
07-04-2009, 08:42 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 117
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duk
Me thinks you are expecting waaaaay to much from the Alfa Romeo design team!
They failed in many areas of building these cars (tho I still want mine in 1 piece again  ), and you think they went to some great trouble to have some really well tuned exhaust after such an ordinary pair of manifolds (on the V6s. tho probably heeeaps better than most Aussie/American engines of that era) that relied on some specific cat converter volume and/or diameter?
Please don't mention back pressure and torque in the same sentence. That is a factual misinterpretation of what happens.
If Mr (or Mrs) thread starter wants some sort of dodgy, illegal cat replacement, I'd sujest that they put a piece of pipe that is the same diameter as the rest of the exhaust inside the cat body.
Tho a new, replacement cat is the obvious true sollution.
|
Finally a voice of reason! You confirmed my own suspicions. How could a cat produce more power than a straight pipe? Dedicated racers don't use cats. I get the feeling many people would WANT to do straight pipes, but don't because of legal fears, or emissions testing. Hoping none of the information is coming from thisfactisajoke.com
I am going for the cheapest solution. I honestly don't even care about what produces the most power. My Milano is my secondary car, and I have no intentions of building it up to be anything. It's a cloudy day car.
But I'd love it if the cheapest solution produced the most power. And like I said, I'm already catless on my Spider(thank you previous owner).
__________________
1978 Spider Veloce
1987 Milano Platinum
|