but you can do it.


lenus.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 05:31 PM
PSk PSk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 3,468
Send a message via AIM to PSk Send a message via Yahoo to PSk
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenus View Post
Some people hook up switches to this couping so they can turn the awd on and off, personally I don't see the point, but you can do it.
May save a little petrol having it off ... maybe not as you are still carrying the unnecessary weight of 4WD and things are still turning that are not required.

Great for cornering (I'm refering to Audi's and Subaru cars, etc.) maybe but 4WD in any form is just inefficient and now with petrol so expensive ... I wonder when this will start hurting Audi/Subaru sales?. The SUV 4WD market will take longer to be affected as owners of such vehicles appear to be thick ... except for the 1% who actually need the 4WD truck.
Pete
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 05:40 PM
77SudTi's Avatar
77SudTi 77SudTi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 642
A true 4WD system will have 3 differentials, of which neither the 4x4 wagon or the P4 have. The P4 uses a viscous coupling in place of the centre differential. The earlier switchable 4x4 system was only designed for loose or wet surfaces where wheels could 'slip' easily accommodating the lack of a centre diff, and negotiating sharp turns with 4x4 engages was not the idea. Due to the earlier 4x4 system not having a centre diff, transmission wind will occur and sooner or later something will give.

The P4 set-up is by far the better system, although still less than ideal.
__________________
- '77 Sud Ti - Project car - C pillar "Ti" stickers needed!!
- '88 series II 33 1.7 Weber'd - More mint than yours!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 06:05 PM
Spooty22 Spooty22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 214
Was just reading that the 4wd system for the p4 was indeed the same as the Fiat Panda, and was designed by an Austrian company called

Steyr Daimler Puch

They also made the 4wd systems for Mercedes G-Wagens and VW Transporter Syncros. Maybe some parts commonality?

Oh they also specialise in building Mil-spec 6x6's
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 06:21 PM
Spooty22 Spooty22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 214
I have an old Modern Motor article testing the series 1 33 4wd. Around Oran park (yep bitumen!) it was 0.3 seconds faster per lap, on average, than in
2wd mode. Pretty surprising, actually.

Also, apparently a series 1 33 4wd won in class at the 1986 Monte Carlo rally

Has anyone seen a 'Monte Carlo' wagon? Apparently an Aus market special edition. The suspension sounds interesting, it was developed specifically for the Australian market. Or so modern motor says:

" ...and the sports suspension developed for, and in, Australia really does work wonders.

The car sits flat and firm on its 30 mm lowered springs while the revised geometry, new front anti-roll bar and the standard Koni shock absorbers ..."

So there you have it! I want to take one apart to see what this "new anti-roll bar" and "revised geometry" is all about.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



AlfaBB Blog Articles

Advertisement


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright 2002-2008 AlfaBB.com All Rights Reserved.


An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com