 |

01-04-2008, 07:59 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 45
|
|
2nd 8v build: The search for torque
Hello Alfisti
Recently built a 1.7 twin carb engine. There were 2 mods;
Higher Compression pistons (11:1)
Colombo Bariani ***.112.280S cams with 280 degree and 11.2 lift
I am starting to wish I kept the original cams because that instantaneous torque (from 800 rpm) is now a thing of the past. In fact torque is very poor below 4000 rpm. I have lost the original beauty of the twin carb 1.7 8v engine with its immediate torque and it is now more like a 16v.
I've decided to rethink and rework my heads:
Go back to the original cams
Have the heads gas flowed and ported
Change to 44 idf carbs
Maybe use AH Motorsports big valve race pack
Does any one have experience with this? Will any of the mods i'm thinking of above reduce low end torque just like the cams? It's a street car and hp above 4000 rpm is annoying to use. I want the power from 1000 rpm.
__________________
Alfa 33 1991 16v (running 8v carb engine)
|

01-04-2008, 09:55 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 129
|
|
|
I use the above cams and have no problem. Not much torque is lost. Pls chk cam timing. These cams should come marked if for the mechanical tappets. High comp pistons are for ppl that really know what they are doing. Replace stock 8v piston first. You may not have sufficient ignition advance due to your high comp. Resulting in super sluggish engine. I don't think your high end is very impressive either. How's the temperature?
|

01-04-2008, 11:50 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 45
|
|
|
Engine is definitely timed up perfectly. The block and the head were cc'd and the compression ratio is definitely no more than 11:1. Vacuum advance is working fine.
Despite these things the car hasn't been to the rolling road yet so that should make a big difference.
__________________
Alfa 33 1991 16v (running 8v carb engine)
|

01-04-2008, 04:27 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 214
|
|
|
If low end torque is all you are chasing, heavily ported heads, 44idfs and big valves are not the way to achieve it! These mods will shift the peak torque further and further up the rev range.
To improve torque, either - increase comp. ratio
- increase displacement
- supercharge or turbocharge
- Port heads for maximum air velocity.
(as opposed to porting for maximum flow)
- try and stay away from hot cams
|

01-04-2008, 05:18 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SF Gay Area
Posts: 1,607
|
|
|
Have you talked to Adie Hawkins about your predicament. Seems like he is a real pro with the boxer (their 2.0L 16V 33 ....260 bhp??).
Maybe it's not the cam lift, but rather the lobe characteristics (sorry, don't know much about boxers). How about the exhaust manifolds and air intake routing? Possibly at this stage you should make sure the mixture is correct, and ignition advance is suited for your engine, not for a stock engine.
I picked up 8 rwhp while tuning my 75 on the dyno. That came from just with 1.5 degrees of advance added (12V, 10.5:1 pistons, CB cams, programmable efi).
Have you checked out Guy Croft's services? Seems like a really good head specialist.
__________________
1987 75 1.6ie
Mods so far: 185/65/14 Nankang HR Tires
|

01-05-2008, 02:47 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 129
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by London_Alfa
Engine is definitely timed up perfectly. The block and the head were cc'd and the compression ratio is definitely no more than 11:1. Vacuum advance is working fine.
Despite these things the car hasn't been to the rolling road yet so that should make a big difference.
|
I run these 280 dur cams and used standard comp. Running 97 rom petrol. I tried 95 ron and detonation is observed when engine temp is higher than usual, from this I am guessing high comp is not a very good idea. There's some theory bout 8v and non high com friendliness. The car idles very smoothly. No torque lost is observed. My low end is very smooth. I hope you can get it sorted out without too high cost incurred. Good luck.
|

01-05-2008, 12:56 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 45
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serpent33
I run these 280 dur cams and used standard comp. Running 97 rom petrol. I tried 95 ron and detonation is observed when engine temp is higher than usual, from this I am guessing high comp is not a very good idea. There's some theory bout 8v and non high com friendliness. The car idles very smoothly. No torque lost is observed. My low end is very smooth. I hope you can get it sorted out without too high cost incurred. Good luck.
|
I have noticed detonation at high temperatures at low rpm, even with 99 Shell optimax. At low temperatures there appears to be v.little or no detonation. Retarding the ignition timing minimised it. I'm considering discarding my K & N bolt on filters in favour of the original airbox to reduce the air intake temperature which might help with the detonation.
I'm thinking that after it's been on the rolling road, had bigger jets etc the detonation and the torque should be sorted.
Serpent 33 are you from the UK? Have you ever tried Tesco's 99 ron fuel?
__________________
Alfa 33 1991 16v (running 8v carb engine)
|

01-05-2008, 01:26 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 45
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 75evo
Have you talked to Adie Hawkins about your predicament. Seems like he is a real pro with the boxer (their 2.0L 16V 33 ....260 bhp??).
Maybe it's not the cam lift, but rather the lobe characteristics (sorry, don't know much about boxers). How about the exhaust manifolds and air intake routing? Possibly at this stage you should make sure the mixture is correct, and ignition advance is suited for your engine, not for a stock engine.
I picked up 8 rwhp while tuning my 75 on the dyno. That came from just with 1.5 degrees of advance added (12V, 10.5:1 pistons, CB cams, programmable efi).
Have you checked out Guy Croft's services? Seems like a really good head specialist.
|
I will give Aidie a call at some stage, just he get so many calls that i don't like to call him unless I really need to. Saying that he's a really helpful bloke.
Sounds like your dyno session was time well spent. The dyno is definitely the next step for me after I cure a noisy shim.
How much rwhp did u get out of your V6?
__________________
Alfa 33 1991 16v (running 8v carb engine)
|

01-26-2008, 06:33 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 21
|
|
|
London Alfa if torque is what you are chasing take those bolt on filters off immediately!
I have a highly modified 1.5 t-carb and have tried a few different induction set-ups.
1. Bolt on filters. = no torque at all b4 4000 rpm. And not a pretty, but loud induction noise.
2. Original airbox = great torque even with highly moded motor, slightly poorer top-end power, and very boring induction noise!
3. The set-up I'm using now is a compromise. I'm using the original air-box but I have cut out almost the whole front section. I admit it will now be sucking in hot air from the back of the rad, but the difference in power is amazing! And the sound is the best I have ever heard from a boxer, combined with my big bore exhaust it now crackles nicely.
The main point though is torque is still far superior to that with bolt on filters, and with an improved sound and top end power.
Have fun experimenting, it is the best way to find what is best for you.
|

01-26-2008, 07:50 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 632
|
|
I think with all the mods you have done you can gain some torque back with a proper induction set-up. Going on what 1981sud was saying about air boxes. Do some research about the Trofeo Sud air horns, they were 90 degree bend tubes and were crazily long, no doubt to give the cars some sort of torque so they could get off the line, 44idfs on 1.3L and 1.5L engines sounds silly, but the obviously worked it out. By changing the length of the intake runners to suit your engine you will be able to improve things vastly.
For my Trofeo induction kit going on my Sud I will be making replica Trofeo style airhorns but tuned to a specific length to suit engine capacity and characteristics, of which Im not sure yet. A fair bit of number crunching and R and D to do...
The bolt on air filters are crap, you need some sort of velocity stack for optimum gain.
Lets us know how you get on.
__________________
- '77 Sud Ti - Project car - C pillar "Ti" stickers needed!!
- '88 series II 33 1.7 Weber'd -off to the body shop
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|