View Single Post
  #264 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 07:41 PM
Broyax's Avatar
Broyax Broyax is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 307
Send a message via MSN to Broyax
Quote:
Originally Posted by sptsdn
So you would rather have no Alfas at all? Without FIAT, there would be no Alfa or Ferrari. Without Ford there would be no Jaguar, Volvo, Aston Martin, or Land Rover; without GM there would be no Saab; no Lamborghini and Bentley without Audi; etc, etc, etc.

Facts need to be faced, Alfa could not survive on its own and needed assistance. Merging/sharing products is a result of this. The parent companies should expect a return on their investments - they're businesses, not charitable organizations.

If all the above mentioned companies were so great to begin with they shouldn't have needed to be bailed out. They were all competing for the same respective customers but failed. Does it seam reasonable for the parent companies to allow them to continue their downward spiral? No, instead, they needed to share development costs in order to survive. The "purest" mentality is no longer valid.
Of course.

Alfa is dead.

And rebadged / rebodied Fiat-GM-Opel production is purely f*cking sh*t : a pathetic caricature.
Reply With Quote