04-27-2009, 07:09 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 76
|
|
 Quote:
Originally Posted by iicarJohn
I made no allusions whatsoever to fabricating history. The history was made. I asked for patience and thorough study ... and for each one of us to avoid assumptions. Apparently, you have accepted that 205-101 made the history that has been claimed for it. I do not. Yet. As I said. Some points need to be cleared up. I am done with a dialogue where I cannot attempt to help give perspective to those who want none.
|
John,
You just yesterday made mention of the fact that rivet holes were found on 101 where the aerodynamic nose section should have attached, we know a car with a nose such as that raced in the MM, we know that another car without the nose section raced in the same year, so it must be 101 and 102, if 101 had rivet holes then 101 had that specific history. Am i missing anything?
i can tell you for certain that 103 did NOT have rivet holes.
rgds
|