View Single Post
  #279 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2007, 10:23 AM
volpebob2 volpebob2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 9
Drop Spindle Discussion

Richard,

Thanks for your input, but I think we're on the same page on most points. My setup is working very well on my race car, and employs more or less your philosophies, if you review my post on my initial setup for the benefit of Grant and his handling issues.

I've seen some of your posts in the past, and liked most of what I've read. I've no issues with the car except for brake overheating, but on the handling side the car is very neutral w/a slight tendancy towards oversteer in throttle-on fast sweepers, as I set it up that way per the chassis program we used initially, and I have to say, it was good right out of the gate. The setup range was 100 (understeer) to 110 (oversteer), 105 being neutral, and I set it up at 106 percent.

You are correct, the car is heavy, but with a stiff setup such as mine it feels 500 lbs. lighter, and although it is not as lithe in the twisty bits as an Elise or a Honda, it is extemely stable in fast sweepers, where I can make-up time on twichier or shorter wheelbase cars.

According to my setup program, the ideal numbers would include a lower ball joint location 1/2" lower than present, which prompted my search for drop spindles.

I cannot enclose a photo of the car in action as the file is too big, but if you would like to see it (if you think you may be able to gain some insight to the level of success of the setup), send me your E-mail and I'll forward. Always looking for the competitive advantage. Tire temps really tell the story--after a session they are even across the board.

I welcome any suggestions you may have.

Thanks, Bob
Reply With Quote