Go Back   Alfa Romeo Bulletin Board & Forums > Alfa Romeo Technical Forums > 164 & 168 (1991-1995)


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2004, 01:52 PM
jontg428's Avatar
jontg428 jontg428 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Martinez California
Posts: 1,744
Send a message via Yahoo to jontg428
I am pretty sure they are different

I was looking at rebuilt racks the other day, and the milano rack was a different part number alltogether. The fact that the 164 is a much wider car then a Milano or GT-V6 would mean that it would need a different rack alltogether. A rebuilt rack is about in the $450 range, I have found them as cheap as $300, but would be a little skeptical. A new rack for my car runs $860 or so from centerline, I think I will go with the reman unit! Good luck,

Jon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2004, 02:32 PM
trygve11 trygve11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 270
No f'ing way...
__________________
- Jason Hagen, Kansas City, KS
'95 164Q, '91 164S, '73 Spider
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2004, 10:32 PM
taliesin's Avatar
taliesin taliesin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 25
We need our heads examined The steering rack in my 164 should be mounted on velcro it has been removed so often.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2004, 11:19 PM
jontg428's Avatar
jontg428 jontg428 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Martinez California
Posts: 1,744
Send a message via Yahoo to jontg428
Are the racks really that bad?

I am going to do mine in the summer, and yes I have heard that the racks on the auto cars are a weak point, but for manual cars, do they really give that much trouble? Any help on removing and replacing would be appreciated, have a good christmas everyone!

Jon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2005, 09:24 AM
Trav Trav is offline
Senior Member
Gold Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Washington DC USA
Posts: 221
My rack/pump is leaking a bit too, and my pump howels when its below freezing. I thought I had seen a recomendation for a liquid sealer you add to the fluid somewhere on this BB. My search only lead me here. Does anybody know of this medicated goo for my ailing rack??

Thanks TD
__________________
Trav

1969 1750 Spider
1971 1750 GTV
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2005, 10:28 AM
81gtv6's Avatar
81gtv6 81gtv6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portsmouth, New Hampshire
Posts: 1,719
Send a message via AIM to 81gtv6 Send a message via Yahoo to 81gtv6
I would be willing to try that as a last ditch effort to fix it.

I am pretty sure im going to go with greg gordon's method and turn it into a manual rack. $400 for a new one is really high, not to meantion if they are notoriously leaky this will be a permanent fix. The only thing im worried about is the difficulty turning, being FWD and an overall heavier car. I will be sure to tell you guys how it worked.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2005, 11:22 AM
jontg428's Avatar
jontg428 jontg428 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Martinez California
Posts: 1,744
Send a message via Yahoo to jontg428
you will look like a body builder with a manual rack!

Keep in mind the 164 is nose heavy, my guess is its 60/40 for the weight bias and it weighs in a good 300-400 pounds more then a milano or gtv-6, so I would still, despite the problems, keep a power rack. I have however, never seen an article on a manual rack and would be interested in seeing a person do an installation of one. Good luck!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2005, 12:33 PM
81gtv6's Avatar
81gtv6 81gtv6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portsmouth, New Hampshire
Posts: 1,719
Send a message via AIM to 81gtv6 Send a message via Yahoo to 81gtv6
I look like a body builder already ;)



Well i figure if im gonna spend $400 on a new rack i might as well try this before laying down the cash. I HATED the manual steering of my GTV6 at first, but I hardly noticed after driving it for a week or so. We will see how it goes, tonight im going to dig her out from under a foot of snow.

Does the 164 steering rack come out the same way the GTV6/Milano's does?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2005, 02:30 PM
Mottic Mottic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Loudoun, VA
Posts: 140
Jake -

Try it without P/S - I'll bet you love it at highway speeds and hate it in town - I did. It is significantly more difficult than the GTV6. Just pop off the belt and drive it like that for a while - you'll get the idea.

The key to longevity with these racks (or any rack for that matter) is the boots. Often they crack underneath where it's difficult to see, or folks just miss them. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with their design or quality, rather they just don't take kindly to being unprotected and having crapped kicked up at them and buggering the seals.

Enjoy -
__________________
Ryan

'84 GTV6
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2005, 05:54 PM
Greg Gordon Greg Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,110
I think it will be fine if converted to manual steering. Sure it will be heavier but probably not too bad. My 64 Ford 500 has manual steering and my 13 year old son drives is with no problem. Of course it has a huge steering wheel with about a jillion turns lock to lock.

Trying the power steering with the belt removed will not accuratly represent the steering effort is the rack is converted properly to manual. It will be lighter when properly converted.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:59 AM
jontg428's Avatar
jontg428 jontg428 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Martinez California
Posts: 1,744
Send a message via Yahoo to jontg428
I don't think any 164's came with a manual rack

Maybe in europe they had a base model without power assist, but not in the US. I think even if you had the proper ratio to make it light enough to bear around town your steering speed would be so slow as to make you think you were driving a truck. I would just save your pennies and stick with the power assist, it has a nice weight and feel to it and is not overboosted. Just some food for thought
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2005, 11:52 AM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,423
Send a message via AIM to Grant
Yeah, I agree. Power steering have fewer turns lock to lock than say, a gtv6, because of the assist. A gtv6 would be tolerable because it was designed to work without assist. Greg's truck is an example, the truck was designed for manual steering duties and has many turns lock to lock.

I've driven a few FWD V6 cars (Acura legends) with powersteering that stopped working. It really isn't very safe to drive in traffic, and I'm by no means a small guy. I'd be willing to be that the 164's in europe with manual steering were the twin spark variety, with less weight over the front of the car. If I were Jake, I would try to source a parts car or a used rack and just swap it if the leak cannot be solved. But ofcourse, I don't know how much of a hassle the 164 rack is to work with
__________________
1987 Milano Platinum - check for many new items. PARTING OUT

1989 Verde - Harsh shocks and SS rears, 27mm torsion bars, stainless lines, pads, 16X7.5 rims, 4.10 rebuilt platinum tranny, poly bushes, and RSR 28mm front and 25.4mm adjustable sways!

1984 GTV-6 - 80K miles
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



AlfaBB Blog Articles

Advertisement


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright 2002-2008 AlfaBB.com All Rights Reserved.


An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com