Go Back   Alfa Romeo Bulletin Board & Forums > General Forums > Alfa Romeo History


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #376 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 10:47 AM
dretceterini's Avatar
dretceterini dretceterini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by phila3885 View Post
I confess I may have been looking at a 1900 motor. Can we assume that particularly with regard to these 1900 "Specials" that seem to pop up everywhere, they are guilty (of being fakes, that is) until proven innocent?

Seems a little suspicious that many/most of them turn up on Olczyk's website Buy or sell a classic car : Ferrari, Maserati, Pagani... and look for chassis numbers
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #377 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 11:46 AM
iicarJohn's Avatar
iicarJohn iicarJohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 316
Guilty until proven innocent!

Yes. That is the way of the world in our modern era. Not quite what some "Founding Fathers" might have had in mind? Clearly it is the mindset of far too many, our Commander in Chief being a supreme example ... with just a bit too much power wielded a bit too broadly and with a fair bit of ignorance that is supported only by his belief in some supreme being who surely has to be a bit perverse ... if "he" or "she" or "it" exists! A reminder that it's a good thing we are only discussing cars here!

Run-on sentences aside, there is a huge semantical problem in the concept observed rather sartorially (I hope) by "phila3885". Cars are not "guilty" of anything whatsoever. It is only a person who can willfully mislead or ignorantly communicate (or fail to communicate) something that he or she cannot know without further study. When we place a simplistic label on a car, bias and innuendo become forefront in the minds of many and at least some begin to stop paying attention. At that point, "study" becomes more difficult.

I've already asked for further data and have had a couple of very nice personal messages that would seem to indicate that more information might be forthcoming. Until that information comes to one of us and is shared, I would encourage one and all to stop blowing smoke, muddying the waters, whatever your favorite obfuscation metaphor happens to be.

I might add that it is often that a photo or even a specific item of information that is recorded, such as an engine number for example, is really only a "snapshot" of a moment in time. So, it can be of use to simply verify an engine number as being still in a car. Not all information has to be "new". Sometimes information can be part of a continued collective observation. We are in the investigative stage. We are not ready to call a jury. And it is no murder trial in any case.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #378 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 02:48 PM
Odin's Avatar
Odin Odin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Since 1994 in Chile
Posts: 94
John,
I think your statement is right, but there were so many cars, with a 'doubtfull' history, who came out of Belgium, in the last couple of years and I believe, there is a strong connection with some guys in Argentina.
Maybe we are wrong with our opinion, about Olczyk, maybe he is a nice guy and a good carfinder, but he never liked, to speak about doubts, he insults Us, cause we are not clients of his cars. So obviously, somebody thinks, if there are cars, with an Olczyk connection and no proven history, they must be fakes. I checked it with TZ-1 #004, this car was in 1992 in South Africa, with a Plastic TZ-1 Body, now it is in Belgium, with TZ-2 Body, maybe another Car? You saw the silly discussion about the 'first Ferrari', in the Ferrari Chat? The silly Game about the 'Barnfind' Bizzarrini?
I myself, like these so called Bitzas, some are realy great looking cars and fun to drive, but I don't like to be fooled, with an homemade history.
Regards
Jörg

Last edited by Odin; 12-16-2007 at 02:52 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #379 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 03:17 PM
iicarJohn's Avatar
iicarJohn iicarJohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 316
"Good" or "Bad"

I will not defend Mr. Olczyk as being either "good" or "bad". Like most of of us, he is probably a complex mix. In my own case, I believe he has already shown enough of what he is in the car world but there is perhaps still a chance for some vindication? Currently, my personal preference would be that nobody sell or buy a car of any kind, "good" or "bad" with his involvement as either buyer, seller or middleman. Frankly, I would have thought that public opinion would have already cast him out of the collector car world.

Regardless of who the seller is, any buyer would be wise to show some patience (and perhaps less greed or opportunism?) and take some time to do some real research before taking anyone else's word for a history that cannot be supported. In the case of the cars that have appeared (courtesy of "phila3885") recently on this thread, it is not my impression that anyone has made any overt claims about any of them at this point in time and that means that neither the cars nor the people involved (at a distance anyway) are guilty of anything at all. We are aware that they exist and know roughly where they existed as of perhaps a few days ago. That is all.

Oh, and I loved and identified with the reference made earlier by _________ as to likening the discovery of such a car around the corner as being something akin to "Marilyn" or "Farrah" showing up at the front door clad only in a negligee. Indeed! Even a look-alike might make your heart race just a bit?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #380 (permalink)  
Old 12-17-2007, 09:03 AM
dretceterini's Avatar
dretceterini dretceterini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by iicarJohn View Post
I will not defend Mr. Olczyk as being either "good" or "bad". Like most of of us, he is probably a complex mix. In my own case, I believe he has already shown enough of what he is in the car world but there is perhaps still a chance for some vindication? Currently, my personal preference would be that nobody sell or buy a car of any kind, "good" or "bad" with his involvement as either buyer, seller or middleman. Frankly, I would have thought that public opinion would have already cast him out of the collector car world.

Regardless of who the seller is, any buyer would be wise to show some patience (and perhaps less greed or opportunism?) and take some time to do some real research before taking anyone else's word for a history that cannot be supported. In the case of the cars that have appeared (courtesy of "phila3885") recently on this thread, it is not my impression that anyone has made any overt claims about any of them at this point in time and that means that neither the cars nor the people involved (at a distance anyway) are guilty of anything at all. We are aware that they exist and know roughly where they existed as of perhaps a few days ago. That is all.

Oh, and I loved and identified with the reference made earlier by _________ as to likening the discovery of such a car around the corner as being something akin to "Marilyn" or "Farrah" showing up at the front door clad only in a negligee. Indeed! Even a look-alike might make your heart race just a bit?

My view of Olczyk may be a bit tainted, but he DID sue me, Patrick Italiano, Paul Kaizer (the founder of the Atlas nostalgia forum, now owned by Autosport magazine) and 15 "John Does", including Doug Nye, for doing nothing more than stating our OPINIONS of his TZ book. He has continually tried to broker/sell cars without full disclosure of what is known within the classic car circles about them! It is again just my opinion, but I think this is lying by omission...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #381 (permalink)  
Old 12-17-2007, 09:47 AM
Odin's Avatar
Odin Odin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Since 1994 in Chile
Posts: 94
Hi Stuart,
I think, his goal was to polish up his little knowledge, with the help of others and be a big fish in the 'Old-Carworld'.
Now he is residing in South of France, writing books, based on internet information.
Times are changing, but in a good way??
Regards
Jörg
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #382 (permalink)  
Old 12-17-2007, 10:28 PM
dretceterini's Avatar
dretceterini dretceterini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Hi Stuart,
I think, his goal was to polish up his little knowledge, with the help of others and be a big fish in the 'Old-Carworld'.
Now he is residing in South of France, writing books, based on internet information.
Times are changing, but in a good way??
Regards
Jörg


I don't think Olzyck has any motive other than to lie by omission,and screw as many people as he can selling "recreations" as real cars. The person who bought the car then has to sue to get his money back when he finds out it isn't real. I know of at least one case where this has happened!

Some people are afraid to say anything publically, as Olczyk loves to sue for stating opinions contrary to the BS he puts out.

IMO he is the biggest piece of scum in the classic car business. He makes Bob Cozza look like a Saint!

I have addresses for Olczyk in Belgium and Montreal, Canada, but none in France...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #383 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007, 09:20 AM
phila3885 phila3885 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 99
With regards to my last comment, I hope most people got it that I wasn't blaming the car. I was just curious how many "real" cars (the 1900s Specials) were out there, since most are automatically discredited in these threads. If I missed a comma there, sorry. I didn't realize we were writing novels here. (No need for specific comments- I realize we are off-topic again)
__________________
Phil

Now:
'62 Giulietta Sprint
'95 BMW M3

Then:
'69 Lotus Elan S4 SE
'79 Spider Veloce
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #384 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007, 09:43 AM
iicarJohn's Avatar
iicarJohn iicarJohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 316
blame?

Hi Phil,

No sense of blame of any sort has been implied to me by your postings. I've had no problem enjoying and understanding your postings and I can hope that a missing comma is the least of my literary faults.

All the best.

John de Boer
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #385 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2008, 04:14 AM
Alfaman75's Avatar
Alfaman75 Alfaman75 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 21
teach me!

Last night I spend several hours in reading this very interesting Disco Volante / 6C 3000 thread. But instead of finding some answers, only more questions came up. Some of you guys are such an expert in this matter!

It is a pity that most of the pictures ever posted in this forum are lost. I think a lot of interesting ones appeared in it. I am most curious in the one were all 4 6C 3000 Colli coupes were on a truck. Can somebody please repost that photo. Thanks!

A point that worries me is this statement from John de Boer in post # 348 “I have been informed that I do not have permission to use all the material that has been supplied to tell the story that would like to be told here”.
I don’t believe that this thread is a matter of national security so unless some material is copyright protected (and even then you can refer to the source where we can find it without publishing it!) I can’t see any reason why the true story can’t be told!!!

I’m new in this matter so maybe my remarks are very stupid but anyway, I will give it a try.

Something that until know was not mentioned in this topic (except if I missed it) is that in the Disco Volante book, Anderloni stated on page 17-20: “…The first model of the flying Saucer to see the light was the Type 1900 C52 Flying Saucer 2000, and three of them were built. Immediately afterwards the Flying Saucer was fitted with a 3000 cc engine which called for a chassis with a slightly longer wheelbase and a few bodywork modifications, so light that they were not immediately visible. (Is it possible that you can recognize them by the different dashboard, presence/absence of louvers in the bonnet,...?)

Two of this model, The flying Saucer type 6C3000, were built. In 1953 Gioachino Colombo left Alfa Romeo and the Flying Saucer’s development continued under Rudy Hruska, who was another expert engineer with a yen for innovation. He fell in love with the car immediately and backed for further development of the original idea, given touring Superleggera the job of working on a closed version and a narrower version. The first was the “Flying Saucer 2000 Coupé”, the second the “Flying saucer narrow sided”. To save time and in this case also to limit expenditure, these two new versions were obtained by modifying one of the three Type 2000s already built. As a result Alfa had at its disposal three versions of the same car with which it could carry out head to head tests as well as have the right car for each kind of competition (Speed, Cross country, Hill climbs). …”

Strange thing is that although the ‘Disco Volante’ name is common known in the world, it is all the time translated by ‘Flying Saucer’ and ‘Soucoupe Volante’ in respectively English and French.

But more interesting in his statement that:

a) first 3 1900 C52 spiders were made
b) then 2 6C 3000 spiders were made
c) then two of the 1900 C52 spiders were modified. One in the narrow side spider, the second one in a coupe




d) The work was done by Touring

If I make a summary of what has been told about this issue in the 384 posts before this one I come to this (please correct me if I am wrong on this):

a) In 1952 the normal C 52 Disco Volante was made as well as the narrow sided spider (not as a rebodied ‘normal’ spider) and a 6C 3000 spider
b) In 1953 the 1900 C52 coupe was made (not as a rebodied spider) and another 6C 3000 Spider was made.
c) The narrow side spider was made by Colli, the other ones by Touring.


Can someone clear out these contradictions?



About the Colli built 6C 3000 “Disco Volante’s”:

4 coupés and 2 spiders (the second Spider was the 6C 3000 PR) were built.

The 6C 3000 PR was crashed before it made it’s public appearance (even photos of the don’t exist).

1361.00125 was a Colli coupe and in 1955 after a crash it became the Bonnier Zagato Spider.



1361.00126 was a Colli coupe that became (after a crash?) the Boano Peron Car. Because of a heavy crash in 1984, the Peron car was rebuild again to Colli specification.



1361.00128 was a Colli coupe that became the 4 Pininfarina show cars. What happened to the coachwork of the original colli, and the three previous Pininfarina cars?)






1361.00127 is in the Museo Storica Alfa Romeo. But I am only aware that the Museo has only a spider in it’s collection. But the Spider in the museum looks different than the Spider that is present on old photos. So was the spider rebuild as a spider or was there always the possibility to transform the single seater into a 2-seater (remove cover, add headrest,…?) Or was the car originally the 4th coupe that later was transformed into the spider we currently know (when and why was the transformation made?)








The main question is:

Where are the 1362.00012 Spider and the 6C 3000 C.M. 4th coupe/only spider.
I guess the original ones are not somewhere in Belgium.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #386 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2008, 08:50 AM
dretceterini's Avatar
dretceterini dretceterini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfaman75 View Post
1361.00128 was a Colli coupe that became the 4 Pininfarina show cars. What happened to the coachwork of the original Colli, and the three previous Pininfarina cars?)
I don't think anyone knows the answers to those questions, but I think parts of the 1st PF show car were incorporated into the later versions. As far as I am aware, the rest of the bodies were scrapped...

As to 6c3000 spiders; the 6c3000PR and the 6c3500 Supercoretemaggiore car were different. I'm not sure if one or two Supercortemaggiore cars were made; one with a single headrest and one with two headrests, or if it is the same car, with modifications..


As to the C52s, you say
Quote:
then two of the 1900 C52 spiders were modified. One in the narrow side spider, the second one in a coupe
I don't think the coupe was a modified spider, I think it was an additional car, and it is the same case for the narrow sided spider.

Last edited by dretceterini; 01-02-2008 at 08:58 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #387 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2008, 02:21 PM
AlfaRonny's Avatar
AlfaRonny AlfaRonny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 597
I believe the picture was originally posted by Boudewijn, but here it is.
And two more of the start of the 24 hours
Attached Images
   
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #388 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:14 PM
cominges cominges is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
I have a question regarding the Alfa Romeo 6c 3000 CM spider, I would like to know what the function of each knob which is on the board of the car and what is written on posters indicating the function of each one

I already put a number on every knob or poster

Thank you
Attached Images
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Articles

Advertisement