#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 04:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 248
alfa 2600 camshaft timing with weber set up

Hi All,

The standard 2600 inlet cam timing is 20 degrees before TDC and 70 after BDC

All other alfa engines 1300/1600/1750/1800/ 2000 CC with weber ,dellorto and solex double sidedraft carbs have inlet cam timing between 34-41 degrees before TDC and 58-61 after BDC.


Is this for the solex 44PHH and also for weber 45DCOE9 ??

I can't find a different cam timing for the weber 45DCOE9 set up in my alfa 2600 documentation/data sheets .

I think the engine performes better with inlet cam timing between 34-41 degrees before TDC and 58-61 after BDC with the weber 45DCOE9 set up.

Does someone have experience ?

rgds Franco

Last edited by franco-veloce; 08-06-2009 at 05:22 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2009, 05:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 248
Hi all,
I changed today my standard 2600 inlet cam timing
( 20 degrees before TDC and 70 after BDC )

to 30 degrees before TDC and 60 after BDC

with nice results : better response on acceleration between 1500-3000 rpm and above 4000 rpm the 2600 goes like a Ferrari ............

rgds Franco
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2009, 06:23 PM
tubut's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,538
That's great! Thank you for posting the results -- I can't wait getting to the point where I can try this myself.
__________________
Ruedi
'63 2600 Touring Spider (reassembly in progress)
'65 2600 SZ (resto project)
Maintainer of a 2600 SZ register (not the Dutch one).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2009, 03:12 PM
Redmerlin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Amersham . Bucks, UK
Posts: 231
Hi

Can you explain a little more- does this mean yo have moved the inlet cam by 10 degrees? or have you retimed the distributor?

Thanks
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2009, 04:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 248
I moved the inlet cam 10 degr. advanced ( about 3,5 mm )

rgds Franco
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2009, 06:59 PM
tubut's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,538
FYI, to address some off-BB questions: The cams for the 2600 SZ are the same as for Sprint/Spider (106.01.03.200.00). So far, I have not seen any information that would suggest different timing settings.

The only significant difference between 2600 SZ engines and Sprint/Spider engines are the engine mounts (the engine is placed 8 mm lower on 2600 SZ).

BTW: It's a myth that these cars were supplied with Webers as factory standard. Webers were optional the same way they were optional on Sprint/Spider. Most cars seem to have been sold with Solex carbs but quite a few were converted to Webers.
__________________
Ruedi
'63 2600 Touring Spider (reassembly in progress)
'65 2600 SZ (resto project)
Maintainer of a 2600 SZ register (not the Dutch one).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2009, 08:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 83
I'm sure you can run 10.5 or 11 mm lift cams (you would probably have to regrind stock cams) on a 2600 with the proper jetting and timing.

If you really want to go nuts, you can also do a 30 overbore, and use 12:1 compression pistons....and have at least 250 horsepower
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2009, 08:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubut View Post
FYI, to address some off-BB questions: The cams for the 2600 SZ are the same as for Sprint/Spider (106.01.03.200.00). So far, I have not seen any information that would suggest different timing settings.

The only significant difference between 2600 SZ engines and Sprint/Spider engines are the engine mounts (the engine is placed 8 mm lower on 2600 SZ).

BTW: It's a myth that these cars were supplied with Webers as factory standard. Webers were optional the same way they were optional on Sprint/Spider. Most cars seem to have been sold with Solex carbs but quite a few were converted to Webers.
It seems like a fair number of sprints came with Webers (including the 2600 sprint raced by Elio Zagato), but I don't know of a single spider that came from the factory with Webers.

The Webers were also an option on the OSI 2600 berlina...but I don't know of any that had this option! (54 OSI's were made, only 2 are know left, both at the Alfa Blue Team in Italy)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2009, 01:21 PM
Redmerlin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Amersham . Bucks, UK
Posts: 231
2600 Piper cams

For reference I have a set of 2600 cams made by Piper in the UK - they were described to me as 1750 profile cams for use with Webers.

Inlet Open 30 degrees BTDC Close 70 degrees ABDC
Exhaust Open 70 degrees BBDC Close 30 degrees ATDC

as attached

Due to fit at Christmas

nb approx 7 OSI's left - two in Germany

Ian
Attached Images
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 04:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 248
Hi All,

theoritical these "1750 " cams with 1750 webers carbs must give the 2600 about 180 PS ??

1779 cc x 1.5 = 2668cc and 120PS x1.5 = 180 PS

My car with the 10 advanced standard inlet cams and weber 45DCOE 9 goes from 0- 100km/H < 9 secs but I think the "1750" cams gives better result.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2009, 06:25 AM
BWB's Avatar
BWB BWB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fordingbridge, Hants. UK
Posts: 43
Piper cam query

Ian (RedMerlin)
Were the piper cams new or did they grind (reprofile) a spare set. Just wondering as I am way off the point where I need to worry about cams, but its all useful info for the (hopefully not too distant) future!
(apologies to Franco for thread hijack!)
Regards
Bryan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 02:30 PM
Redmerlin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Amersham . Bucks, UK
Posts: 231
Bryan - i don't know the answer to your question - you can try contacting Piper - I guess they have records of 2600 cams they have made
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2009, 06:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 81
Questions for Franco

Hi Franco,

I have read this thread (and other Weber related threads) as I am seriously considering changing out the Solex's on my 2600 spider.

You seem to be having good success with your Weber set up, and I have some questions that I hope you can answer:

It sounds like you have gone with 45DCOE9's. Can you tell us what the sizes of the variable parts are (venturis, main jets, Aux jets, Emulsion tube, Air correction, Idle jet, Slow(start) jet and pump jet (to name a few!))?

Also did you only adjust your inlet cam 10 degrees advanced, or did you also adjust your exhaust as Adrian did (inlet cam advanced one hole, exhaust retarded one hole).

Are you running the original Solex manifold or did you de-siamese it?

Thanks,

John
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 02:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 248
Hi,

I have an original weber inlet,
original standard 45 dcoe 9 with only change of the venturi to a 33mm and I only adjust inlet cam 10 degrees advanced.
but the jet settings must be changed for fine tuning in future...........


RGds Franco
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 11:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 81
2600 into the 21st century (kind of)

Thanks very much Franco,

An original Weber manifold, thats cool!

In my fascinating journey into Alfa arcana, and my attempt to bring my 2600 spider in the 21st century (without scarring it permanently) there are a couple things that many people seem to agree on: 123 ignition, new coil, and a GM alternator. Iridium plugs seem like a good idea too. I hear power, rather than armstrong, steering would be nice, but believe that is a bridge too far...

I also plan to change out the Solex carbs for Webers, and I am trying to get a consensus on the best approach to fit them to a 2600, but am not having much luck!

Many people advocate modifying the Solex manifold, but some have reported good results without any changes. All seem to agree the original Weber manifold/set up is best - however this seems to not be a valid option...

Some like DCOE 40's and some like 45's (I understand both can work).

The procedure for determining carb and venturi size seems a bit of a black art, as when I extrapolate from the graph on page 2 of the "Selection and tuning of Weber DCOE Carburettors" pdf (attached) - I get a venturi size of 40, giving a barrel size of 50! (interestingly I see OK parts offers a 50 DCOE...)

When I look at another graph which uses cylinder capacity (see below) I get a venturi size of 34mm using a per cylinder capacity of 433cc.

Franco tells us he has had good luck with 33mm Venturis on otherwise standard 45DCOE9's (through an original Weber manifold).

Adrian (in other posts) advocates 40's with 33 venturis, or factory standard 45's (36mm venturis) through, I believe, an unmodified Solex manifold.

So what to do?

I guess I'm leaning toward buying three new 45DCOE 152's, and see how they go through my unmodified Solex manifold.

I am also leaning to following Franco's lead and advancing the inlet valve timing 10 degrees

Thoughts from the brain trust?

John







I
Attached Images
 
Attached Images
File Type: pdf Weber DCOE setup.pdf (183.2 KB, 78 views)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



AlfaBB Blog Articles

Advertisement


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright 2002-2008 AlfaBB.com All Rights Reserved.


An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com