OK, Ladies and Gentlemen let's not get mad at USATRADE/ Claude. This is a softball lobbed right our way. "What's so great about the 164?"
What could be an easier question to answer?
Claude's criticisms.
Racing: NO, it does not, and will not, handle like a rear wheel drive car. Therefore, it is not a surprise that it was pulled from "racing."
Poor sales: Yes, ALL Alfas of the period were dogs in the sales dept (especially in the USA) It was not marketed correctly. Also, quirkiness that was perfectly acceptable in more popular marques (e.g. BMW) like console mounted window switches, where considered a minus in the Alfa. Further, while cars like Jaguars were even less reliable than Alfa, they got a "pass" as they were better known in the US market, could better weather the storm, and got taken over by Ford with a big budget to keep them afloat.
Appearance: Here, I have NO idea what Claude is talking about. He doesn't like it? Fine. Others he has spoken to did not? Fine too. But I personally have never met anyone who did not think it was beautiful. The US automotive press virtually unanimously praised the cars appearance (and most all everything else about it).
So, what do I like about my car?
It looks like almost nothing else (but in a good way).
The engine is so sweet and smooth.
It seats 4-5 in comfort.
Has all the toys (ABS, good sound system, WORKING A/C, power everything).
The engine is a work of art just to look at.
Cavernous trunk
That maligned FWD provides great wet and snow traction.
It makes me feel good (can't quantify that too much for you!)