View Single Post
  #189 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:12 AM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,961
Send a message via AIM to Grant
Just to clarify, I'm in the camp that likes softer spring rates and repaired suspension geometries. I've edited my type-o in the above post

Another thing to ask yourself when reading all of these opinions is, what do you want to do with your car? My "race car" is also my daily driver. I'm rather glad I'm not running the spring rates that RSR has, but can definitely say that out on the track, I wished I had RSR spring rates!

Mats alsways brings up the poing that your alignment goes wonky if you brake hard with softer spring rates, which I think must be true. So even though with the D-spindles my car seems to grip a lot better, I'm sure I'm giving up some braking performance. But I'm tracking my car about .05% of the time I'm driving it, so that compromise is OK.

What are your goals? Can you see why everyone is arguing here?
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. [B][COLOR="Red"][URL="http://alfabb.com/bb/forums/showthread.php?t=42980"]PARTING OUT[/URL][/COLOR][/B]

1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!

1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Reply With Quote