specs?

sh0rtlife · #1 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 12:26 PM

anyone have the factory? or tested specs for
0-60
0-60-0
0-100
1/4 mile
skid pad
gforce
and anything else?

milano or gtv6..anything with a 2.5

its hard enuf to explain a alfa to non owners but even worse when they ask these kind of things and ya dont have the info....to the average muscle car guy ....we just drive lil weenie v6's

bobsiopener · #2 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 12:46 PM

I don't have the info, will be interested to see it, but i don't think you'll be gaining much bragging rights. Most performance cars from the 80's have performance figures that are eclipsed by even the most mundane sedans of today.
My guesses will be in the range of
0-60: high 8 seconds
Skid pad: low .80G

sh0rtlife · #3 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 01:18 PM

ohh i know but it would be nice brain picking info to have.....but when your talking to a crew of guys who's only real info is soly 50's 60s 70's muscle these figures can become quite impresive for a little 6

**sfalfa** · #4 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 03:06 PM

I've got tons of R & T tests from the day, when I get home I'll pull them out and post here.

Ennio · #5 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 03:21 PM

Theres a good test in R/T of a porsche 944,nissan 300zx and gtv6, I will look up in case nothing shows up (I lend the mag no a friend)

TCL · #6 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 03:39 PM

I've seen road tests showing 0-60 times ranging from 8.1 seconds to 8.9 seconds with the quarter mile around 16.1. The Callaway turbo clocked 6.2 to 60.

The GTV-6 is slow compared to my daily driver (a 270hp Nissan), but is still a blast to drive.

sh0rtlife · #7 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 04:16 PM

woot cant wait to see and right click save as the info

i personaly dont mind the hp and what not being down so low being the gtv6 is soooooo much fun to drive...but with the "project" it would be nice to have some baseline figures for later comparison

**sfalfa** · #8 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 05:00 PM

From R & T (not sure of the date, but definitely For early '82 or '83 model year)

1/4 mile: 16.8 sec @ 83 mph
0 - 30 mph = 2.8
0 - 60 mph = 9.1
0 - 80 mph = 15.3
0 - 100 mph = 25.2
Top Speed mph = 125
Fuel economy = 19 mpg
Stopping distance, Ft, from:
60 mph = 162
80 mph = 293
Lateral acceleration, g = 0.778
Speed through 700 ft slalom, mph = 62.0

For the 1985 GTV-6 Calloway Turbo

1/4 mile: 14.5 sec @ 97.5 mph
0 - 30 mph = 2.1
0 - 60 mph = 6.2
0 - 80 mph = 9.7
0 - 100 mph = 15.4
Top Speed mph = 137
Fuel economy = 18.5 mpg
Stopping distance, Ft, from:
60 mph = 157
80 mph = 268
Lateral acceleration, g = 0.81
Speed through 700 ft slalom, mph = 60.1

For the 1985 GTV-6 (stock)

1/4 mile: 16.4 sec @ 85 mph
0 - 30 mph = 2.6
0 - 60 mph = 8.5
0 - 80 mph = 14
0 - 100 mph = 24.3
Top Speed mph = 130
Fuel economy = 25 mpg
Stopping distance, Ft, from:
60 mph = 153
80 mph = 275
Lateral acceleration, g = 0.75
Speed through 700 ft slalom, mph = 58.3

For '88 Milano Verde

1/4 mile: 15.8 sec @ 91 mph
0 - 30 mph = 2.7
0 - 60 mph = 7.5
0 - 80 mph = 12.5
0 - 90 mph = 15.4
Top Speed mph = 136
Fuel economy = 25 mpg
Stopping distance, Ft, from:
60 mph = 149
80 mph = 253
Lateral acceleration, g = 0.79
Speed through 700 ft slalom, mph = 59.8

sh0rtlife · #9 (**permalink**) 11-09-2007, 05:02 PM

WOOT thanx a bunch

fuel mpg is WAY off tho isnt it?.....or was that the MPG durring the testing LOL

would the 83 transaxle have netted a slower 1/4 but a higher top speed? with its gearing?

also i imagine a platinum transaxle would have netted some nicer 1/4 mile times from the LSD